Cargando…
Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four year...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790 |
_version_ | 1783603576971460608 |
---|---|
author | Giechaskiel, Barouch Lähde, Tero Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo Valverde, Victor Clairotte, Michael |
author_facet | Giechaskiel, Barouch Lähde, Tero Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo Valverde, Victor Clairotte, Michael |
author_sort | Giechaskiel, Barouch |
collection | PubMed |
description | For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four years of circulation. However, often the applicable smoke tests or on-board diagnostic (OBD) fault checks cannot identify malfunctions of the diesel particulate filters (DPFs). There are also serious concerns that a few high emitters are responsible for the majority of the emissions. For these reasons, a new PTI procedure at idle run with PN systems is under investigation. The correlations between type approval cycles and idle emissions are limited, especially for positive (spark) ignition vehicles. In this study the type approval PN emissions of 32 compression ignition and 56 spark ignition vehicles were compared to their idle PN concentrations from laboratory and on-road tests. The results confirmed that the idle test is applicable for diesel vehicles. The scatter for the spark ignition vehicles was much larger. Nevertheless, the proposed limit for diesel vehicles was also shown to be applicable for these vehicles. The technical specifications of the PTI sensors based on these findings were also discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7602039 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76020392020-11-01 Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors Giechaskiel, Barouch Lähde, Tero Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo Valverde, Victor Clairotte, Michael Sensors (Basel) Article For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four years of circulation. However, often the applicable smoke tests or on-board diagnostic (OBD) fault checks cannot identify malfunctions of the diesel particulate filters (DPFs). There are also serious concerns that a few high emitters are responsible for the majority of the emissions. For these reasons, a new PTI procedure at idle run with PN systems is under investigation. The correlations between type approval cycles and idle emissions are limited, especially for positive (spark) ignition vehicles. In this study the type approval PN emissions of 32 compression ignition and 56 spark ignition vehicles were compared to their idle PN concentrations from laboratory and on-road tests. The results confirmed that the idle test is applicable for diesel vehicles. The scatter for the spark ignition vehicles was much larger. Nevertheless, the proposed limit for diesel vehicles was also shown to be applicable for these vehicles. The technical specifications of the PTI sensors based on these findings were also discussed. MDPI 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7602039/ /pubmed/33066196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Giechaskiel, Barouch Lähde, Tero Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo Valverde, Victor Clairotte, Michael Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title | Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title_full | Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title_fullStr | Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title_short | Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors |
title_sort | comparisons of laboratory and on-road type-approval cycles with idling emissions. implications for periodical technical inspection (pti) sensors |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602039/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giechaskielbarouch comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors AT lahdetero comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors AT suarezbertoaricardo comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors AT valverdevictor comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors AT clairottemichael comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors |