Cargando…

Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors

For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giechaskiel, Barouch, Lähde, Tero, Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo, Valverde, Victor, Clairotte, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790
_version_ 1783603576971460608
author Giechaskiel, Barouch
Lähde, Tero
Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo
Valverde, Victor
Clairotte, Michael
author_facet Giechaskiel, Barouch
Lähde, Tero
Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo
Valverde, Victor
Clairotte, Michael
author_sort Giechaskiel, Barouch
collection PubMed
description For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four years of circulation. However, often the applicable smoke tests or on-board diagnostic (OBD) fault checks cannot identify malfunctions of the diesel particulate filters (DPFs). There are also serious concerns that a few high emitters are responsible for the majority of the emissions. For these reasons, a new PTI procedure at idle run with PN systems is under investigation. The correlations between type approval cycles and idle emissions are limited, especially for positive (spark) ignition vehicles. In this study the type approval PN emissions of 32 compression ignition and 56 spark ignition vehicles were compared to their idle PN concentrations from laboratory and on-road tests. The results confirmed that the idle test is applicable for diesel vehicles. The scatter for the spark ignition vehicles was much larger. Nevertheless, the proposed limit for diesel vehicles was also shown to be applicable for these vehicles. The technical specifications of the PTI sensors based on these findings were also discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76020392020-11-01 Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors Giechaskiel, Barouch Lähde, Tero Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo Valverde, Victor Clairotte, Michael Sensors (Basel) Article For the type approval of compression ignition (diesel) and gasoline direct injection vehicles, a particle number (PN) limit of 6 × 10(11) p/km is applicable. Diesel vehicles in circulation need to pass a periodical technical inspection (PTI) test, typically every two years, after the first four years of circulation. However, often the applicable smoke tests or on-board diagnostic (OBD) fault checks cannot identify malfunctions of the diesel particulate filters (DPFs). There are also serious concerns that a few high emitters are responsible for the majority of the emissions. For these reasons, a new PTI procedure at idle run with PN systems is under investigation. The correlations between type approval cycles and idle emissions are limited, especially for positive (spark) ignition vehicles. In this study the type approval PN emissions of 32 compression ignition and 56 spark ignition vehicles were compared to their idle PN concentrations from laboratory and on-road tests. The results confirmed that the idle test is applicable for diesel vehicles. The scatter for the spark ignition vehicles was much larger. Nevertheless, the proposed limit for diesel vehicles was also shown to be applicable for these vehicles. The technical specifications of the PTI sensors based on these findings were also discussed. MDPI 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7602039/ /pubmed/33066196 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Giechaskiel, Barouch
Lähde, Tero
Suarez-Bertoa, Ricardo
Valverde, Victor
Clairotte, Michael
Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title_full Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title_fullStr Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title_short Comparisons of Laboratory and On-Road Type-Approval Cycles with Idling Emissions. Implications for Periodical Technical Inspection (PTI) Sensors
title_sort comparisons of laboratory and on-road type-approval cycles with idling emissions. implications for periodical technical inspection (pti) sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066196
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20205790
work_keys_str_mv AT giechaskielbarouch comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors
AT lahdetero comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors
AT suarezbertoaricardo comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors
AT valverdevictor comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors
AT clairottemichael comparisonsoflaboratoryandonroadtypeapprovalcycleswithidlingemissionsimplicationsforperiodicaltechnicalinspectionptisensors