Cargando…

Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Youn I, Lee, Jong-Joon, Chung, Jun-Won, Kim, Kyoung Oh, Kim, Yoon Jae, Kim, Jung Ho, Park, Dong Kyun, Kwon, Kwang An
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286
_version_ 1783603577682395136
author Choi, Youn I
Lee, Jong-Joon
Chung, Jun-Won
Kim, Kyoung Oh
Kim, Yoon Jae
Kim, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Kyun
Kwon, Kwang An
author_facet Choi, Youn I
Lee, Jong-Joon
Chung, Jun-Won
Kim, Kyoung Oh
Kim, Yoon Jae
Kim, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Kyun
Kwon, Kwang An
author_sort Choi, Youn I
collection PubMed
description Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability profiles of probiotics with bisacodyl versus conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation for screening colonoscopies in healthy patients in this prospective, randomized, case-control study. In total, 385 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 L of water + 200 mL of probiotic solution (case group, n = 195) or 4 L of PEG solution (control group, n = 190). The efficacy of the bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa scale system, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate, and the patient tolerability profiles were assessed using a questionnaire. The demographics were not significantly different between groups. When the Ottawa score for each bowel segment was stratified into an adequate vs. inadequate level (Ottawa score ≤ 3 vs. >3), there were no statistical differences between groups in each segment of the colon. There were no significant differences in the polyp and adenoma detection rates between groups (38.42% vs. 32.42, p = 0.30; 25.79% vs. 18.97%, p = 0.11). The case group showed significantly fewer events than the control group, especially nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloating events. Regarding the overall satisfaction grade, the case group reported significantly more “average” scores (95% vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and were more willing to use the same agents again (90.26% vs. 61.85%, p < 0.001). As patient compliance with bowel preparation agents is associated with an adequate level of bowel cleansing, a probiotic solution with bisacodyl might be a new bowel preparation candidate, especially in patients who show a poor compliance with conventional bowel preparation agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76020422020-11-01 Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Choi, Youn I Lee, Jong-Joon Chung, Jun-Won Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Kyun Kwon, Kwang An J Clin Med Article Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability profiles of probiotics with bisacodyl versus conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation for screening colonoscopies in healthy patients in this prospective, randomized, case-control study. In total, 385 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 L of water + 200 mL of probiotic solution (case group, n = 195) or 4 L of PEG solution (control group, n = 190). The efficacy of the bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa scale system, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate, and the patient tolerability profiles were assessed using a questionnaire. The demographics were not significantly different between groups. When the Ottawa score for each bowel segment was stratified into an adequate vs. inadequate level (Ottawa score ≤ 3 vs. >3), there were no statistical differences between groups in each segment of the colon. There were no significant differences in the polyp and adenoma detection rates between groups (38.42% vs. 32.42, p = 0.30; 25.79% vs. 18.97%, p = 0.11). The case group showed significantly fewer events than the control group, especially nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloating events. Regarding the overall satisfaction grade, the case group reported significantly more “average” scores (95% vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and were more willing to use the same agents again (90.26% vs. 61.85%, p < 0.001). As patient compliance with bowel preparation agents is associated with an adequate level of bowel cleansing, a probiotic solution with bisacodyl might be a new bowel preparation candidate, especially in patients who show a poor compliance with conventional bowel preparation agents. MDPI 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7602042/ /pubmed/33066237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Youn I
Lee, Jong-Joon
Chung, Jun-Won
Kim, Kyoung Oh
Kim, Yoon Jae
Kim, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Kyun
Kwon, Kwang An
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_full Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_short Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy and patient tolerability profiles of probiotic solution with bisacodyl versus conventional cleansing solution for bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyouni efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leejongjoon efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chungjunwon efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimkyoungoh efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimyoonjae efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimjungho efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkdongkyun efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kwonkwangan efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial