Cargando…
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286 |
_version_ | 1783603577682395136 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Youn I Lee, Jong-Joon Chung, Jun-Won Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Kyun Kwon, Kwang An |
author_facet | Choi, Youn I Lee, Jong-Joon Chung, Jun-Won Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Kyun Kwon, Kwang An |
author_sort | Choi, Youn I |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability profiles of probiotics with bisacodyl versus conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation for screening colonoscopies in healthy patients in this prospective, randomized, case-control study. In total, 385 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 L of water + 200 mL of probiotic solution (case group, n = 195) or 4 L of PEG solution (control group, n = 190). The efficacy of the bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa scale system, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate, and the patient tolerability profiles were assessed using a questionnaire. The demographics were not significantly different between groups. When the Ottawa score for each bowel segment was stratified into an adequate vs. inadequate level (Ottawa score ≤ 3 vs. >3), there were no statistical differences between groups in each segment of the colon. There were no significant differences in the polyp and adenoma detection rates between groups (38.42% vs. 32.42, p = 0.30; 25.79% vs. 18.97%, p = 0.11). The case group showed significantly fewer events than the control group, especially nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloating events. Regarding the overall satisfaction grade, the case group reported significantly more “average” scores (95% vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and were more willing to use the same agents again (90.26% vs. 61.85%, p < 0.001). As patient compliance with bowel preparation agents is associated with an adequate level of bowel cleansing, a probiotic solution with bisacodyl might be a new bowel preparation candidate, especially in patients who show a poor compliance with conventional bowel preparation agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7602042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76020422020-11-01 Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Choi, Youn I Lee, Jong-Joon Chung, Jun-Won Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Kyun Kwon, Kwang An J Clin Med Article Although adequate bowel preparation is essential in screening colonoscopy, patient intolerability to bowel cleansing agents is problematic. Recently, a probiotic mixture solution with bisacodyl emerged to improve patient tolerability. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and patient tolerability profiles of probiotics with bisacodyl versus conventional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution for bowel preparation for screening colonoscopies in healthy patients in this prospective, randomized, case-control study. In total, 385 volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 L of water + 200 mL of probiotic solution (case group, n = 195) or 4 L of PEG solution (control group, n = 190). The efficacy of the bowel cleansing was evaluated using the Ottawa scale system, polyp detection rate, and adenoma detection rate, and the patient tolerability profiles were assessed using a questionnaire. The demographics were not significantly different between groups. When the Ottawa score for each bowel segment was stratified into an adequate vs. inadequate level (Ottawa score ≤ 3 vs. >3), there were no statistical differences between groups in each segment of the colon. There were no significant differences in the polyp and adenoma detection rates between groups (38.42% vs. 32.42, p = 0.30; 25.79% vs. 18.97%, p = 0.11). The case group showed significantly fewer events than the control group, especially nausea, vomiting, and abdominal bloating events. Regarding the overall satisfaction grade, the case group reported significantly more “average” scores (95% vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and were more willing to use the same agents again (90.26% vs. 61.85%, p < 0.001). As patient compliance with bowel preparation agents is associated with an adequate level of bowel cleansing, a probiotic solution with bisacodyl might be a new bowel preparation candidate, especially in patients who show a poor compliance with conventional bowel preparation agents. MDPI 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7602042/ /pubmed/33066237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Choi, Youn I Lee, Jong-Joon Chung, Jun-Won Kim, Kyoung Oh Kim, Yoon Jae Kim, Jung Ho Park, Dong Kyun Kwon, Kwang An Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title | Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_full | Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_short | Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial |
title_sort | efficacy and patient tolerability profiles of probiotic solution with bisacodyl versus conventional cleansing solution for bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choiyouni efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leejongjoon efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chungjunwon efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimkyoungoh efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimyoonjae efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimjungho efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkdongkyun efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kwonkwangan efficacyandpatienttolerabilityprofilesofprobioticsolutionwithbisacodylversusconventionalcleansingsolutionforbowelpreparationaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |