Cargando…

Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin

In the Carpathian Basin the wild boar (Sus scrofa) belongs among the most important game species both ecologically and economically, therefore knowing more about the basics of the genetics of the species is a key factor for accurate and sustainable management of its population. The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihalik, Bendegúz, Frank, Krisztián, Astuti, Putri Kusuma, Szemethy, Dániel, Szendrei, László, Szemethy, László, Kusza, Szilvia, Stéger, Viktor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194
_version_ 1783603607603511296
author Mihalik, Bendegúz
Frank, Krisztián
Astuti, Putri Kusuma
Szemethy, Dániel
Szendrei, László
Szemethy, László
Kusza, Szilvia
Stéger, Viktor
author_facet Mihalik, Bendegúz
Frank, Krisztián
Astuti, Putri Kusuma
Szemethy, Dániel
Szendrei, László
Szemethy, László
Kusza, Szilvia
Stéger, Viktor
author_sort Mihalik, Bendegúz
collection PubMed
description In the Carpathian Basin the wild boar (Sus scrofa) belongs among the most important game species both ecologically and economically, therefore knowing more about the basics of the genetics of the species is a key factor for accurate and sustainable management of its population. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic diversity and to elucidate the genetic structure and location of wild boar populations in the Carpathian Basin. A total of 486 samples were collected and genotyped using 13 STR markers. The number of alleles varied between 4 and 14, at 9 of the 13 loci the observed heterozygosity was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the expected value, showing remarkable introgression in the population. The population was separated into two groups, with an F(st) value of 0.03, suggesting the presence of two subpopulations. The first group included 147 individuals from the north-eastern part of Hungary, whereas the second group included 339 samples collected west and south of the first group. The two subpopulations’ genetic indices are roughly similar. The lack of physical barriers between the two groups indicates that the genetic difference is most likely caused by the high reproduction rate and large home range of the wild boars, or by some genetic traces’ having been preserved from both the last ice age and the period before the Hungarian water regulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76021512020-11-01 Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin Mihalik, Bendegúz Frank, Krisztián Astuti, Putri Kusuma Szemethy, Dániel Szendrei, László Szemethy, László Kusza, Szilvia Stéger, Viktor Genes (Basel) Article In the Carpathian Basin the wild boar (Sus scrofa) belongs among the most important game species both ecologically and economically, therefore knowing more about the basics of the genetics of the species is a key factor for accurate and sustainable management of its population. The aim of this study was to estimate the genetic diversity and to elucidate the genetic structure and location of wild boar populations in the Carpathian Basin. A total of 486 samples were collected and genotyped using 13 STR markers. The number of alleles varied between 4 and 14, at 9 of the 13 loci the observed heterozygosity was significantly different (p < 0.05) from the expected value, showing remarkable introgression in the population. The population was separated into two groups, with an F(st) value of 0.03, suggesting the presence of two subpopulations. The first group included 147 individuals from the north-eastern part of Hungary, whereas the second group included 339 samples collected west and south of the first group. The two subpopulations’ genetic indices are roughly similar. The lack of physical barriers between the two groups indicates that the genetic difference is most likely caused by the high reproduction rate and large home range of the wild boars, or by some genetic traces’ having been preserved from both the last ice age and the period before the Hungarian water regulation. MDPI 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7602151/ /pubmed/33066463 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mihalik, Bendegúz
Frank, Krisztián
Astuti, Putri Kusuma
Szemethy, Dániel
Szendrei, László
Szemethy, László
Kusza, Szilvia
Stéger, Viktor
Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title_full Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title_fullStr Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title_full_unstemmed Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title_short Population Genetic Structure of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in the Carpathian Basin
title_sort population genetic structure of the wild boar (sus scrofa) in the carpathian basin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066463
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11101194
work_keys_str_mv AT mihalikbendeguz populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT frankkrisztian populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT astutiputrikusuma populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT szemethydaniel populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT szendreilaszlo populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT szemethylaszlo populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT kuszaszilvia populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin
AT stegerviktor populationgeneticstructureofthewildboarsusscrofainthecarpathianbasin