Cargando…

Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke

The importance of knee sagittal kinematic parameters, as a predictor of walking performance in post-stroke gait has been emphasised by numerous researchers. However, no studies so far were designed to determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCID), i.e., the smallest difference in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guzik, Agnieszka, Drużbicki, Mariusz, Wolan-Nieroda, Andżelina, Turolla, Andrea, Kiper, Pawel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103305
_version_ 1783603668750172160
author Guzik, Agnieszka
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Wolan-Nieroda, Andżelina
Turolla, Andrea
Kiper, Pawel
author_facet Guzik, Agnieszka
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Wolan-Nieroda, Andżelina
Turolla, Andrea
Kiper, Pawel
author_sort Guzik, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description The importance of knee sagittal kinematic parameters, as a predictor of walking performance in post-stroke gait has been emphasised by numerous researchers. However, no studies so far were designed to determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCID), i.e., the smallest difference in the relevant score for the kinematic gait parameters, which are perceived as beneficial for patients with stroke. Studies focusing on clinically important difference are useful because they can identify the clinical relevance of changes in the scores. The purpose of the study was to estimate the MCID for knee range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane for the affected and unaffected side at a chronic stage post-stroke. Fifty individuals were identified in a database of a rehabilitation clinic. We estimated MCID values using: an anchor-based method, distribution-based method, linear regression analysis and specification of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In the anchor-based study, the mean change in knee flexion/extension ROM for the affected/unaffected side in the MCID group amounted to 8.48°/6.81° (the first MCID estimate). In the distribution-based study, the standard error of measurement for the no-change group was 1.86°/5.63° (the second MCID estimate). Method 3 analyses showed 7.71°/4.66° change in the ROM corresponding to 1.85-point change in the Barthel Index. The best cut-off point, determined with ROC curve, was the value corresponding to 3.9°/3.8° of change in the knee sagittal ROM for the affected/unaffected side (the fourth MCID estimate). We have determined that, in chronic stroke, MCID estimates of knee sagittal ROM for the affected side amount to 8.48° and for the unaffected side to 6.81°. These findings will assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting the significance of changes observed in kinematic sagittal plane parameters of the knee. The data are part of the following clinical trial: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000436370
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76023972020-11-01 Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke Guzik, Agnieszka Drużbicki, Mariusz Wolan-Nieroda, Andżelina Turolla, Andrea Kiper, Pawel J Clin Med Article The importance of knee sagittal kinematic parameters, as a predictor of walking performance in post-stroke gait has been emphasised by numerous researchers. However, no studies so far were designed to determine the minimal clinically important differences (MCID), i.e., the smallest difference in the relevant score for the kinematic gait parameters, which are perceived as beneficial for patients with stroke. Studies focusing on clinically important difference are useful because they can identify the clinical relevance of changes in the scores. The purpose of the study was to estimate the MCID for knee range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane for the affected and unaffected side at a chronic stage post-stroke. Fifty individuals were identified in a database of a rehabilitation clinic. We estimated MCID values using: an anchor-based method, distribution-based method, linear regression analysis and specification of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In the anchor-based study, the mean change in knee flexion/extension ROM for the affected/unaffected side in the MCID group amounted to 8.48°/6.81° (the first MCID estimate). In the distribution-based study, the standard error of measurement for the no-change group was 1.86°/5.63° (the second MCID estimate). Method 3 analyses showed 7.71°/4.66° change in the ROM corresponding to 1.85-point change in the Barthel Index. The best cut-off point, determined with ROC curve, was the value corresponding to 3.9°/3.8° of change in the knee sagittal ROM for the affected/unaffected side (the fourth MCID estimate). We have determined that, in chronic stroke, MCID estimates of knee sagittal ROM for the affected side amount to 8.48° and for the unaffected side to 6.81°. These findings will assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting the significance of changes observed in kinematic sagittal plane parameters of the knee. The data are part of the following clinical trial: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617000436370 MDPI 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7602397/ /pubmed/33076214 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103305 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guzik, Agnieszka
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Wolan-Nieroda, Andżelina
Turolla, Andrea
Kiper, Pawel
Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title_full Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title_fullStr Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title_short Estimating Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Knee Range of Motion after Stroke
title_sort estimating minimal clinically important differences for knee range of motion after stroke
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076214
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103305
work_keys_str_mv AT guzikagnieszka estimatingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforkneerangeofmotionafterstroke
AT druzbickimariusz estimatingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforkneerangeofmotionafterstroke
AT wolannierodaandzelina estimatingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforkneerangeofmotionafterstroke
AT turollaandrea estimatingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforkneerangeofmotionafterstroke
AT kiperpawel estimatingminimalclinicallyimportantdifferencesforkneerangeofmotionafterstroke