Cargando…

Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance

The study was aimed at comparing lower-limb strength and respiratory parameters between male and female athletes and their interaction with performance in a 107 km mountain ultramarathon. Forty seven runners (29 males and 18 females; mean ± SD age: 41 ± 5 years) were enrolled. Lower-limb strength as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio, Montoya-Vieco, Antonio, Collado, Eladio, Hernando, Bárbara, Hernando, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8100134
_version_ 1783603680228933632
author Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio
Montoya-Vieco, Antonio
Collado, Eladio
Hernando, Bárbara
Hernando, Carlos
author_facet Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio
Montoya-Vieco, Antonio
Collado, Eladio
Hernando, Bárbara
Hernando, Carlos
author_sort Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description The study was aimed at comparing lower-limb strength and respiratory parameters between male and female athletes and their interaction with performance in a 107 km mountain ultramarathon. Forty seven runners (29 males and 18 females; mean ± SD age: 41 ± 5 years) were enrolled. Lower-limb strength assessment comprised a squat jump test, an ankle rebound test, and an isometric strength test. Respiratory assessment included pulmonary function testing and the measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure. Male athletes performed largely better in the squat jump (26 ± 4 vs. 21 ± 3 cm; p < 0.001; d = 1.48), while no sex differences were found in the other two lower-limb tests. Concerning the respiratory parameters, male athletes showed largely greater values in pulmonary expiratory variables: forced vital capacity (5.19 ± 0.68 vs. 3.65 ± 0.52 L; p < 0.001; d = 2.53), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (4.24 ± 0.54 vs. 2.97 ± 0.39 L; p < 0.001; d = 2.69), peak expiratory flow (9.9 ± 1.56 vs. 5.89 ± 1.39 L/min; p < 0.001; d = 2.77) and maximum voluntary ventilation in 12 s (171 ± 39 vs. 108 ± 23 L/min; p < 0.001; d = 1.93); while no sex differences were identified in maximal inspiratory pressure. Race time was associated with ankle rebound test performance (r = −0.390; p = 0.027), isometric strength test performance (r = −0.349; p = 0.049) and maximal inspiratory pressure (r = −0.544; p < 0.001). Consequently, it seems that athletes competing in mountain ultramarathons may benefit from improving lower-limb isometric strength, ankle reactive strength and inspiratory muscle strength. Nevertheless, further interventional studies are required to confirm these exploratory results. In addition, the fact that the magnitude of the sex difference for isometric strength was minor, as compared with the other strength tests, could represent one of the factors explaining why the performance gap between males and females is reduced in ultramarathons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76024442020-11-01 Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio Montoya-Vieco, Antonio Collado, Eladio Hernando, Bárbara Hernando, Carlos Sports (Basel) Article The study was aimed at comparing lower-limb strength and respiratory parameters between male and female athletes and their interaction with performance in a 107 km mountain ultramarathon. Forty seven runners (29 males and 18 females; mean ± SD age: 41 ± 5 years) were enrolled. Lower-limb strength assessment comprised a squat jump test, an ankle rebound test, and an isometric strength test. Respiratory assessment included pulmonary function testing and the measurement of maximal inspiratory pressure. Male athletes performed largely better in the squat jump (26 ± 4 vs. 21 ± 3 cm; p < 0.001; d = 1.48), while no sex differences were found in the other two lower-limb tests. Concerning the respiratory parameters, male athletes showed largely greater values in pulmonary expiratory variables: forced vital capacity (5.19 ± 0.68 vs. 3.65 ± 0.52 L; p < 0.001; d = 2.53), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (4.24 ± 0.54 vs. 2.97 ± 0.39 L; p < 0.001; d = 2.69), peak expiratory flow (9.9 ± 1.56 vs. 5.89 ± 1.39 L/min; p < 0.001; d = 2.77) and maximum voluntary ventilation in 12 s (171 ± 39 vs. 108 ± 23 L/min; p < 0.001; d = 1.93); while no sex differences were identified in maximal inspiratory pressure. Race time was associated with ankle rebound test performance (r = −0.390; p = 0.027), isometric strength test performance (r = −0.349; p = 0.049) and maximal inspiratory pressure (r = −0.544; p < 0.001). Consequently, it seems that athletes competing in mountain ultramarathons may benefit from improving lower-limb isometric strength, ankle reactive strength and inspiratory muscle strength. Nevertheless, further interventional studies are required to confirm these exploratory results. In addition, the fact that the magnitude of the sex difference for isometric strength was minor, as compared with the other strength tests, could represent one of the factors explaining why the performance gap between males and females is reduced in ultramarathons. MDPI 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7602444/ /pubmed/33066606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8100134 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martinez-Navarro, Ignacio
Montoya-Vieco, Antonio
Collado, Eladio
Hernando, Bárbara
Hernando, Carlos
Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title_full Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title_fullStr Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title_full_unstemmed Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title_short Inspiratory and Lower-Limb Strength Importance in Mountain Ultramarathon Running. Sex Differences and Relationship with Performance
title_sort inspiratory and lower-limb strength importance in mountain ultramarathon running. sex differences and relationship with performance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33066606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8100134
work_keys_str_mv AT martineznavarroignacio inspiratoryandlowerlimbstrengthimportanceinmountainultramarathonrunningsexdifferencesandrelationshipwithperformance
AT montoyaviecoantonio inspiratoryandlowerlimbstrengthimportanceinmountainultramarathonrunningsexdifferencesandrelationshipwithperformance
AT colladoeladio inspiratoryandlowerlimbstrengthimportanceinmountainultramarathonrunningsexdifferencesandrelationshipwithperformance
AT hernandobarbara inspiratoryandlowerlimbstrengthimportanceinmountainultramarathonrunningsexdifferencesandrelationshipwithperformance
AT hernandocarlos inspiratoryandlowerlimbstrengthimportanceinmountainultramarathonrunningsexdifferencesandrelationshipwithperformance