Cargando…
We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512 |
_version_ | 1783603706874298368 |
---|---|
author | Lockie, Robert G. Dawes, J. Jay Moreno, Matthew R. McGuire, Megan B. Ruvalcaba, Tomas J. Bloodgood, Ashley M. Dulla, Joseph M. Orr, Robin M. |
author_facet | Lockie, Robert G. Dawes, J. Jay Moreno, Matthew R. McGuire, Megan B. Ruvalcaba, Tomas J. Bloodgood, Ashley M. Dulla, Joseph M. Orr, Robin M. |
author_sort | Lockie, Robert G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility of testing. This study determined fitness differences of law enforcement recruits hired under two different ATB protocols. Retrospective analysis was conducted on seven academy classes (442 males, 84 females) hired under an older ATB, and one class (45 males, 13 females) hired under a newer ATB. Recruits completed the following before academy: 60 s push-ups and sit-ups (muscular endurance); vertical jump (lower-body power); medicine ball throw (upper-body power); 75 yard pursuit run (75PR; change-of-direction speed); and 20 m multistage fitness test (20MSFT; aerobic fitness). Independent sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.001) and effect sizes (d) evaluated between-group fitness differences for recruits hired under the different ATB protocols (combined sexes, males, and females). There were no significant differences between the ATB groups. However, newer ATB female recruits completed 13% fewer 20MSFT shuttles than the older ATB group, which, although not significant (p = 0.007), did have a moderate effect (d = 0.62). Females hired under the newer ATB had lower aerobic fitness, which could impact physical training performance and graduation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7602546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76025462020-11-01 We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits Lockie, Robert G. Dawes, J. Jay Moreno, Matthew R. McGuire, Megan B. Ruvalcaba, Tomas J. Bloodgood, Ashley M. Dulla, Joseph M. Orr, Robin M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility of testing. This study determined fitness differences of law enforcement recruits hired under two different ATB protocols. Retrospective analysis was conducted on seven academy classes (442 males, 84 females) hired under an older ATB, and one class (45 males, 13 females) hired under a newer ATB. Recruits completed the following before academy: 60 s push-ups and sit-ups (muscular endurance); vertical jump (lower-body power); medicine ball throw (upper-body power); 75 yard pursuit run (75PR; change-of-direction speed); and 20 m multistage fitness test (20MSFT; aerobic fitness). Independent sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.001) and effect sizes (d) evaluated between-group fitness differences for recruits hired under the different ATB protocols (combined sexes, males, and females). There were no significant differences between the ATB groups. However, newer ATB female recruits completed 13% fewer 20MSFT shuttles than the older ATB group, which, although not significant (p = 0.007), did have a moderate effect (d = 0.62). Females hired under the newer ATB had lower aerobic fitness, which could impact physical training performance and graduation. MDPI 2020-10-15 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7602546/ /pubmed/33076438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lockie, Robert G. Dawes, J. Jay Moreno, Matthew R. McGuire, Megan B. Ruvalcaba, Tomas J. Bloodgood, Ashley M. Dulla, Joseph M. Orr, Robin M. We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title | We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title_full | We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title_fullStr | We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title_full_unstemmed | We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title_short | We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits |
title_sort | we need you: influence of hiring demand and modified applicant testing on the physical fitness of law enforcement recruits |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lockierobertg weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT dawesjjay weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT morenomatthewr weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT mcguiremeganb weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT ruvalcabatomasj weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT bloodgoodashleym weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT dullajosephm weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits AT orrrobinm weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits |