Cargando…

We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits

A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lockie, Robert G., Dawes, J. Jay, Moreno, Matthew R., McGuire, Megan B., Ruvalcaba, Tomas J., Bloodgood, Ashley M., Dulla, Joseph M., Orr, Robin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512
_version_ 1783603706874298368
author Lockie, Robert G.
Dawes, J. Jay
Moreno, Matthew R.
McGuire, Megan B.
Ruvalcaba, Tomas J.
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Orr, Robin M.
author_facet Lockie, Robert G.
Dawes, J. Jay
Moreno, Matthew R.
McGuire, Megan B.
Ruvalcaba, Tomas J.
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Orr, Robin M.
author_sort Lockie, Robert G.
collection PubMed
description A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility of testing. This study determined fitness differences of law enforcement recruits hired under two different ATB protocols. Retrospective analysis was conducted on seven academy classes (442 males, 84 females) hired under an older ATB, and one class (45 males, 13 females) hired under a newer ATB. Recruits completed the following before academy: 60 s push-ups and sit-ups (muscular endurance); vertical jump (lower-body power); medicine ball throw (upper-body power); 75 yard pursuit run (75PR; change-of-direction speed); and 20 m multistage fitness test (20MSFT; aerobic fitness). Independent sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.001) and effect sizes (d) evaluated between-group fitness differences for recruits hired under the different ATB protocols (combined sexes, males, and females). There were no significant differences between the ATB groups. However, newer ATB female recruits completed 13% fewer 20MSFT shuttles than the older ATB group, which, although not significant (p = 0.007), did have a moderate effect (d = 0.62). Females hired under the newer ATB had lower aerobic fitness, which could impact physical training performance and graduation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76025462020-11-01 We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits Lockie, Robert G. Dawes, J. Jay Moreno, Matthew R. McGuire, Megan B. Ruvalcaba, Tomas J. Bloodgood, Ashley M. Dulla, Joseph M. Orr, Robin M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article A challenge for law enforcement agencies is the many positions that need filling. Agencies may modify their applicant test battery (ATB; multilevelled testing including fitness, background checks, psychological evaluations) to increase the hiring pool of potential recruits by augmenting the utility of testing. This study determined fitness differences of law enforcement recruits hired under two different ATB protocols. Retrospective analysis was conducted on seven academy classes (442 males, 84 females) hired under an older ATB, and one class (45 males, 13 females) hired under a newer ATB. Recruits completed the following before academy: 60 s push-ups and sit-ups (muscular endurance); vertical jump (lower-body power); medicine ball throw (upper-body power); 75 yard pursuit run (75PR; change-of-direction speed); and 20 m multistage fitness test (20MSFT; aerobic fitness). Independent sample t-tests (p ≤ 0.001) and effect sizes (d) evaluated between-group fitness differences for recruits hired under the different ATB protocols (combined sexes, males, and females). There were no significant differences between the ATB groups. However, newer ATB female recruits completed 13% fewer 20MSFT shuttles than the older ATB group, which, although not significant (p = 0.007), did have a moderate effect (d = 0.62). Females hired under the newer ATB had lower aerobic fitness, which could impact physical training performance and graduation. MDPI 2020-10-15 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7602546/ /pubmed/33076438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lockie, Robert G.
Dawes, J. Jay
Moreno, Matthew R.
McGuire, Megan B.
Ruvalcaba, Tomas J.
Bloodgood, Ashley M.
Dulla, Joseph M.
Orr, Robin M.
We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title_full We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title_fullStr We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title_full_unstemmed We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title_short We Need You: Influence of Hiring Demand and Modified Applicant Testing on the Physical Fitness of Law Enforcement Recruits
title_sort we need you: influence of hiring demand and modified applicant testing on the physical fitness of law enforcement recruits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33076438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207512
work_keys_str_mv AT lockierobertg weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT dawesjjay weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT morenomatthewr weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT mcguiremeganb weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT ruvalcabatomasj weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT bloodgoodashleym weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT dullajosephm weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits
AT orrrobinm weneedyouinfluenceofhiringdemandandmodifiedapplicanttestingonthephysicalfitnessoflawenforcementrecruits