Cargando…

In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration

To investigate the influence of pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration on smear layer removal during different root canal irrigation strategies, single-root premolars were prepared with a mesio-occlusal cavity. Half were left untreated (G1), while the mesial walls of the remaining half were reconst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kharouf, Naji, Pedullà, Eugenio, La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria, Bukiet, Frédéric, Sauro, Salvatore, Haikel, Youssef, Mancino, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103325
_version_ 1783603773048881152
author Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
Bukiet, Frédéric
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_facet Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
Bukiet, Frédéric
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_sort Kharouf, Naji
collection PubMed
description To investigate the influence of pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration on smear layer removal during different root canal irrigation strategies, single-root premolars were prepared with a mesio-occlusal cavity. Half were left untreated (G1), while the mesial walls of the remaining half were reconstructed using a resin composite (G2). The specimens were divided into control (ctrl) groups, which used the conventional needle irrigation method, and four experimental subgroups according to irrigation strategy: Sonic activation using the Endoactivator, sonic activation using the EQ-S, mechanical activation using the XP-Endo finisher, and ultrasonic activation using the EndoUltra. Smear layer removal was assessed through SEM and the results were statistically analyzed. At the coronal and middle thirds, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was detected for G1 and G2, except for the control subgroups (G1ctrl vs G2 ctrl) at the middle third. At the apical third, the smear layer removal was significantly greater for G2 than G1. In G1, both at the middle and apical level, EQ-S and EndoUltra showed greater smear layer removal (p < 0.05) compared to the others G1 subgroups. In G2, at the apical level, the EQ-S and EndoUltra were the most effective in smear layer removal. Pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration may improve the smear layer removal during root canal irrigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7602818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76028182020-11-01 In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria Bukiet, Frédéric Sauro, Salvatore Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide J Clin Med Article To investigate the influence of pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration on smear layer removal during different root canal irrigation strategies, single-root premolars were prepared with a mesio-occlusal cavity. Half were left untreated (G1), while the mesial walls of the remaining half were reconstructed using a resin composite (G2). The specimens were divided into control (ctrl) groups, which used the conventional needle irrigation method, and four experimental subgroups according to irrigation strategy: Sonic activation using the Endoactivator, sonic activation using the EQ-S, mechanical activation using the XP-Endo finisher, and ultrasonic activation using the EndoUltra. Smear layer removal was assessed through SEM and the results were statistically analyzed. At the coronal and middle thirds, no significant difference (p > 0.05) was detected for G1 and G2, except for the control subgroups (G1ctrl vs G2 ctrl) at the middle third. At the apical third, the smear layer removal was significantly greater for G2 than G1. In G1, both at the middle and apical level, EQ-S and EndoUltra showed greater smear layer removal (p < 0.05) compared to the others G1 subgroups. In G2, at the apical level, the EQ-S and EndoUltra were the most effective in smear layer removal. Pre-endodontic coronal wall restoration may improve the smear layer removal during root canal irrigation. MDPI 2020-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7602818/ /pubmed/33081209 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103325 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
Bukiet, Frédéric
Sauro, Salvatore
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title_full In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title_fullStr In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title_short In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration
title_sort in vitro evaluation of different irrigation protocols on intracanal smear layer removal in teeth with or without pre-endodontic proximal wall restoration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7602818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081209
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9103325
work_keys_str_mv AT kharoufnaji invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT pedullaeugenio invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT larosagiusyritamaria invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT bukietfrederic invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT saurosalvatore invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT haikelyoussef invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration
AT mancinodavide invitroevaluationofdifferentirrigationprotocolsonintracanalsmearlayerremovalinteethwithorwithoutpreendodonticproximalwallrestoration