Cargando…

Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers

Laboratories testing predictive biomarkers in lung and colorectal cancer are advised to participate in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes. This study aimed to investigate which corrective actions were taken by laboratories if predetermined performance criteria were not met, to ultimately impr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keppens, Cleo, Schuuring, Ed, Dequeker, Elisabeth MC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33080995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100837
_version_ 1783603843105292288
author Keppens, Cleo
Schuuring, Ed
Dequeker, Elisabeth MC
author_facet Keppens, Cleo
Schuuring, Ed
Dequeker, Elisabeth MC
author_sort Keppens, Cleo
collection PubMed
description Laboratories testing predictive biomarkers in lung and colorectal cancer are advised to participate in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes. This study aimed to investigate which corrective actions were taken by laboratories if predetermined performance criteria were not met, to ultimately improve current test practices. EQA participants from the European Society of Pathology between 2014 and 2018 for lung and colorectal cancer were contacted, if they had at least one analysis error or test failure in the provided cases, to complete a survey. For 72.4% of 514 deviating EQA results, an appropriate action was performed, most often including staff training (15.2%) and protocol revisions (14.6%). Main assigned persons were the molecular biologist (40.0%) and pathologist (46.5%). A change in test method or the use of complex techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, required more training and the involvement of dedicated personnel to reduce future test failures. The majority of participants adhered to ISO 15189 and implemented suitable actions by designated staff, not limited to accredited laboratories. However, for 27.6% of cases (by 20 laboratories) no corrective action was taken, especially for pre-analytic problems and complex techniques. The surveys were feasible to request information on results follow-up and further recommendations were provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7603102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76031022020-11-01 Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers Keppens, Cleo Schuuring, Ed Dequeker, Elisabeth MC Diagnostics (Basel) Article Laboratories testing predictive biomarkers in lung and colorectal cancer are advised to participate in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes. This study aimed to investigate which corrective actions were taken by laboratories if predetermined performance criteria were not met, to ultimately improve current test practices. EQA participants from the European Society of Pathology between 2014 and 2018 for lung and colorectal cancer were contacted, if they had at least one analysis error or test failure in the provided cases, to complete a survey. For 72.4% of 514 deviating EQA results, an appropriate action was performed, most often including staff training (15.2%) and protocol revisions (14.6%). Main assigned persons were the molecular biologist (40.0%) and pathologist (46.5%). A change in test method or the use of complex techniques, such as next-generation sequencing, required more training and the involvement of dedicated personnel to reduce future test failures. The majority of participants adhered to ISO 15189 and implemented suitable actions by designated staff, not limited to accredited laboratories. However, for 27.6% of cases (by 20 laboratories) no corrective action was taken, especially for pre-analytic problems and complex techniques. The surveys were feasible to request information on results follow-up and further recommendations were provided. MDPI 2020-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7603102/ /pubmed/33080995 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100837 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Keppens, Cleo
Schuuring, Ed
Dequeker, Elisabeth MC
Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title_full Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title_fullStr Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title_short Managing Deviating EQA Results: A Survey to Assess the Corrective and Preventive Actions of Medical Laboratories Testing for Oncological Biomarkers
title_sort managing deviating eqa results: a survey to assess the corrective and preventive actions of medical laboratories testing for oncological biomarkers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33080995
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100837
work_keys_str_mv AT keppenscleo managingdeviatingeqaresultsasurveytoassessthecorrectiveandpreventiveactionsofmedicallaboratoriestestingforoncologicalbiomarkers
AT schuuringed managingdeviatingeqaresultsasurveytoassessthecorrectiveandpreventiveactionsofmedicallaboratoriestestingforoncologicalbiomarkers
AT dequekerelisabethmc managingdeviatingeqaresultsasurveytoassessthecorrectiveandpreventiveactionsofmedicallaboratoriestestingforoncologicalbiomarkers