Cargando…
Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206752 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847 |
_version_ | 1783603885716275200 |
---|---|
author | Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa Jukemura, Jose Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera |
author_facet | Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa Jukemura, Jose Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera |
author_sort | Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colonoscopy after colon preparation with 10% mannitol. We included outpatients aged over 18 years, with no history of gastric surgeries and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-rated anesthetic risk below III. Colonoscopy was performed after upper digestive endoscopy at two different times: 3 versus 6-hour after mannitol ingestion. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we measured RGV and evaluated pH with a digital pH meter. Clinical trials.gov: 71123317.9.3001.0065 RESULTS: We randomized a total of 100 participants to the 3 and 6-hour groups, with the patients in the 6-hour group being younger and presenting a higher body mass index (BMI). The intervention did not result in any statistically significant differences between the two groups, neither for the RGV (p=0.98) or the pH (p=0.732). However, the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus showed statistically significant higher RGV values in the 3-hour group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between RGV and pH values at 3 versus 6-hour after bowel preparation with mannitol, except for RGV in diabetic patients at 3 hours. As prolonged fasting protocols may result in adverse events such as dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, we can infer that colonic preparation with mannitol in shorter fasting periods, such as 3 hours, can be adopted safely and routinely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7603285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76032852020-11-10 Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa Jukemura, Jose Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colonoscopy after colon preparation with 10% mannitol. We included outpatients aged over 18 years, with no history of gastric surgeries and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-rated anesthetic risk below III. Colonoscopy was performed after upper digestive endoscopy at two different times: 3 versus 6-hour after mannitol ingestion. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we measured RGV and evaluated pH with a digital pH meter. Clinical trials.gov: 71123317.9.3001.0065 RESULTS: We randomized a total of 100 participants to the 3 and 6-hour groups, with the patients in the 6-hour group being younger and presenting a higher body mass index (BMI). The intervention did not result in any statistically significant differences between the two groups, neither for the RGV (p=0.98) or the pH (p=0.732). However, the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus showed statistically significant higher RGV values in the 3-hour group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between RGV and pH values at 3 versus 6-hour after bowel preparation with mannitol, except for RGV in diabetic patients at 3 hours. As prolonged fasting protocols may result in adverse events such as dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, we can infer that colonic preparation with mannitol in shorter fasting periods, such as 3 hours, can be adopted safely and routinely. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2020-11-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7603285/ /pubmed/33206752 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847 Text en Copyright © 2020 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa Jukemura, Jose Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title | Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title_full | Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title_short | Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
title_sort | evaluation of ph and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206752 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruizrenzofeitosa evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours AT jukemurajose evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours AT alvespaulorobertoarruda evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours |