Cargando…

Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa, Jukemura, Jose, Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda, dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206752
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847
_version_ 1783603885716275200
author Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa
Jukemura, Jose
Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
author_facet Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa
Jukemura, Jose
Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
author_sort Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colonoscopy after colon preparation with 10% mannitol. We included outpatients aged over 18 years, with no history of gastric surgeries and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-rated anesthetic risk below III. Colonoscopy was performed after upper digestive endoscopy at two different times: 3 versus 6-hour after mannitol ingestion. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we measured RGV and evaluated pH with a digital pH meter. Clinical trials.gov: 71123317.9.3001.0065 RESULTS: We randomized a total of 100 participants to the 3 and 6-hour groups, with the patients in the 6-hour group being younger and presenting a higher body mass index (BMI). The intervention did not result in any statistically significant differences between the two groups, neither for the RGV (p=0.98) or the pH (p=0.732). However, the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus showed statistically significant higher RGV values in the 3-hour group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between RGV and pH values at 3 versus 6-hour after bowel preparation with mannitol, except for RGV in diabetic patients at 3 hours. As prolonged fasting protocols may result in adverse events such as dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, we can infer that colonic preparation with mannitol in shorter fasting periods, such as 3 hours, can be adopted safely and routinely.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7603285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76032852020-11-10 Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa Jukemura, Jose Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to compare the hydrogen potential (pH) and residual gastric volume (RGV) of patients undergoing colonoscopy after 3 and 6 hours of colon preparation with mannitol. METHODS: We described a prospective randomized trial with a 50:50 allocation rate of two distinct times of colonoscopy after colon preparation with 10% mannitol. We included outpatients aged over 18 years, with no history of gastric surgeries and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)-rated anesthetic risk below III. Colonoscopy was performed after upper digestive endoscopy at two different times: 3 versus 6-hour after mannitol ingestion. During upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, we measured RGV and evaluated pH with a digital pH meter. Clinical trials.gov: 71123317.9.3001.0065 RESULTS: We randomized a total of 100 participants to the 3 and 6-hour groups, with the patients in the 6-hour group being younger and presenting a higher body mass index (BMI). The intervention did not result in any statistically significant differences between the two groups, neither for the RGV (p=0.98) or the pH (p=0.732). However, the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus showed statistically significant higher RGV values in the 3-hour group. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between RGV and pH values at 3 versus 6-hour after bowel preparation with mannitol, except for RGV in diabetic patients at 3 hours. As prolonged fasting protocols may result in adverse events such as dehydration and electrolyte imbalance, we can infer that colonic preparation with mannitol in shorter fasting periods, such as 3 hours, can be adopted safely and routinely. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2020-11-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7603285/ /pubmed/33206752 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847 Text en Copyright © 2020 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruiz, Renzo Feitosa
Jukemura, Jose
Alves, Paulo Roberto Arruda
dos Santos, Marcos Eduardo Lera
Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title_full Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title_fullStr Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title_short Evaluation of pH and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
title_sort evaluation of ph and residual gastric volume after colon preparation with mannitol: prospective randomized study comparing procedure performed after 3 hours versus 6 hours
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206752
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1847
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizrenzofeitosa evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours
AT jukemurajose evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours
AT alvespaulorobertoarruda evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours
AT dossantosmarcoseduardolera evaluationofphandresidualgastricvolumeaftercolonpreparationwithmannitolprospectiverandomizedstudycomparingprocedureperformedafter3hoursversus6hours