Cargando…
Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis
BACKGROUND: Although recruitment is a major challenge for most randomized controlled trials, few report on the difficulties of recruitment, or how it might be enhanced. The objective of our study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of both patients and pharmacists related to recruitment for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01140-6 |
_version_ | 1783603977210822656 |
---|---|
author | Fletcher, Jane M. Saunders-Smith, Terry Manns, Braden J. Tsuyuki, Ross Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. Tonelli, Marcello Campbell, David J. T. |
author_facet | Fletcher, Jane M. Saunders-Smith, Terry Manns, Braden J. Tsuyuki, Ross Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. Tonelli, Marcello Campbell, David J. T. |
author_sort | Fletcher, Jane M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although recruitment is a major challenge for most randomized controlled trials, few report on the difficulties of recruitment, or how it might be enhanced. The objective of our study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of both patients and pharmacists related to recruitment for ACCESS, a large trial involving low-income seniors, given that two of our most successful recruitment strategies were direct patient recruitment materials and use of community pharmacists. METHODS: Using qualitative descriptive methods, we collected data from pharmacists and study participants. Pharmacists were asked about their impressions of the study, as well as challenges they faced and methods they used to recruit potential participants. Focus groups with trial participants centered on the patient recruitment materials. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Pharmacists noted that their first impressions of the study were positive as they described being enticed to help the study team by the potential benefit of copayment elimination for their patients and the low time commitment. Pharmacists noted they were more likely to recruit if they were well informed on the study, as they could answer their patients’ questions. Participants noted that their primary motivations for participating were the tangible benefits of free medications and the intrinsic value of participating in research. CONCLUSIONS: We noted that recruitment through pharmacies was an effective method as most patients have trusting relationships with their pharmacist. To optimize recruitment through pharmacies, study procedures should be straightforward, and pharmacists need to be equipped with good knowledge of the study. When promoting a study to potential participants, messaging should ensure the individuals are aware of the tangible benefits of participation while still presenting a full overview of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration Number: NCT02579655 – initially registered Oct 19, 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7603682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76036822020-11-02 Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis Fletcher, Jane M. Saunders-Smith, Terry Manns, Braden J. Tsuyuki, Ross Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. Tonelli, Marcello Campbell, David J. T. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although recruitment is a major challenge for most randomized controlled trials, few report on the difficulties of recruitment, or how it might be enhanced. The objective of our study was to qualitatively explore the experiences of both patients and pharmacists related to recruitment for ACCESS, a large trial involving low-income seniors, given that two of our most successful recruitment strategies were direct patient recruitment materials and use of community pharmacists. METHODS: Using qualitative descriptive methods, we collected data from pharmacists and study participants. Pharmacists were asked about their impressions of the study, as well as challenges they faced and methods they used to recruit potential participants. Focus groups with trial participants centered on the patient recruitment materials. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Pharmacists noted that their first impressions of the study were positive as they described being enticed to help the study team by the potential benefit of copayment elimination for their patients and the low time commitment. Pharmacists noted they were more likely to recruit if they were well informed on the study, as they could answer their patients’ questions. Participants noted that their primary motivations for participating were the tangible benefits of free medications and the intrinsic value of participating in research. CONCLUSIONS: We noted that recruitment through pharmacies was an effective method as most patients have trusting relationships with their pharmacist. To optimize recruitment through pharmacies, study procedures should be straightforward, and pharmacists need to be equipped with good knowledge of the study. When promoting a study to potential participants, messaging should ensure the individuals are aware of the tangible benefits of participation while still presenting a full overview of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration Number: NCT02579655 – initially registered Oct 19, 2015. BioMed Central 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7603682/ /pubmed/33129278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01140-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fletcher, Jane M. Saunders-Smith, Terry Manns, Braden J. Tsuyuki, Ross Hemmelgarn, Brenda R. Tonelli, Marcello Campbell, David J. T. Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title | Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title_full | Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title_fullStr | Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title_short | Pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
title_sort | pharmacist and patient perspectives on recruitment strategies for randomized controlled trials: a qualitative analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01140-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fletcherjanem pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT saunderssmithterry pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT mannsbradenj pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT tsuyukiross pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT hemmelgarnbrendar pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT tonellimarcello pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis AT campbelldavidjt pharmacistandpatientperspectivesonrecruitmentstrategiesforrandomizedcontrolledtrialsaqualitativeanalysis |