Cargando…
Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z |
_version_ | 1783603984981819392 |
---|---|
author | Vieillard-Baron, Antoine Prigent, Amélie Repessé, Xavier Goudelin, Marine Prat, Gwenaël Evrard, Bruno Charron, Cyril Vignon, Philippe Geri, Guillaume |
author_facet | Vieillard-Baron, Antoine Prigent, Amélie Repessé, Xavier Goudelin, Marine Prat, Gwenaël Evrard, Bruno Charron, Cyril Vignon, Philippe Geri, Guillaume |
author_sort | Vieillard-Baron, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as well as TAPSE values. DESIGN: Ancillary study of the HEMOPRED prospective multicenter study includes patients under mechanical ventilation with circulatory failure. SETTING: This is a multicenter intensive care unit study PATIENTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with septic shock were analyzed. Patients were classified in three groups based on central venous pressure (CVP) and RV size (RV/LV end-diastolic area, EDA). In group 1, patients had no RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA < 0.6). In group 2, patients had RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA ≥ 0.6) with a CVP < 8 mmHg (no venous congestion). RV failure was defined in group 3 by RV dilatation and a CVP ≥ 8 mmHg. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was systematically recorded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 41% of patients were in group 1, 17% in group 2 and 42% in group 3. A correlation between RV size and CVP was only observed in group 3. Higher RV size was associated with a lower response to passive leg raising for a given PPV. A large overlap of TAPSE values was observed between the 3 groups. 63.5% of patients with RV failure had a normal TAPSE. CONCLUSIONS: RV failure, defined by critical care echocardiography (RV dilatation) and a surrogate of venous congestion (CVP ≥ 8 mmHg), was frequently observed in septic shock patients and negatively associated with response to a fluid challenge despite significant PPV. TAPSE was unable to discriminate patients with or without RV failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7603714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76037142020-11-02 Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness Vieillard-Baron, Antoine Prigent, Amélie Repessé, Xavier Goudelin, Marine Prat, Gwenaël Evrard, Bruno Charron, Cyril Vignon, Philippe Geri, Guillaume Crit Care Research OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as well as TAPSE values. DESIGN: Ancillary study of the HEMOPRED prospective multicenter study includes patients under mechanical ventilation with circulatory failure. SETTING: This is a multicenter intensive care unit study PATIENTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with septic shock were analyzed. Patients were classified in three groups based on central venous pressure (CVP) and RV size (RV/LV end-diastolic area, EDA). In group 1, patients had no RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA < 0.6). In group 2, patients had RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA ≥ 0.6) with a CVP < 8 mmHg (no venous congestion). RV failure was defined in group 3 by RV dilatation and a CVP ≥ 8 mmHg. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was systematically recorded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 41% of patients were in group 1, 17% in group 2 and 42% in group 3. A correlation between RV size and CVP was only observed in group 3. Higher RV size was associated with a lower response to passive leg raising for a given PPV. A large overlap of TAPSE values was observed between the 3 groups. 63.5% of patients with RV failure had a normal TAPSE. CONCLUSIONS: RV failure, defined by critical care echocardiography (RV dilatation) and a surrogate of venous congestion (CVP ≥ 8 mmHg), was frequently observed in septic shock patients and negatively associated with response to a fluid challenge despite significant PPV. TAPSE was unable to discriminate patients with or without RV failure. BioMed Central 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7603714/ /pubmed/33131508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Vieillard-Baron, Antoine Prigent, Amélie Repessé, Xavier Goudelin, Marine Prat, Gwenaël Evrard, Bruno Charron, Cyril Vignon, Philippe Geri, Guillaume Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title | Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title_full | Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title_fullStr | Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title_full_unstemmed | Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title_short | Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
title_sort | right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vieillardbaronantoine rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT prigentamelie rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT repessexavier rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT goudelinmarine rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT pratgwenael rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT evrardbruno rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT charroncyril rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT vignonphilippe rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness AT geriguillaume rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness |