Cargando…

Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness

OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vieillard-Baron, Antoine, Prigent, Amélie, Repessé, Xavier, Goudelin, Marine, Prat, Gwenaël, Evrard, Bruno, Charron, Cyril, Vignon, Philippe, Geri, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z
_version_ 1783603984981819392
author Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
Prigent, Amélie
Repessé, Xavier
Goudelin, Marine
Prat, Gwenaël
Evrard, Bruno
Charron, Cyril
Vignon, Philippe
Geri, Guillaume
author_facet Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
Prigent, Amélie
Repessé, Xavier
Goudelin, Marine
Prat, Gwenaël
Evrard, Bruno
Charron, Cyril
Vignon, Philippe
Geri, Guillaume
author_sort Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as well as TAPSE values. DESIGN: Ancillary study of the HEMOPRED prospective multicenter study includes patients under mechanical ventilation with circulatory failure. SETTING: This is a multicenter intensive care unit study PATIENTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with septic shock were analyzed. Patients were classified in three groups based on central venous pressure (CVP) and RV size (RV/LV end-diastolic area, EDA). In group 1, patients had no RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA < 0.6). In group 2, patients had RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA ≥ 0.6) with a CVP < 8 mmHg (no venous congestion). RV failure was defined in group 3 by RV dilatation and a CVP ≥ 8 mmHg. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was systematically recorded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 41% of patients were in group 1, 17% in group 2 and 42% in group 3. A correlation between RV size and CVP was only observed in group 3. Higher RV size was associated with a lower response to passive leg raising for a given PPV. A large overlap of TAPSE values was observed between the 3 groups. 63.5% of patients with RV failure had a normal TAPSE. CONCLUSIONS: RV failure, defined by critical care echocardiography (RV dilatation) and a surrogate of venous congestion (CVP ≥ 8 mmHg), was frequently observed in septic shock patients and negatively associated with response to a fluid challenge despite significant PPV. TAPSE was unable to discriminate patients with or without RV failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7603714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76037142020-11-02 Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness Vieillard-Baron, Antoine Prigent, Amélie Repessé, Xavier Goudelin, Marine Prat, Gwenaël Evrard, Bruno Charron, Cyril Vignon, Philippe Geri, Guillaume Crit Care Research OBJECTIVE: Incidence of right ventricular (RV) failure in septic shock patients is not well known, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be of limited value. We report the incidence of RV failure in patients with septic shock, its potential impact on the response to fluids, as well as TAPSE values. DESIGN: Ancillary study of the HEMOPRED prospective multicenter study includes patients under mechanical ventilation with circulatory failure. SETTING: This is a multicenter intensive care unit study PATIENTS: Two hundred and eighty-two patients with septic shock were analyzed. Patients were classified in three groups based on central venous pressure (CVP) and RV size (RV/LV end-diastolic area, EDA). In group 1, patients had no RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA < 0.6). In group 2, patients had RV dilatation (RV/LVEDA ≥ 0.6) with a CVP < 8 mmHg (no venous congestion). RV failure was defined in group 3 by RV dilatation and a CVP ≥ 8 mmHg. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was systematically recorded. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 41% of patients were in group 1, 17% in group 2 and 42% in group 3. A correlation between RV size and CVP was only observed in group 3. Higher RV size was associated with a lower response to passive leg raising for a given PPV. A large overlap of TAPSE values was observed between the 3 groups. 63.5% of patients with RV failure had a normal TAPSE. CONCLUSIONS: RV failure, defined by critical care echocardiography (RV dilatation) and a surrogate of venous congestion (CVP ≥ 8 mmHg), was frequently observed in septic shock patients and negatively associated with response to a fluid challenge despite significant PPV. TAPSE was unable to discriminate patients with or without RV failure. BioMed Central 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7603714/ /pubmed/33131508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
Prigent, Amélie
Repessé, Xavier
Goudelin, Marine
Prat, Gwenaël
Evrard, Bruno
Charron, Cyril
Vignon, Philippe
Geri, Guillaume
Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title_full Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title_fullStr Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title_full_unstemmed Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title_short Right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
title_sort right ventricular failure in septic shock: characterization, incidence and impact on fluid responsiveness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03345-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vieillardbaronantoine rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT prigentamelie rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT repessexavier rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT goudelinmarine rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT pratgwenael rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT evrardbruno rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT charroncyril rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT vignonphilippe rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness
AT geriguillaume rightventricularfailureinsepticshockcharacterizationincidenceandimpactonfluidresponsiveness