Cargando…

Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?

BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Bin, Kong, Qingquan, Yan, Yuqing, Feng, Pin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3
_version_ 1783603985243963392
author Zhang, Bin
Kong, Qingquan
Yan, Yuqing
Feng, Pin
author_facet Zhang, Bin
Kong, Qingquan
Yan, Yuqing
Feng, Pin
author_sort Zhang, Bin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 min. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P = 0.00), 2.47 (P = 0.71), and 19.40% (P = 0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28 ± 13.08 mm(2) vs.104.91 ± 12.40 mm(2), P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7603715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76037152020-11-02 Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? Zhang, Bin Kong, Qingquan Yan, Yuqing Feng, Pin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 min. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P = 0.00), 2.47 (P = 0.71), and 19.40% (P = 0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28 ± 13.08 mm(2) vs.104.91 ± 12.40 mm(2), P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure. BioMed Central 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7603715/ /pubmed/33129294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Bin
Kong, Qingquan
Yan, Yuqing
Feng, Pin
Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title_full Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title_fullStr Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title_full_unstemmed Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title_short Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
title_sort degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangbin degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient
AT kongqingquan degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient
AT yanyuqing degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient
AT fengpin degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient