Cargando…
Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient?
BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3 |
_version_ | 1783603985243963392 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Bin Kong, Qingquan Yan, Yuqing Feng, Pin |
author_facet | Zhang, Bin Kong, Qingquan Yan, Yuqing Feng, Pin |
author_sort | Zhang, Bin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 min. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P = 0.00), 2.47 (P = 0.71), and 19.40% (P = 0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28 ± 13.08 mm(2) vs.104.91 ± 12.40 mm(2), P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7603715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76037152020-11-02 Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? Zhang, Bin Kong, Qingquan Yan, Yuqing Feng, Pin BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: At present, few reports of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery have been reported to solve central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS). Is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach decompression sufficient for degenerative CLSS? METHODS: This retrospective study included 47 cases of CLSS patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach. Clinical outcomes such as ODI, back and leg VAS, the Macnab criteria were evaluated. Surgical results including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, recurrence, and surgical complications were also studied. Radiologically, lumbar stability was assessed and lumbar dural sac dimension was compared preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: All 47 patients were followed up. The average follow-up period was 24.5 months. The average operation time was 116 min. The mean VAS of leg and back pain, and the mean ODI improved from 7.81, 2.53, and 77.03% at baseline to a final 1.94 (P = 0.00), 2.47 (P = 0.71), and 19.40% (P = 0.00), respectively. According to the Macnab criteria, 97.9% of patients achieved excellent and good results. There were 2 cases of dural tear and 3 cases of transient postoperative dysthesia. The cross-sectional area of the dural sac was significant enlargement at the last fellow up (74.28 ± 13.08 mm(2) vs.104.91 ± 12.40 mm(2), P = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Except for the main pathogenic factors on the dorsal side of the dural sac, percutaneous endoscopic decompression through a bilateral transforaminal approach is sufficient for CLSS. It is a feasible, safe, and clinically effective minimally invasive procedure. BioMed Central 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7603715/ /pubmed/33129294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Bin Kong, Qingquan Yan, Yuqing Feng, Pin Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title | Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title_full | Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title_fullStr | Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title_full_unstemmed | Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title_short | Degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
title_sort | degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis: is endoscopic decompression through bilateral transforaminal approach sufficient? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33129294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03722-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangbin degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient AT kongqingquan degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient AT yanyuqing degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient AT fengpin degenerativecentrallumbarspinalstenosisisendoscopicdecompressionthroughbilateraltransforaminalapproachsufficient |