Cargando…
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about abrupt changes in the way health care is delivered, and the impact of transitioning outpatient clinic visits to telehealth visits on processes of care and outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated ordering patterns during ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.074 |
_version_ | 1783604064636895232 |
---|---|
author | Wosik, Jedrek Clowse, Megan E.B. Overton, Robert Adagarla, Bhargav Economou-Zavlanos, Nicoleta Cavalier, Joanna Henao, Ricardo Piccini, Jonathan P. Thomas, Laine Pencina, Michael J. Pagidipati, Neha J. |
author_facet | Wosik, Jedrek Clowse, Megan E.B. Overton, Robert Adagarla, Bhargav Economou-Zavlanos, Nicoleta Cavalier, Joanna Henao, Ricardo Piccini, Jonathan P. Thomas, Laine Pencina, Michael J. Pagidipati, Neha J. |
author_sort | Wosik, Jedrek |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about abrupt changes in the way health care is delivered, and the impact of transitioning outpatient clinic visits to telehealth visits on processes of care and outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated ordering patterns during cardiovascular telehealth clinic visits in the Duke University Health System between March 15 and June 30, 2020 and 30-day outcomes compared with in-person visits in the same time frame in 2020 and in 2019. RESULTS: Within the Duke University Health System, there was a 33.1% decrease in the number of outpatient cardiovascular visits conducted in the first 15 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with the same time period in 2019. As a proportion of total visits initially booked, 53% of visits were cancelled in 2020 compared to 35% in 2019. However, patients with cancelled visits had similar demographics and comorbidities in 2019 and 2020. Telehealth visits comprised 9.3% of total visits initially booked in 2020, with younger and healthier patients utilizing telehealth compared with those utilizing in-person visits. Compared with in-person visits in 2020, telehealth visits were associated with fewer new (31.6% for telehealth vs 44.6% for in person) or refill (12.9% vs 15.6%, respectively) medication prescriptions, electrocardiograms (4.3% vs 31.4%), laboratory orders (5.9% vs 21.8%), echocardiograms (7.3% vs 98%), and stress tests (4.4% vs 6.6%). When adjusted for age, race, and insurance status, those who had a telehealth visit or cancelled their visit were less likely to have an emergency department or hospital encounter within 30 days compared with those who had in-person visits (adjusted rate ratios (aRR) 0.76 [95% 0.65, 0.89] and aRR 0.71 [95% 0.65, 0.78], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In response to the perceived risks of routine medical care affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, different phenotypes of patients chose different types of outpatient cardiology care. A better understanding of these differences could help define necessary and appropriate mode of care for cardiology patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7604084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76040842020-11-02 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care Wosik, Jedrek Clowse, Megan E.B. Overton, Robert Adagarla, Bhargav Economou-Zavlanos, Nicoleta Cavalier, Joanna Henao, Ricardo Piccini, Jonathan P. Thomas, Laine Pencina, Michael J. Pagidipati, Neha J. Am Heart J Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about abrupt changes in the way health care is delivered, and the impact of transitioning outpatient clinic visits to telehealth visits on processes of care and outcomes is unclear. METHODS: We evaluated ordering patterns during cardiovascular telehealth clinic visits in the Duke University Health System between March 15 and June 30, 2020 and 30-day outcomes compared with in-person visits in the same time frame in 2020 and in 2019. RESULTS: Within the Duke University Health System, there was a 33.1% decrease in the number of outpatient cardiovascular visits conducted in the first 15 weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared with the same time period in 2019. As a proportion of total visits initially booked, 53% of visits were cancelled in 2020 compared to 35% in 2019. However, patients with cancelled visits had similar demographics and comorbidities in 2019 and 2020. Telehealth visits comprised 9.3% of total visits initially booked in 2020, with younger and healthier patients utilizing telehealth compared with those utilizing in-person visits. Compared with in-person visits in 2020, telehealth visits were associated with fewer new (31.6% for telehealth vs 44.6% for in person) or refill (12.9% vs 15.6%, respectively) medication prescriptions, electrocardiograms (4.3% vs 31.4%), laboratory orders (5.9% vs 21.8%), echocardiograms (7.3% vs 98%), and stress tests (4.4% vs 6.6%). When adjusted for age, race, and insurance status, those who had a telehealth visit or cancelled their visit were less likely to have an emergency department or hospital encounter within 30 days compared with those who had in-person visits (adjusted rate ratios (aRR) 0.76 [95% 0.65, 0.89] and aRR 0.71 [95% 0.65, 0.78], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In response to the perceived risks of routine medical care affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, different phenotypes of patients chose different types of outpatient cardiology care. A better understanding of these differences could help define necessary and appropriate mode of care for cardiology patients. Elsevier Inc. 2021-01 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7604084/ /pubmed/33137309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.074 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Wosik, Jedrek Clowse, Megan E.B. Overton, Robert Adagarla, Bhargav Economou-Zavlanos, Nicoleta Cavalier, Joanna Henao, Ricardo Piccini, Jonathan P. Thomas, Laine Pencina, Michael J. Pagidipati, Neha J. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title_full | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title_fullStr | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title_short | Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
title_sort | impact of the covid-19 pandemic on patterns of outpatient cardiovascular care |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33137309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2020.10.074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wosikjedrek impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT clowsemeganeb impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT overtonrobert impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT adagarlabhargav impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT economouzavlanosnicoleta impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT cavalierjoanna impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT henaoricardo impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT piccinijonathanp impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT thomaslaine impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT pencinamichaelj impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare AT pagidipatinehaj impactofthecovid19pandemiconpatternsofoutpatientcardiovascularcare |