Cargando…

Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?

The accreditation process is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools in Korea. The line that separates the two is based on how medical schools recognize and utilize the accreditation process. In other words, accreditation is a burden for medical schools if they view the accreditation pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Hanna, Jeon, Woo Taek, An, Shinki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.31
_version_ 1783604085264482304
author Jung, Hanna
Jeon, Woo Taek
An, Shinki
author_facet Jung, Hanna
Jeon, Woo Taek
An, Shinki
author_sort Jung, Hanna
collection PubMed
description The accreditation process is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools in Korea. The line that separates the two is based on how medical schools recognize and utilize the accreditation process. In other words, accreditation is a burden for medical schools if they view the accreditation process as merely a formal procedure or a means to maintain accreditation status for medical education. However, if medical schools acknowledge the positive value of the accreditation process, accreditation can be both an opportunity and a tool for developing medical education. The accreditation process has educational value by catalyzing improvements in the quality, equity, and efficiency of medical education and by increasing the available options. For the accreditation process to contribute to medical education development, accrediting agencies and medical schools must first be recognized as partners of an educational alliance working together towards common goals. Secondly, clear guidelines on accreditation standards should be periodically reviewed and shared. Finally, a formative self-evaluation process must be introduced for institutions to utilize the accreditation process as an opportunity to develop medical education. This evaluation system could be developed through collaboration among medical schools, academic societies for medical education, and the accrediting authority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76041692020-11-03 Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden? Jung, Hanna Jeon, Woo Taek An, Shinki J Educ Eval Health Prof Review The accreditation process is both an opportunity and a burden for medical schools in Korea. The line that separates the two is based on how medical schools recognize and utilize the accreditation process. In other words, accreditation is a burden for medical schools if they view the accreditation process as merely a formal procedure or a means to maintain accreditation status for medical education. However, if medical schools acknowledge the positive value of the accreditation process, accreditation can be both an opportunity and a tool for developing medical education. The accreditation process has educational value by catalyzing improvements in the quality, equity, and efficiency of medical education and by increasing the available options. For the accreditation process to contribute to medical education development, accrediting agencies and medical schools must first be recognized as partners of an educational alliance working together towards common goals. Secondly, clear guidelines on accreditation standards should be periodically reviewed and shared. Finally, a formative self-evaluation process must be introduced for institutions to utilize the accreditation process as an opportunity to develop medical education. This evaluation system could be developed through collaboration among medical schools, academic societies for medical education, and the accrediting authority. Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7604169/ /pubmed/33085998 http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.31 Text en © 2020, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jung, Hanna
Jeon, Woo Taek
An, Shinki
Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title_full Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title_fullStr Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title_full_unstemmed Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title_short Is accreditation in medical education in Korea an opportunity or a burden?
title_sort is accreditation in medical education in korea an opportunity or a burden?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085998
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.31
work_keys_str_mv AT junghanna isaccreditationinmedicaleducationinkoreaanopportunityoraburden
AT jeonwootaek isaccreditationinmedicaleducationinkoreaanopportunityoraburden
AT anshinki isaccreditationinmedicaleducationinkoreaanopportunityoraburden