Cargando…

Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients

Background: The limitation to the use of ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) in rehabilitation services is in contrast with its potential diagnostic capacity for rational planning and monitoring of the rehabilitation treatments, especially the overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT). Objective: To asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goffredo, Michela, Infarinato, Francesco, Pournajaf, Sanaz, Romano, Paola, Ottaviani, Marco, Pellicciari, Leonardo, Galafate, Daniele, Gabbani, Debora, Gison, Annalisa, Franceschini, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.564067
_version_ 1783604112412114944
author Goffredo, Michela
Infarinato, Francesco
Pournajaf, Sanaz
Romano, Paola
Ottaviani, Marco
Pellicciari, Leonardo
Galafate, Daniele
Gabbani, Debora
Gison, Annalisa
Franceschini, Marco
author_facet Goffredo, Michela
Infarinato, Francesco
Pournajaf, Sanaz
Romano, Paola
Ottaviani, Marco
Pellicciari, Leonardo
Galafate, Daniele
Gabbani, Debora
Gison, Annalisa
Franceschini, Marco
author_sort Goffredo, Michela
collection PubMed
description Background: The limitation to the use of ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) in rehabilitation services is in contrast with its potential diagnostic capacity for rational planning and monitoring of the rehabilitation treatments, especially the overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT). Objective: To assess the barriers to the implementation of a sEMG-based assessment protocol in a clinical context for evaluating the effects of o-RAGT in subacute stroke patients. Methods: An observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation hospital. The primary outcome was the success rate of the implementation of the sEMG-based assessment. The number of dropouts and the motivations have been registered. A detailed report on difficulties in implementing the sEMG protocol has been edited for each patient. The educational level and the working status of the staff have been registered. Each member of staff completed a brief survey indicating their level of knowledge of sEMG, using a five-point Likert scale. Results: The sEMG protocol was carried out by a multidisciplinary team composed of Physical Therapists (PTs) and Biomedical Engineers (BEs). Indeed, the educational level and the expertise of the members of staff influenced the fulfillment of the implementation of the study. The PTs involved in the study did not receive any formal education on sEMG during their course of study. The low success rate (22.7%) of the protocol was caused by several factors which could be grouped in: patient-related barriers; cultural barriers; technical barriers; and administrative barriers. Conclusions: Since a series of barriers limited the use of sEMG in the clinical rehabilitative environment, concrete actions are needed for disseminating sEMG in rehabilitation services. The sEMG assessment should be included in health systems regulations and specific education should be part of the rehabilitation professionals' curriculum. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03395717.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76042872020-11-13 Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients Goffredo, Michela Infarinato, Francesco Pournajaf, Sanaz Romano, Paola Ottaviani, Marco Pellicciari, Leonardo Galafate, Daniele Gabbani, Debora Gison, Annalisa Franceschini, Marco Front Neurol Neurology Background: The limitation to the use of ElectroMyoGraphy (sEMG) in rehabilitation services is in contrast with its potential diagnostic capacity for rational planning and monitoring of the rehabilitation treatments, especially the overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training (o-RAGT). Objective: To assess the barriers to the implementation of a sEMG-based assessment protocol in a clinical context for evaluating the effects of o-RAGT in subacute stroke patients. Methods: An observational study was conducted in a rehabilitation hospital. The primary outcome was the success rate of the implementation of the sEMG-based assessment. The number of dropouts and the motivations have been registered. A detailed report on difficulties in implementing the sEMG protocol has been edited for each patient. The educational level and the working status of the staff have been registered. Each member of staff completed a brief survey indicating their level of knowledge of sEMG, using a five-point Likert scale. Results: The sEMG protocol was carried out by a multidisciplinary team composed of Physical Therapists (PTs) and Biomedical Engineers (BEs). Indeed, the educational level and the expertise of the members of staff influenced the fulfillment of the implementation of the study. The PTs involved in the study did not receive any formal education on sEMG during their course of study. The low success rate (22.7%) of the protocol was caused by several factors which could be grouped in: patient-related barriers; cultural barriers; technical barriers; and administrative barriers. Conclusions: Since a series of barriers limited the use of sEMG in the clinical rehabilitative environment, concrete actions are needed for disseminating sEMG in rehabilitation services. The sEMG assessment should be included in health systems regulations and specific education should be part of the rehabilitation professionals' curriculum. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03395717. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7604287/ /pubmed/33193001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.564067 Text en Copyright © 2020 Goffredo, Infarinato, Pournajaf, Romano, Ottaviani, Pellicciari, Galafate, Gabbani, Gison and Franceschini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Goffredo, Michela
Infarinato, Francesco
Pournajaf, Sanaz
Romano, Paola
Ottaviani, Marco
Pellicciari, Leonardo
Galafate, Daniele
Gabbani, Debora
Gison, Annalisa
Franceschini, Marco
Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_full Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_short Barriers to sEMG Assessment During Overground Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Subacute Stroke Patients
title_sort barriers to semg assessment during overground robot-assisted gait training in subacute stroke patients
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.564067
work_keys_str_mv AT goffredomichela barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT infarinatofrancesco barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT pournajafsanaz barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT romanopaola barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT ottavianimarco barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT pellicciarileonardo barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT galafatedaniele barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT gabbanidebora barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT gisonannalisa barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients
AT franceschinimarco barrierstosemgassessmentduringovergroundrobotassistedgaittraininginsubacutestrokepatients