Cargando…

Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE: In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists had established a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline, which was updated in 2013 and subsequently in 2018. We assessed the clinical impact of the recent update by compar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Min Chong, Kang, Su Hwan, Choi, Jung Eun, Bae, Young Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Breast Cancer Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33154824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e53
_version_ 1783604133575524352
author Kim, Min Chong
Kang, Su Hwan
Choi, Jung Eun
Bae, Young Kyung
author_facet Kim, Min Chong
Kang, Su Hwan
Choi, Jung Eun
Bae, Young Kyung
author_sort Kim, Min Chong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists had established a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline, which was updated in 2013 and subsequently in 2018. We assessed the clinical impact of the recent update by comparing the in situ hybridization (ISH) results based on the 2007, 2013, and 2018 guidelines. METHODS: We assessed 2 cohorts. The first cohort included 1,161 primary invasive breast cancer (IBC) samples including 18 bilateral IBC cases, with both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver-enhanced ISH (SISH) results available for the HER2 status. The second cohort included 160 IBC cases with equivocal HER2 IHC, assessed using SISH. We retrospectively evaluated and compared the HER2 SISH results. RESULTS: There were 22 (1.9%) and 20 (12.5%) cases with altered SISH results according to the 2013 guidelines in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. As per the 2018 guidelines, final HER2 statuses of 16 (1.4%) and 14 (8.5%) cases changed in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The 2013 guidelines increased the positive rate compared to the 2007 guidelines, in both cohorts (0.6% and 6.2%, respectively). Most equivocal cases in cohorts 1 (92.3%) and 2 (100%) as per the 2013 guidelines were reclassified as HER2-negative according to the 2018 guidelines. The 2018 guidelines increased the negative rates (1.3% in cohort 1 and 8.7% in cohort 2) and slightly decreased the positive rates (−0.2% in cohort 1 and −3.1% in cohort 2), compared to the 2013 guidelines. With each update, minor changes in the positive and negative rates were observed in whole breast cancer samples (cohort 1). However, the 2018 guidelines affected previously defined HER2-positive IBC with equivocal IHC results. CONCLUSION: Under the 2013 guidelines, the positive and equivocal cases increased. However, the 2018 guidelines eliminated ambiguous cases by reclassifying them as HER2-negative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Breast Cancer Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76043742020-11-04 Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer Kim, Min Chong Kang, Su Hwan Choi, Jung Eun Bae, Young Kyung J Breast Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: In 2007, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists had established a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing guideline, which was updated in 2013 and subsequently in 2018. We assessed the clinical impact of the recent update by comparing the in situ hybridization (ISH) results based on the 2007, 2013, and 2018 guidelines. METHODS: We assessed 2 cohorts. The first cohort included 1,161 primary invasive breast cancer (IBC) samples including 18 bilateral IBC cases, with both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver-enhanced ISH (SISH) results available for the HER2 status. The second cohort included 160 IBC cases with equivocal HER2 IHC, assessed using SISH. We retrospectively evaluated and compared the HER2 SISH results. RESULTS: There were 22 (1.9%) and 20 (12.5%) cases with altered SISH results according to the 2013 guidelines in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. As per the 2018 guidelines, final HER2 statuses of 16 (1.4%) and 14 (8.5%) cases changed in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. The 2013 guidelines increased the positive rate compared to the 2007 guidelines, in both cohorts (0.6% and 6.2%, respectively). Most equivocal cases in cohorts 1 (92.3%) and 2 (100%) as per the 2013 guidelines were reclassified as HER2-negative according to the 2018 guidelines. The 2018 guidelines increased the negative rates (1.3% in cohort 1 and 8.7% in cohort 2) and slightly decreased the positive rates (−0.2% in cohort 1 and −3.1% in cohort 2), compared to the 2013 guidelines. With each update, minor changes in the positive and negative rates were observed in whole breast cancer samples (cohort 1). However, the 2018 guidelines affected previously defined HER2-positive IBC with equivocal IHC results. CONCLUSION: Under the 2013 guidelines, the positive and equivocal cases increased. However, the 2018 guidelines eliminated ambiguous cases by reclassifying them as HER2-negative. Korean Breast Cancer Society 2020-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7604374/ /pubmed/33154824 http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e53 Text en © 2020 Korean Breast Cancer Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Min Chong
Kang, Su Hwan
Choi, Jung Eun
Bae, Young Kyung
Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title_full Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title_short Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer
title_sort impact of the updated guidelines on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (her2) testing in breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33154824
http://dx.doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e53
work_keys_str_mv AT kimminchong impactoftheupdatedguidelinesonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2testinginbreastcancer
AT kangsuhwan impactoftheupdatedguidelinesonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2testinginbreastcancer
AT choijungeun impactoftheupdatedguidelinesonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2testinginbreastcancer
AT baeyoungkyung impactoftheupdatedguidelinesonhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2her2testinginbreastcancer