Cargando…
Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333 |
_version_ | 1783604142959230976 |
---|---|
author | Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Sulam, Jeremias Fertig, Elana J. Szalay, Alexander S. Jaffee, Elizabeth M. Stearns, Vered Emens, Leisha A. Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M. Popel, Aleksander S. |
author_facet | Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Sulam, Jeremias Fertig, Elana J. Szalay, Alexander S. Jaffee, Elizabeth M. Stearns, Vered Emens, Leisha A. Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M. Popel, Aleksander S. |
author_sort | Mi, Haoyang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These analyses have been applied to CD8+ T cells, but quantitative analyses of other important markers and their correlations are limited. In this study, a digital pathology computational workflow is formulated for characterizing the spatial distributions of five immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3) and then the functionality is tested on whole slide images from patients with TNBC. The workflow is initiated by digital image processing to extract and colocalize immune marker-labeled cells and then convert this information to point patterns. Afterward invasive front (IF), central tumor (CT), and normal tissue (N) are characterized. For each region, we examine the intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The workflow is then repeated for all specimens to capture inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In this study, both intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneities are observed for all five markers across all specimens. Among all regions, IF tends to have higher densities of immune cells and overall larger variations in spatial model fitting parameters and higher density in cell clusters and hotspots compared to CT and N. Results suggest a distinct role of IF in the tumor immuno-architecture. Though the sample size is limited in the study, the computational workflow could be readily reproduced and scaled due to its automatic nature. Importantly, the value of the workflow also lies in its potential to be linked to treatment outcomes and identification of predictive biomarkers for responders/non-responders, and its application to parameterization and validation of computational immuno-oncology models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7604437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76044372020-11-13 Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Sulam, Jeremias Fertig, Elana J. Szalay, Alexander S. Jaffee, Elizabeth M. Stearns, Vered Emens, Leisha A. Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M. Popel, Aleksander S. Front Physiol Physiology Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These analyses have been applied to CD8+ T cells, but quantitative analyses of other important markers and their correlations are limited. In this study, a digital pathology computational workflow is formulated for characterizing the spatial distributions of five immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3) and then the functionality is tested on whole slide images from patients with TNBC. The workflow is initiated by digital image processing to extract and colocalize immune marker-labeled cells and then convert this information to point patterns. Afterward invasive front (IF), central tumor (CT), and normal tissue (N) are characterized. For each region, we examine the intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The workflow is then repeated for all specimens to capture inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In this study, both intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneities are observed for all five markers across all specimens. Among all regions, IF tends to have higher densities of immune cells and overall larger variations in spatial model fitting parameters and higher density in cell clusters and hotspots compared to CT and N. Results suggest a distinct role of IF in the tumor immuno-architecture. Though the sample size is limited in the study, the computational workflow could be readily reproduced and scaled due to its automatic nature. Importantly, the value of the workflow also lies in its potential to be linked to treatment outcomes and identification of predictive biomarkers for responders/non-responders, and its application to parameterization and validation of computational immuno-oncology models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7604437/ /pubmed/33192595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mi, Gong, Sulam, Fertig, Szalay, Jaffee, Stearns, Emens, Cimino-Mathews and Popel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Sulam, Jeremias Fertig, Elana J. Szalay, Alexander S. Jaffee, Elizabeth M. Stearns, Vered Emens, Leisha A. Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M. Popel, Aleksander S. Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title | Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full | Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_short | Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer |
title_sort | digital pathology analysis quantifies spatial heterogeneity of cd3, cd4, cd8, cd20, and foxp3 immune markers in triple-negative breast cancer |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mihaoyang digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT gongchang digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT sulamjeremias digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT fertigelanaj digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT szalayalexanders digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT jaffeeelizabethm digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT stearnsvered digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT emensleishaa digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT ciminomathewsashleym digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer AT popelaleksanders digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer |