Cargando…

Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mi, Haoyang, Gong, Chang, Sulam, Jeremias, Fertig, Elana J., Szalay, Alexander S., Jaffee, Elizabeth M., Stearns, Vered, Emens, Leisha A., Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M., Popel, Aleksander S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192595
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333
_version_ 1783604142959230976
author Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Sulam, Jeremias
Fertig, Elana J.
Szalay, Alexander S.
Jaffee, Elizabeth M.
Stearns, Vered
Emens, Leisha A.
Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M.
Popel, Aleksander S.
author_facet Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Sulam, Jeremias
Fertig, Elana J.
Szalay, Alexander S.
Jaffee, Elizabeth M.
Stearns, Vered
Emens, Leisha A.
Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M.
Popel, Aleksander S.
author_sort Mi, Haoyang
collection PubMed
description Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These analyses have been applied to CD8+ T cells, but quantitative analyses of other important markers and their correlations are limited. In this study, a digital pathology computational workflow is formulated for characterizing the spatial distributions of five immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3) and then the functionality is tested on whole slide images from patients with TNBC. The workflow is initiated by digital image processing to extract and colocalize immune marker-labeled cells and then convert this information to point patterns. Afterward invasive front (IF), central tumor (CT), and normal tissue (N) are characterized. For each region, we examine the intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The workflow is then repeated for all specimens to capture inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In this study, both intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneities are observed for all five markers across all specimens. Among all regions, IF tends to have higher densities of immune cells and overall larger variations in spatial model fitting parameters and higher density in cell clusters and hotspots compared to CT and N. Results suggest a distinct role of IF in the tumor immuno-architecture. Though the sample size is limited in the study, the computational workflow could be readily reproduced and scaled due to its automatic nature. Importantly, the value of the workflow also lies in its potential to be linked to treatment outcomes and identification of predictive biomarkers for responders/non-responders, and its application to parameterization and validation of computational immuno-oncology models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76044372020-11-13 Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Mi, Haoyang Gong, Chang Sulam, Jeremias Fertig, Elana J. Szalay, Alexander S. Jaffee, Elizabeth M. Stearns, Vered Emens, Leisha A. Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M. Popel, Aleksander S. Front Physiol Physiology Overwhelming evidence has shown the significant role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in governing the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) progression. Digital pathology can provide key information about the spatial heterogeneity within the TME using image analysis and spatial statistics. These analyses have been applied to CD8+ T cells, but quantitative analyses of other important markers and their correlations are limited. In this study, a digital pathology computational workflow is formulated for characterizing the spatial distributions of five immune markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3) and then the functionality is tested on whole slide images from patients with TNBC. The workflow is initiated by digital image processing to extract and colocalize immune marker-labeled cells and then convert this information to point patterns. Afterward invasive front (IF), central tumor (CT), and normal tissue (N) are characterized. For each region, we examine the intra-tumoral heterogeneity. The workflow is then repeated for all specimens to capture inter-tumoral heterogeneity. In this study, both intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneities are observed for all five markers across all specimens. Among all regions, IF tends to have higher densities of immune cells and overall larger variations in spatial model fitting parameters and higher density in cell clusters and hotspots compared to CT and N. Results suggest a distinct role of IF in the tumor immuno-architecture. Though the sample size is limited in the study, the computational workflow could be readily reproduced and scaled due to its automatic nature. Importantly, the value of the workflow also lies in its potential to be linked to treatment outcomes and identification of predictive biomarkers for responders/non-responders, and its application to parameterization and validation of computational immuno-oncology models. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7604437/ /pubmed/33192595 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mi, Gong, Sulam, Fertig, Szalay, Jaffee, Stearns, Emens, Cimino-Mathews and Popel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Mi, Haoyang
Gong, Chang
Sulam, Jeremias
Fertig, Elana J.
Szalay, Alexander S.
Jaffee, Elizabeth M.
Stearns, Vered
Emens, Leisha A.
Cimino-Mathews, Ashley M.
Popel, Aleksander S.
Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title_short Digital Pathology Analysis Quantifies Spatial Heterogeneity of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, and FoxP3 Immune Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
title_sort digital pathology analysis quantifies spatial heterogeneity of cd3, cd4, cd8, cd20, and foxp3 immune markers in triple-negative breast cancer
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33192595
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.583333
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaoyang digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT gongchang digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT sulamjeremias digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT fertigelanaj digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT szalayalexanders digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT jaffeeelizabethm digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT stearnsvered digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT emensleishaa digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT ciminomathewsashleym digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer
AT popelaleksanders digitalpathologyanalysisquantifiesspatialheterogeneityofcd3cd4cd8cd20andfoxp3immunemarkersintriplenegativebreastcancer