Cargando…

Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2

The diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection relies on the detection of viral RNA by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) performed with respiratory specimens, especially nasopharyngeal swabs. However, this procedure requires...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzi, L., Maurino, V., Baj, A., Dani, M., d’Aiuto, A., Fasano, M., Lualdi, M., Sessa, F., Alberio, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520969670
_version_ 1783604185205309440
author Azzi, L.
Maurino, V.
Baj, A.
Dani, M.
d’Aiuto, A.
Fasano, M.
Lualdi, M.
Sessa, F.
Alberio, T.
author_facet Azzi, L.
Maurino, V.
Baj, A.
Dani, M.
d’Aiuto, A.
Fasano, M.
Lualdi, M.
Sessa, F.
Alberio, T.
author_sort Azzi, L.
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection relies on the detection of viral RNA by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) performed with respiratory specimens, especially nasopharyngeal swabs. However, this procedure requires specialized medical personnel, centralized laboratory facilities, and time to provide results (from several hours up to 1 d). In addition, there is a non-negligible risk of viral transmission for the operator who performs the procedure. For these reasons, several studies have suggested the use of other body fluids, including saliva, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The use of saliva as a diagnostic specimen has numerous advantages: it is easily self-collected by the patient with almost no discomfort, it does not require specialized health care personnel for its management, and it reduces the risks for the operator. In the past few months, several scientific papers, media, and companies have announced the development of new salivary tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Posterior oropharyngeal saliva should be distinguished from oral saliva, since the former is a part of respiratory secretions, while the latter is produced by the salivary glands, which are outside the respiratory tract. Saliva can be analyzed through standard (rRT-PCR) or rapid molecular biology tests (direct rRT-PCR without extraction), although, in a hospital setting, these procedures may be performed only in addition to nasopharyngeal swabs to minimize the incidence of false-negative results. Conversely, the promising role of saliva in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is highlighted by the emergence of point-of-care technologies and, most important, point-of-need devices. Indeed, these devices can be directly used in workplaces, airports, schools, cinemas, and shopping centers. An example is the recently described Rapid Salivary Test, an antigen test based on the lateral flow assay, which detects the presence of the virus by identifying the spike protein in the saliva within a few minutes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76046732020-11-02 Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Azzi, L. Maurino, V. Baj, A. Dani, M. d’Aiuto, A. Fasano, M. Lualdi, M. Sessa, F. Alberio, T. J Dent Res Reviews The diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection relies on the detection of viral RNA by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) performed with respiratory specimens, especially nasopharyngeal swabs. However, this procedure requires specialized medical personnel, centralized laboratory facilities, and time to provide results (from several hours up to 1 d). In addition, there is a non-negligible risk of viral transmission for the operator who performs the procedure. For these reasons, several studies have suggested the use of other body fluids, including saliva, for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The use of saliva as a diagnostic specimen has numerous advantages: it is easily self-collected by the patient with almost no discomfort, it does not require specialized health care personnel for its management, and it reduces the risks for the operator. In the past few months, several scientific papers, media, and companies have announced the development of new salivary tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection. Posterior oropharyngeal saliva should be distinguished from oral saliva, since the former is a part of respiratory secretions, while the latter is produced by the salivary glands, which are outside the respiratory tract. Saliva can be analyzed through standard (rRT-PCR) or rapid molecular biology tests (direct rRT-PCR without extraction), although, in a hospital setting, these procedures may be performed only in addition to nasopharyngeal swabs to minimize the incidence of false-negative results. Conversely, the promising role of saliva in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is highlighted by the emergence of point-of-care technologies and, most important, point-of-need devices. Indeed, these devices can be directly used in workplaces, airports, schools, cinemas, and shopping centers. An example is the recently described Rapid Salivary Test, an antigen test based on the lateral flow assay, which detects the presence of the virus by identifying the spike protein in the saliva within a few minutes. SAGE Publications 2020-10-31 2021-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7604673/ /pubmed/33131360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520969670 Text en © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Azzi, L.
Maurino, V.
Baj, A.
Dani, M.
d’Aiuto, A.
Fasano, M.
Lualdi, M.
Sessa, F.
Alberio, T.
Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title_full Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title_short Diagnostic Salivary Tests for SARS-CoV-2
title_sort diagnostic salivary tests for sars-cov-2
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33131360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520969670
work_keys_str_mv AT azzil diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT maurinov diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT baja diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT danim diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT daiutoa diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT fasanom diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT lualdim diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT sessaf diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2
AT alberiot diagnosticsalivarytestsforsarscov2