Cargando…

Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery

OBJECTIVE: A laryngocele is a space that develops as a result of pathological dilatation of the laryngeal saccule. However, the reported management of laryngoceles varies. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the surgical management of laryngoceles and pyolaryngoceles, to und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Ravjit, Karantanis, William, Fadhil, Matthew, Kumar, Shivani Angelique, Crawford, Julia, Jacobson, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520940441
_version_ 1783604231420248064
author Singh, Ravjit
Karantanis, William
Fadhil, Matthew
Kumar, Shivani Angelique
Crawford, Julia
Jacobson, Ian
author_facet Singh, Ravjit
Karantanis, William
Fadhil, Matthew
Kumar, Shivani Angelique
Crawford, Julia
Jacobson, Ian
author_sort Singh, Ravjit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A laryngocele is a space that develops as a result of pathological dilatation of the laryngeal saccule. However, the reported management of laryngoceles varies. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the surgical management of laryngoceles and pyolaryngoceles, to understand the evolving nature of treatment for this rare condition. METHODS: We searched for publications in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, and Ovid databases using the terms “laryngocele”, “pyolaryngocele”, and “laryngopyocele”, and reviewed the identified articles. RESULTS: After removal of repeated studies and filtering for relevance and studies written in English, a total of 227 studies were included in this review. No meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials have been published. The identified studies have been summarized in 14 reviews conducted since 1946. The meta-analysis determined that endoscopy was the preferred approach for internal laryngoceles, while combined laryngoceles benefited from both internal and external surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngocele management has progressed since its initial description, from open surgery to an endoscopic approach, and more recently to a robotic-assisted surgical approach. The uptake of robotic surgery as a possible treatment modality over the last decade shows much promise for the treatment of these conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7604991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76049912020-11-12 Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery Singh, Ravjit Karantanis, William Fadhil, Matthew Kumar, Shivani Angelique Crawford, Julia Jacobson, Ian J Int Med Res Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: A laryngocele is a space that develops as a result of pathological dilatation of the laryngeal saccule. However, the reported management of laryngoceles varies. We conducted a systematic review of the literature regarding the surgical management of laryngoceles and pyolaryngoceles, to understand the evolving nature of treatment for this rare condition. METHODS: We searched for publications in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, JBI Library of Systematic Reviews, and Ovid databases using the terms “laryngocele”, “pyolaryngocele”, and “laryngopyocele”, and reviewed the identified articles. RESULTS: After removal of repeated studies and filtering for relevance and studies written in English, a total of 227 studies were included in this review. No meta-analyses or randomized controlled trials have been published. The identified studies have been summarized in 14 reviews conducted since 1946. The meta-analysis determined that endoscopy was the preferred approach for internal laryngoceles, while combined laryngoceles benefited from both internal and external surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngocele management has progressed since its initial description, from open surgery to an endoscopic approach, and more recently to a robotic-assisted surgical approach. The uptake of robotic surgery as a possible treatment modality over the last decade shows much promise for the treatment of these conditions. SAGE Publications 2020-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7604991/ /pubmed/33100073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520940441 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Singh, Ravjit
Karantanis, William
Fadhil, Matthew
Kumar, Shivani Angelique
Crawford, Julia
Jacobson, Ian
Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title_full Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title_fullStr Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title_short Systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
title_sort systematic review of laryngocele and pyolaryngocele management in the age of robotic surgery
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7604991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060520940441
work_keys_str_mv AT singhravjit systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery
AT karantaniswilliam systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery
AT fadhilmatthew systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery
AT kumarshivaniangelique systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery
AT crawfordjulia systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery
AT jacobsonian systematicreviewoflaryngoceleandpyolaryngocelemanagementintheageofroboticsurgery