Cargando…

Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the protective effect of Botulinum A toxin injection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into: control, ischemia-reperfusion, ischemic preconditioning, and botulinum groups. In al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan, DEMİRÖZ, Anıl, AYDIN, Yağmur, EKMEKÇİ, Hakan, BALCI EKMEKÇİ, Özlem, AYDIN, Övgü, CANKORKMAZ, Levent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-95
_version_ 1783604248442830848
author DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan
DEMİRÖZ, Anıl
AYDIN, Yağmur
EKMEKÇİ, Hakan
BALCI EKMEKÇİ, Özlem
AYDIN, Övgü
CANKORKMAZ, Levent
author_facet DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan
DEMİRÖZ, Anıl
AYDIN, Yağmur
EKMEKÇİ, Hakan
BALCI EKMEKÇİ, Özlem
AYDIN, Övgü
CANKORKMAZ, Levent
author_sort DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the protective effect of Botulinum A toxin injection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into: control, ischemia-reperfusion, ischemic preconditioning, and botulinum groups. In all groups the musculocutaneous pedicle flap was occluded for 4 h, and then reperfused to induce ischemia-reperfusion injury. Serum and tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured at 24 h and at 10 days. RESULTS: Tissue MPO levels did not differ significantly between the ischemic preconditioning and botulinum groups at 24 h but was significantly lower in the botulinum group at 10 days. Tissue NO levels were significantly higher in the ischemic preconditioning group compared to the botulinum group at 24 h and at 10 days. Serum MPO showed no significant difference between these two groups at 24 h but was significantly lower in the ischemic preconditioning group compared to the botulinum group at 10 days. Serum NO levels were not significantly different at 24 h but significantly higher in the botulinum group at 10 days. CONCLUSION: Findings show that botulinum has a protective effect against the ischemia-reperfusion injury via increased NO and decreased MPO levels in tissue. Based on tissue NO levels, ischemic preconditioning was significantly higher than botulinum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7605091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76050912020-11-03 Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan DEMİRÖZ, Anıl AYDIN, Yağmur EKMEKÇİ, Hakan BALCI EKMEKÇİ, Özlem AYDIN, Övgü CANKORKMAZ, Levent Turk J Med Sci Article BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the protective effect of Botulinum A toxin injection against ischemia-reperfusion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into: control, ischemia-reperfusion, ischemic preconditioning, and botulinum groups. In all groups the musculocutaneous pedicle flap was occluded for 4 h, and then reperfused to induce ischemia-reperfusion injury. Serum and tissue myeloperoxidase (MPO) and nitric oxide (NO) levels were measured at 24 h and at 10 days. RESULTS: Tissue MPO levels did not differ significantly between the ischemic preconditioning and botulinum groups at 24 h but was significantly lower in the botulinum group at 10 days. Tissue NO levels were significantly higher in the ischemic preconditioning group compared to the botulinum group at 24 h and at 10 days. Serum MPO showed no significant difference between these two groups at 24 h but was significantly lower in the ischemic preconditioning group compared to the botulinum group at 10 days. Serum NO levels were not significantly different at 24 h but significantly higher in the botulinum group at 10 days. CONCLUSION: Findings show that botulinum has a protective effect against the ischemia-reperfusion injury via increased NO and decreased MPO levels in tissue. Based on tissue NO levels, ischemic preconditioning was significantly higher than botulinum. The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7605091/ /pubmed/32718122 http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-95 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
DEREBAŞINLIOĞLU, Handan
DEMİRÖZ, Anıl
AYDIN, Yağmur
EKMEKÇİ, Hakan
BALCI EKMEKÇİ, Özlem
AYDIN, Övgü
CANKORKMAZ, Levent
Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title_full Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title_fullStr Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title_short Comparison of ischemic preconditioning and BotulinumA Toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
title_sort comparison of ischemic preconditioning and botulinuma toxin injection for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury in musculocutaneous flaps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718122
http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1904-95
work_keys_str_mv AT derebasinliogluhandan comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT demirozanıl comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT aydinyagmur comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT ekmekcihakan comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT balciekmekciozlem comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT aydinovgu comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps
AT cankorkmazlevent comparisonofischemicpreconditioningandbotulinumatoxininjectionforthepreventionofischemiareperfusioninjuryinmusculocutaneousflaps