Cargando…
Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy
The purpose of this report was to systematically review the radiation enhancement factor (REF) effects of immunotherapy on radiotherapy (RT) to the local tumor in comparison with other traditional radiation sensitizers such as cisplatin. PubMed and Medline databases were searched until February 2019...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832760 |
_version_ | 1783604292442128384 |
---|---|
author | Vanneste, Ben G.L. Van Limbergen, Evert J Dubois, Ludwig Samarska, Iryna V. Wieten, L. Aarts, M. J.B. Marcelissen, T. De Ruysscher, Dirk |
author_facet | Vanneste, Ben G.L. Van Limbergen, Evert J Dubois, Ludwig Samarska, Iryna V. Wieten, L. Aarts, M. J.B. Marcelissen, T. De Ruysscher, Dirk |
author_sort | Vanneste, Ben G.L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this report was to systematically review the radiation enhancement factor (REF) effects of immunotherapy on radiotherapy (RT) to the local tumor in comparison with other traditional radiation sensitizers such as cisplatin. PubMed and Medline databases were searched until February 2019. Reports with abscopal effect in the results were excluded. Graphs of the selected papers were digitized using Plot Digitizer (Sourceforge.net) in order to calculate the tumor growth delay (TGD) caused by immunotherapy. To enable comparison between different studies,the TGD were used to define the REF between RT versus the RT/immunotherapy combination. Thirty-two preclinical papers, and nine clinical series were selected. Different mouse models were exposed to RT doses ranging from 1 to 10 fractions of 1.8 to 20 Gray (Gy) per fraction. Endpoints were heterogeneous, ranging from regression to complete local response. No randomized clinical studies were identified. The median preclinical REF effect of different immunotherapy was varying from 1.7 to 9.1. There was no relationship observed either with subclasses of immunotherapy orRT doses. In the clinical studies, RT doses ranged from 1 to 37 fractions of 1.8 to 24 Gy per fraction. Most clinical trials used ipilimumab and interleukin-2. Local control rate in the clinical series ranged from 66% to 100%. A strong REF of immunotherapy (1.7 to 9.1) was observed, this being higher than traditionally sensitizers such as cisplatin (1.1). This result implies that for the same RT dose, a higher local control was achieved with a combination of immunotherapy and RT in preclinical settings. This study therefore supports the use of combined RT and immunotherapy to improve local tumor control in clinical settings without exacerbation of toxicities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7605354 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76053542020-11-12 Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy Vanneste, Ben G.L. Van Limbergen, Evert J Dubois, Ludwig Samarska, Iryna V. Wieten, L. Aarts, M. J.B. Marcelissen, T. De Ruysscher, Dirk Oncoimmunology Review The purpose of this report was to systematically review the radiation enhancement factor (REF) effects of immunotherapy on radiotherapy (RT) to the local tumor in comparison with other traditional radiation sensitizers such as cisplatin. PubMed and Medline databases were searched until February 2019. Reports with abscopal effect in the results were excluded. Graphs of the selected papers were digitized using Plot Digitizer (Sourceforge.net) in order to calculate the tumor growth delay (TGD) caused by immunotherapy. To enable comparison between different studies,the TGD were used to define the REF between RT versus the RT/immunotherapy combination. Thirty-two preclinical papers, and nine clinical series were selected. Different mouse models were exposed to RT doses ranging from 1 to 10 fractions of 1.8 to 20 Gray (Gy) per fraction. Endpoints were heterogeneous, ranging from regression to complete local response. No randomized clinical studies were identified. The median preclinical REF effect of different immunotherapy was varying from 1.7 to 9.1. There was no relationship observed either with subclasses of immunotherapy orRT doses. In the clinical studies, RT doses ranged from 1 to 37 fractions of 1.8 to 24 Gy per fraction. Most clinical trials used ipilimumab and interleukin-2. Local control rate in the clinical series ranged from 66% to 100%. A strong REF of immunotherapy (1.7 to 9.1) was observed, this being higher than traditionally sensitizers such as cisplatin (1.1). This result implies that for the same RT dose, a higher local control was achieved with a combination of immunotherapy and RT in preclinical settings. This study therefore supports the use of combined RT and immunotherapy to improve local tumor control in clinical settings without exacerbation of toxicities. Taylor & Francis 2020-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7605354/ /pubmed/33194319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832760 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Vanneste, Ben G.L. Van Limbergen, Evert J Dubois, Ludwig Samarska, Iryna V. Wieten, L. Aarts, M. J.B. Marcelissen, T. De Ruysscher, Dirk Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title | Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title_full | Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title_short | Immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
title_sort | immunotherapy as sensitizer for local radiotherapy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832760 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vannestebengl immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT vanlimbergenevertj immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT duboisludwig immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT samarskairynav immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT wietenl immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT aartsmjb immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT marcelissent immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy AT deruysscherdirk immunotherapyassensitizerforlocalradiotherapy |