Cargando…

Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?

PURPOSE: Radical external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy is standard of care for patients with localized carcinoma of the cervix unsuitable for radical surgery. However, outcome data are scarce in resource-limited settings. We conducted a retrospective analysis of s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Nuradh, Jayalath, Hasanthi, Balawardena, Jayantha, Skandarajah, Thurairajah, Perera, Kanthi, Gunasekera, Dehan, Weerasinghe, Sujeeva, Hoskin, Peter, Choudhury, Ananya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00196
_version_ 1783604294603243520
author Joseph, Nuradh
Jayalath, Hasanthi
Balawardena, Jayantha
Skandarajah, Thurairajah
Perera, Kanthi
Gunasekera, Dehan
Weerasinghe, Sujeeva
Hoskin, Peter
Choudhury, Ananya
author_facet Joseph, Nuradh
Jayalath, Hasanthi
Balawardena, Jayantha
Skandarajah, Thurairajah
Perera, Kanthi
Gunasekera, Dehan
Weerasinghe, Sujeeva
Hoskin, Peter
Choudhury, Ananya
author_sort Joseph, Nuradh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radical external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy is standard of care for patients with localized carcinoma of the cervix unsuitable for radical surgery. However, outcome data are scarce in resource-limited settings. We conducted a retrospective analysis of survival in a cohort of patients treated with this strategy in Sri Lanka. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with localized cervical cancer treated with primary EBRT and intracavitary brachytherapy from 2014 to 2015 were included in the study. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time to local or systemic recurrence or death. Univariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic significance of the following variables: age, stage, use of concurrent chemotherapy, EBRT dose, brachytherapy dose, and time to completion of treatment (dichotomized at 60 days). Factors significant on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable model. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with available data were included in the analysis. Mean age was 58 years (range, 35-85 years), and most patients (n = 103 of 113) presented with stage ≥ IIB disease. Median time to delivery of brachytherapy from commencement of EBRT was 110 days (range, 34-215 days), with only 12 (11%) of 113 patients completing treatment within 60 days. Median follow-up was 28 months (range, 5-60 months), and 2-year DFS was 63.7% (95% CI, 55.4% to 73.2%). Treatment delay was the only significant factor associated with inferior DFS on univariable analysis (log-rank P = .03), and therefore, multivariable analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: There are significant delays in receiving intracavitary brachytherapy after completing EBRT for cervical cancer in Sri Lanka, which is associated with inferior DFS. Increasing brachytherapy resources is an urgent priority to improve outcomes of patients with cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7605371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76053712020-11-09 Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied? Joseph, Nuradh Jayalath, Hasanthi Balawardena, Jayantha Skandarajah, Thurairajah Perera, Kanthi Gunasekera, Dehan Weerasinghe, Sujeeva Hoskin, Peter Choudhury, Ananya JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: Radical external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) followed by intracavitary brachytherapy is standard of care for patients with localized carcinoma of the cervix unsuitable for radical surgery. However, outcome data are scarce in resource-limited settings. We conducted a retrospective analysis of survival in a cohort of patients treated with this strategy in Sri Lanka. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with localized cervical cancer treated with primary EBRT and intracavitary brachytherapy from 2014 to 2015 were included in the study. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time to local or systemic recurrence or death. Univariable analysis was performed to determine the prognostic significance of the following variables: age, stage, use of concurrent chemotherapy, EBRT dose, brachytherapy dose, and time to completion of treatment (dichotomized at 60 days). Factors significant on univariable analysis were included in a multivariable model. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients with available data were included in the analysis. Mean age was 58 years (range, 35-85 years), and most patients (n = 103 of 113) presented with stage ≥ IIB disease. Median time to delivery of brachytherapy from commencement of EBRT was 110 days (range, 34-215 days), with only 12 (11%) of 113 patients completing treatment within 60 days. Median follow-up was 28 months (range, 5-60 months), and 2-year DFS was 63.7% (95% CI, 55.4% to 73.2%). Treatment delay was the only significant factor associated with inferior DFS on univariable analysis (log-rank P = .03), and therefore, multivariable analysis was not performed. CONCLUSION: There are significant delays in receiving intracavitary brachytherapy after completing EBRT for cervical cancer in Sri Lanka, which is associated with inferior DFS. Increasing brachytherapy resources is an urgent priority to improve outcomes of patients with cervical cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7605371/ /pubmed/33079608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00196 Text en © 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Joseph, Nuradh
Jayalath, Hasanthi
Balawardena, Jayantha
Skandarajah, Thurairajah
Perera, Kanthi
Gunasekera, Dehan
Weerasinghe, Sujeeva
Hoskin, Peter
Choudhury, Ananya
Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title_full Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title_fullStr Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title_full_unstemmed Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title_short Radical External-Beam Radiotherapy in Combination With Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Localized Carcinoma of the Cervix in Sri Lanka: Is Treatment Delayed Treatment Denied?
title_sort radical external-beam radiotherapy in combination with intracavitary brachytherapy for localized carcinoma of the cervix in sri lanka: is treatment delayed treatment denied?
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00196
work_keys_str_mv AT josephnuradh radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT jayalathhasanthi radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT balawardenajayantha radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT skandarajahthurairajah radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT pererakanthi radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT gunasekeradehan radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT weerasinghesujeeva radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT hoskinpeter radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied
AT choudhuryananya radicalexternalbeamradiotherapyincombinationwithintracavitarybrachytherapyforlocalizedcarcinomaofthecervixinsrilankaistreatmentdelayedtreatmentdenied