Cargando…
Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasophar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055 |
_version_ | 1783604330265313280 |
---|---|
author | Yee, Rebecca Truong, Thao Pannaraj, Pia S. Eubanks, Natalie Gai, Emily Jumarang, Jaycee Turner, Lauren Peralta, Ariana Lee, Yesun Dien Bard, Jennifer |
author_facet | Yee, Rebecca Truong, Thao Pannaraj, Pia S. Eubanks, Natalie Gai, Emily Jumarang, Jaycee Turner, Lauren Peralta, Ariana Lee, Yesun Dien Bard, Jennifer |
author_sort | Yee, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS were compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordance for saliva and NPS was 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS was 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva detected 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. In symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA: 82.4% vs 85.3%). The overall PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva detecting 4 cases less than NPS. However, saliva performance in symptomatic adults was identical to NPS (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate alternative sample choice to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7605576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76055762020-11-03 Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults Yee, Rebecca Truong, Thao Pannaraj, Pia S. Eubanks, Natalie Gai, Emily Jumarang, Jaycee Turner, Lauren Peralta, Ariana Lee, Yesun Dien Bard, Jennifer medRxiv Article Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS were compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordance for saliva and NPS was 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS was 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva detected 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. In symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA: 82.4% vs 85.3%). The overall PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva detecting 4 cases less than NPS. However, saliva performance in symptomatic adults was identical to NPS (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate alternative sample choice to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7605576/ /pubmed/33140064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Yee, Rebecca Truong, Thao Pannaraj, Pia S. Eubanks, Natalie Gai, Emily Jumarang, Jaycee Turner, Lauren Peralta, Ariana Lee, Yesun Dien Bard, Jennifer Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title | Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title_full | Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title_fullStr | Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title_short | Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults |
title_sort | saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of sars-cov-2 in children and adults |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeerebecca salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT truongthao salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT pannarajpias salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT eubanksnatalie salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT gaiemily salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT jumarangjaycee salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT turnerlauren salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT peraltaariana salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT leeyesun salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults AT dienbardjennifer salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults |