Cargando…

Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults

Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasophar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yee, Rebecca, Truong, Thao, Pannaraj, Pia S., Eubanks, Natalie, Gai, Emily, Jumarang, Jaycee, Turner, Lauren, Peralta, Ariana, Lee, Yesun, Dien Bard, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055
_version_ 1783604330265313280
author Yee, Rebecca
Truong, Thao
Pannaraj, Pia S.
Eubanks, Natalie
Gai, Emily
Jumarang, Jaycee
Turner, Lauren
Peralta, Ariana
Lee, Yesun
Dien Bard, Jennifer
author_facet Yee, Rebecca
Truong, Thao
Pannaraj, Pia S.
Eubanks, Natalie
Gai, Emily
Jumarang, Jaycee
Turner, Lauren
Peralta, Ariana
Lee, Yesun
Dien Bard, Jennifer
author_sort Yee, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS were compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordance for saliva and NPS was 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS was 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva detected 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. In symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA: 82.4% vs 85.3%). The overall PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva detecting 4 cases less than NPS. However, saliva performance in symptomatic adults was identical to NPS (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate alternative sample choice to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7605576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76055762020-11-03 Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults Yee, Rebecca Truong, Thao Pannaraj, Pia S. Eubanks, Natalie Gai, Emily Jumarang, Jaycee Turner, Lauren Peralta, Ariana Lee, Yesun Dien Bard, Jennifer medRxiv Article Testing efforts for SARS-CoV-2 have been burdened by the scarcity of testing materials and personal protective equipment for healthcare workers. The simple and painless process of saliva collection allows for widespread testing, but enthusiasm is hampered by variable performance compared to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples. We prospectively collected paired NPS and saliva samples from a total of 300 unique adult and pediatric patients. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in 32.2% (97/300) of the individuals using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit (Thermo Fisher). Performance of saliva and NPS were compared against the total number of positives regardless of specimen type. The overall concordance for saliva and NPS was 91.0% (273/300) and 94.7% (284/300), respectively. The positive percent agreement (PPA) for saliva and NPS was 81.4% (79/97) and 89.7% (87/97), respectively. Saliva detected 10 positive cases that were negative by NPS. In symptomatic and asymptomatic pediatric patients not previously diagnosed with COVID-19, the performances of saliva and NPS were comparable (PPA: 82.4% vs 85.3%). The overall PPA for adults were 83.3% and 90.7% for saliva and NPS, respectively, with saliva detecting 4 cases less than NPS. However, saliva performance in symptomatic adults was identical to NPS (PPA of 93.8%). With lower cost and self-collection capabilities, saliva can be an appropriate alternative sample choice to NPS for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2020-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7605576/ /pubmed/33140064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Yee, Rebecca
Truong, Thao
Pannaraj, Pia S.
Eubanks, Natalie
Gai, Emily
Jumarang, Jaycee
Turner, Lauren
Peralta, Ariana
Lee, Yesun
Dien Bard, Jennifer
Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title_full Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title_fullStr Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title_full_unstemmed Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title_short Saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults
title_sort saliva is a promising alternative specimen for the detection of sars-cov-2 in children and adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33140064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.25.20219055
work_keys_str_mv AT yeerebecca salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT truongthao salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT pannarajpias salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT eubanksnatalie salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT gaiemily salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT jumarangjaycee salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT turnerlauren salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT peraltaariana salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT leeyesun salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults
AT dienbardjennifer salivaisapromisingalternativespecimenforthedetectionofsarscov2inchildrenandadults