Cargando…

Current trend of accreditation within medical education

Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahn, Ducksun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30
_version_ 1783604401920802816
author Ahn, Ducksun
author_facet Ahn, Ducksun
author_sort Ahn, Ducksun
collection PubMed
description Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME also actively spearheaded a project to recognize accrediting agencies within individual countries. The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME), with the 2 key concepts of entrusted professional activity and milestones, has enabled researchers to identify the relationships between patient outcomes and medical education. The recent data-driven approach to CBME has been used for ongoing quality improvement of trainees and training programs. The accreditation goal has shifted from the single purpose of quality assurance to balancing quality assurance and quality improvement. Although there are many types of postgraduate medical education (PGME), it may be possible to accredit resident programs on a global scale by adopting the concept of CBME. It will also be possible to achieve accreditation alignment for BME and PGME, which center on competency. This approach may also make it possible to measure accreditation outcomes against patient outcomes. Therefore, evidence of the advantages of costly and labor-consuming accreditation processes will be available soon, and quality improvement will be the driving force of the accreditation process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7605903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76059032020-11-05 Current trend of accreditation within medical education Ahn, Ducksun J Educ Eval Health Prof Review Currently, accreditation in medical education is a priority for many countries worldwide. The World Federation for Medical Education’s (WFME) launch of its 1st trilogy of standards in 2003 was a seminal event promoting accreditation in basic medical education (BME) globally. In parallel, the WFME also actively spearheaded a project to recognize accrediting agencies within individual countries. The introduction of competency-based medical education (CBME), with the 2 key concepts of entrusted professional activity and milestones, has enabled researchers to identify the relationships between patient outcomes and medical education. The recent data-driven approach to CBME has been used for ongoing quality improvement of trainees and training programs. The accreditation goal has shifted from the single purpose of quality assurance to balancing quality assurance and quality improvement. Although there are many types of postgraduate medical education (PGME), it may be possible to accredit resident programs on a global scale by adopting the concept of CBME. It will also be possible to achieve accreditation alignment for BME and PGME, which center on competency. This approach may also make it possible to measure accreditation outcomes against patient outcomes. Therefore, evidence of the advantages of costly and labor-consuming accreditation processes will be available soon, and quality improvement will be the driving force of the accreditation process. Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7605903/ /pubmed/33085997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30 Text en © 2020, Korea Health Personnel Licensing Examination Institute This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Ahn, Ducksun
Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title_full Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title_fullStr Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title_full_unstemmed Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title_short Current trend of accreditation within medical education
title_sort current trend of accreditation within medical education
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33085997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2020.17.30
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnducksun currenttrendofaccreditationwithinmedicaleducation