Cargando…

Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia

Patients with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia have substantially higher risk of mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate scoring systems that can predict the mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and bacteremia. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed among adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hung, Chi-Chieh, Hsu, Yin-Chou, Lin, Kuo-Hsuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8596567
_version_ 1783604407589404672
author Hung, Chi-Chieh
Hsu, Yin-Chou
Lin, Kuo-Hsuan
author_facet Hung, Chi-Chieh
Hsu, Yin-Chou
Lin, Kuo-Hsuan
author_sort Hung, Chi-Chieh
collection PubMed
description Patients with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia have substantially higher risk of mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate scoring systems that can predict the mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and bacteremia. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who visited the emergency department from January 2015 to December 2018. All patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia were enrolled and divided into survivor and nonsurvivor groups for comparison based on their 30-day in-hospital mortality event. The Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child–Pugh score, and quick sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score were calculated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. A total of 127 patients (survivor: 86; nonsurvivor: 41) were eligible for this study. Compared with the nonsurvivor group, patients in the survivor group had significantly lower MELD score (22 ± 7 vs. 29 ± 5, p < 0.001), lower proportion of high qSOFA (score ≥ 2) (23.3% vs. 51.2%, p < 0.01), and high PBS (score ≥ 4) (7.0% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001) category. There was also a significantly different distribution in Child–Pugh classification between the two groups (p < 0.01). The survivor group had significantly lower proportion of acute-on-chronic liver failure (27.9% vs. 68.3%, p < 0.001) and fewer number of organ failures (p < 0.001). In comparison of the discriminative ability in mortality risk prediction, PBS (AUROC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75–0.90, p < 0.001) and MELD scores (AUROC = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.86, p < 0.001) revealed a better predictive ability than Child–Pugh (AUROC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.70, p < 0.01) and qSOFA scores (AUROC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54–0.75, p < 0.01). PBS and MELD scores both demonstrated a superior ability of predicting mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with bacteremia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7605936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76059362020-11-05 Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia Hung, Chi-Chieh Hsu, Yin-Chou Lin, Kuo-Hsuan Emerg Med Int Research Article Patients with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia have substantially higher risk of mortality and morbidity. Our study aimed to investigate scoring systems that can predict the mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis and bacteremia. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed among adult patients who visited the emergency department from January 2015 to December 2018. All patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and bacteremia were enrolled and divided into survivor and nonsurvivor groups for comparison based on their 30-day in-hospital mortality event. The Pitt bacteremia score (PBS), model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child–Pugh score, and quick sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score were calculated and compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves. A total of 127 patients (survivor: 86; nonsurvivor: 41) were eligible for this study. Compared with the nonsurvivor group, patients in the survivor group had significantly lower MELD score (22 ± 7 vs. 29 ± 5, p < 0.001), lower proportion of high qSOFA (score ≥ 2) (23.3% vs. 51.2%, p < 0.01), and high PBS (score ≥ 4) (7.0% vs. 34.1%, p < 0.001) category. There was also a significantly different distribution in Child–Pugh classification between the two groups (p < 0.01). The survivor group had significantly lower proportion of acute-on-chronic liver failure (27.9% vs. 68.3%, p < 0.001) and fewer number of organ failures (p < 0.001). In comparison of the discriminative ability in mortality risk prediction, PBS (AUROC = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.75–0.90, p < 0.001) and MELD scores (AUROC = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.70–0.86, p < 0.001) revealed a better predictive ability than Child–Pugh (AUROC = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.59–0.70, p < 0.01) and qSOFA scores (AUROC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54–0.75, p < 0.01). PBS and MELD scores both demonstrated a superior ability of predicting mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with bacteremia. Hindawi 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7605936/ /pubmed/33163235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8596567 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chi-Chieh Hung et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hung, Chi-Chieh
Hsu, Yin-Chou
Lin, Kuo-Hsuan
Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title_full Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title_fullStr Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title_short Comparing Mortality Risk Predictive Ability of Different Scoring Systems in Cirrhotic Patients with Bacteremia
title_sort comparing mortality risk predictive ability of different scoring systems in cirrhotic patients with bacteremia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8596567
work_keys_str_mv AT hungchichieh comparingmortalityriskpredictiveabilityofdifferentscoringsystemsincirrhoticpatientswithbacteremia
AT hsuyinchou comparingmortalityriskpredictiveabilityofdifferentscoringsystemsincirrhoticpatientswithbacteremia
AT linkuohsuan comparingmortalityriskpredictiveabilityofdifferentscoringsystemsincirrhoticpatientswithbacteremia