Cargando…
Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures
BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stability assessment of 3 different constructs for proximal fixation of a locking compression plate (LCP) in treating a Worland type C periprosthetic fracture after total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: 27 Worland type C fractures after shoulder arthroplasty in synthetic hu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8872419 |
_version_ | 1783604407813799936 |
---|---|
author | Harb, Afif Welke, Bastian Liodakis, Emmanouil Razaeian, Sam Zhang, Dafang Krettek, Christian Hurschler, Christof Hawi, Nael |
author_facet | Harb, Afif Welke, Bastian Liodakis, Emmanouil Razaeian, Sam Zhang, Dafang Krettek, Christian Hurschler, Christof Hawi, Nael |
author_sort | Harb, Afif |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stability assessment of 3 different constructs for proximal fixation of a locking compression plate (LCP) in treating a Worland type C periprosthetic fracture after total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: 27 Worland type C fractures after shoulder arthroplasty in synthetic humeri were treated with 14-hole LCP that is proximally fixed using the following: (1) 1 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires and 2x unicortical-locking screws, (2) 3 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires, or (3) 2x bicortical-locking attachment plates. Torsional stiffness was assessed by applying an internal rotation moment of 5 Nm and then after unloading the specimen, an external rotation moment of 5 Nm at the same rate was applied. Axial stiffness was assessed by applying a 50 N preload, and then applying a cyclic load of 250 N, then increasing the load by 50 N each time, until a maximum axial load of 2500 N was reached or specimen failure occurred. RESULTS: With regard to internal as well as external rotational stiffness, group 1 showed a mean stiffness of 0.37 Nm/deg and 0.57 Nm/deg, respectively, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 0.51 Nm/deg and 0.39 Nm/deg, respectively, while group 3 had a mean stiffness of 1.34 Nm/deg and 1.31 Nm/deg, respectively. Concerning axial stiffness, group 1 showed an average stiffness of 451.0 N/mm, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 737.5 N/mm, whereas group 3 had a mean stiffness of 715.8 N/mm. CONCLUSION: Group 3 displayed a significantly higher torsional stiffness while a comparable axial stiffness to group 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7605937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76059372020-11-05 Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures Harb, Afif Welke, Bastian Liodakis, Emmanouil Razaeian, Sam Zhang, Dafang Krettek, Christian Hurschler, Christof Hawi, Nael Adv Orthop Research Article BACKGROUND: Biomechanical stability assessment of 3 different constructs for proximal fixation of a locking compression plate (LCP) in treating a Worland type C periprosthetic fracture after total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: 27 Worland type C fractures after shoulder arthroplasty in synthetic humeri were treated with 14-hole LCP that is proximally fixed using the following: (1) 1 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires and 2x unicortical-locking screws, (2) 3 × 1.5 mm cerclage wires, or (3) 2x bicortical-locking attachment plates. Torsional stiffness was assessed by applying an internal rotation moment of 5 Nm and then after unloading the specimen, an external rotation moment of 5 Nm at the same rate was applied. Axial stiffness was assessed by applying a 50 N preload, and then applying a cyclic load of 250 N, then increasing the load by 50 N each time, until a maximum axial load of 2500 N was reached or specimen failure occurred. RESULTS: With regard to internal as well as external rotational stiffness, group 1 showed a mean stiffness of 0.37 Nm/deg and 0.57 Nm/deg, respectively, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 0.51 Nm/deg and 0.39 Nm/deg, respectively, while group 3 had a mean stiffness of 1.34 Nm/deg and 1.31 Nm/deg, respectively. Concerning axial stiffness, group 1 showed an average stiffness of 451.0 N/mm, group 2 had a mean stiffness of 737.5 N/mm, whereas group 3 had a mean stiffness of 715.8 N/mm. CONCLUSION: Group 3 displayed a significantly higher torsional stiffness while a comparable axial stiffness to group 2. Hindawi 2020-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7605937/ /pubmed/33163236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8872419 Text en Copyright © 2020 Afif Harb et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Harb, Afif Welke, Bastian Liodakis, Emmanouil Razaeian, Sam Zhang, Dafang Krettek, Christian Hurschler, Christof Hawi, Nael Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title | Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title_full | Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title_short | Biomechanical Assessment of Three Osteosynthesis Constructs by Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures |
title_sort | biomechanical assessment of three osteosynthesis constructs by periprosthetic humerus fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7605937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8872419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harbafif biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT welkebastian biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT liodakisemmanouil biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT razaeiansam biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT zhangdafang biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT krettekchristian biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT hurschlerchristof biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures AT hawinael biomechanicalassessmentofthreeosteosynthesisconstructsbyperiprosthetichumerusfractures |