Cargando…

Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tunstall, Jay, Mueller, Karin, Sinfield, Oscar, Higgins, Helen Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781
_version_ 1783604492094144512
author Tunstall, Jay
Mueller, Karin
Sinfield, Oscar
Higgins, Helen Mary
author_facet Tunstall, Jay
Mueller, Karin
Sinfield, Oscar
Higgins, Helen Mary
author_sort Tunstall, Jay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle filmed walking on a firm surface. Eight veterinary researchers, eight clinicians and eight veterinary students were shown written descriptors of the scoring system and four video clips for training purposes, before being asked to score 40 video clips in a random order. Participants repeated this task 4 days later. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement (the same person scoring on different days) was acceptable with weighted mean Kappa values of 0.84, 0.81 and 0.84 respectively for researchers, clinicians and students. The inter-observer agreement (different people scoring the same animal) was acceptable with weighted Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient values of 0.70, 0.69 and 0.64 for researchers, clinicians and students. Most disagreement occurred over scores one (not lame but imperfect locomotion) and two (lame, but not severe). CONCLUSION: This scoring system has the potential to reliably score lameness in beef cattle and help facilitate lameness treatment and control; however, some disagreements will occur especially over scores one and two.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76064952020-11-12 Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice Tunstall, Jay Mueller, Karin Sinfield, Oscar Higgins, Helen Mary Vet Rec Original Research BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle filmed walking on a firm surface. Eight veterinary researchers, eight clinicians and eight veterinary students were shown written descriptors of the scoring system and four video clips for training purposes, before being asked to score 40 video clips in a random order. Participants repeated this task 4 days later. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement (the same person scoring on different days) was acceptable with weighted mean Kappa values of 0.84, 0.81 and 0.84 respectively for researchers, clinicians and students. The inter-observer agreement (different people scoring the same animal) was acceptable with weighted Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient values of 0.70, 0.69 and 0.64 for researchers, clinicians and students. Most disagreement occurred over scores one (not lame but imperfect locomotion) and two (lame, but not severe). CONCLUSION: This scoring system has the potential to reliably score lameness in beef cattle and help facilitate lameness treatment and control; however, some disagreements will occur especially over scores one and two. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-17 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7606495/ /pubmed/32917837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781 Text en © British Veterinary Association 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tunstall, Jay
Mueller, Karin
Sinfield, Oscar
Higgins, Helen Mary
Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title_full Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title_fullStr Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title_short Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
title_sort reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781
work_keys_str_mv AT tunstalljay reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice
AT muellerkarin reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice
AT sinfieldoscar reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice
AT higginshelenmary reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice