Cargando…
Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice
BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781 |
_version_ | 1783604492094144512 |
---|---|
author | Tunstall, Jay Mueller, Karin Sinfield, Oscar Higgins, Helen Mary |
author_facet | Tunstall, Jay Mueller, Karin Sinfield, Oscar Higgins, Helen Mary |
author_sort | Tunstall, Jay |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle filmed walking on a firm surface. Eight veterinary researchers, eight clinicians and eight veterinary students were shown written descriptors of the scoring system and four video clips for training purposes, before being asked to score 40 video clips in a random order. Participants repeated this task 4 days later. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement (the same person scoring on different days) was acceptable with weighted mean Kappa values of 0.84, 0.81 and 0.84 respectively for researchers, clinicians and students. The inter-observer agreement (different people scoring the same animal) was acceptable with weighted Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient values of 0.70, 0.69 and 0.64 for researchers, clinicians and students. Most disagreement occurred over scores one (not lame but imperfect locomotion) and two (lame, but not severe). CONCLUSION: This scoring system has the potential to reliably score lameness in beef cattle and help facilitate lameness treatment and control; however, some disagreements will occur especially over scores one and two. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7606495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76064952020-11-12 Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice Tunstall, Jay Mueller, Karin Sinfield, Oscar Higgins, Helen Mary Vet Rec Original Research BACKGROUND: Locomotion (lameness) scoring has been used and studied in the dairy industry; however, to the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies assessing the reliability of locomotion scoring systems when used with beef cattle. METHODS: A four-point scoring system was developed and beef cattle filmed walking on a firm surface. Eight veterinary researchers, eight clinicians and eight veterinary students were shown written descriptors of the scoring system and four video clips for training purposes, before being asked to score 40 video clips in a random order. Participants repeated this task 4 days later. RESULTS: The intra-observer agreement (the same person scoring on different days) was acceptable with weighted mean Kappa values of 0.84, 0.81 and 0.84 respectively for researchers, clinicians and students. The inter-observer agreement (different people scoring the same animal) was acceptable with weighted Gwet’s Agreement Coefficient values of 0.70, 0.69 and 0.64 for researchers, clinicians and students. Most disagreement occurred over scores one (not lame but imperfect locomotion) and two (lame, but not severe). CONCLUSION: This scoring system has the potential to reliably score lameness in beef cattle and help facilitate lameness treatment and control; however, some disagreements will occur especially over scores one and two. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-10-17 2020-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7606495/ /pubmed/32917837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781 Text en © British Veterinary Association 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tunstall, Jay Mueller, Karin Sinfield, Oscar Higgins, Helen Mary Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title | Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title_full | Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title_short | Reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
title_sort | reliability of a beef cattle locomotion scoring system for use in clinical practice |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32917837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.105781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tunstalljay reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice AT muellerkarin reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice AT sinfieldoscar reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice AT higginshelenmary reliabilityofabeefcattlelocomotionscoringsystemforuseinclinicalpractice |