Cargando…

Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range

Background: For adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, impaired temporal processing of simultaneity/successiveness has been frequently reported although interval timing has been investigated in neither adult nor pediatric MS patients. We aim to extend previous research in two ways. First, we focus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Troche, Stefan J., Kapanci, Tugba, Rammsayer, Thomas H., Kesseler, Carl P. A., Häusler, Martin Georg, Geis, Tobias, Schimmel, Mareike, Elpers, Christiane, Kreth, Jonas H., Thiels, Charlotte, Rostásy, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.575780
_version_ 1783604494879162368
author Troche, Stefan J.
Kapanci, Tugba
Rammsayer, Thomas H.
Kesseler, Carl P. A.
Häusler, Martin Georg
Geis, Tobias
Schimmel, Mareike
Elpers, Christiane
Kreth, Jonas H.
Thiels, Charlotte
Rostásy, Kevin
author_facet Troche, Stefan J.
Kapanci, Tugba
Rammsayer, Thomas H.
Kesseler, Carl P. A.
Häusler, Martin Georg
Geis, Tobias
Schimmel, Mareike
Elpers, Christiane
Kreth, Jonas H.
Thiels, Charlotte
Rostásy, Kevin
author_sort Troche, Stefan J.
collection PubMed
description Background: For adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, impaired temporal processing of simultaneity/successiveness has been frequently reported although interval timing has been investigated in neither adult nor pediatric MS patients. We aim to extend previous research in two ways. First, we focus on interval timing (instead of simultaneity/successiveness) and differentiate between sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range and cognitive processing of intervals in the one-second range. Second, we investigate whether impaired temporal information processing would also be observable in pediatric MS patients' interval timing in the subsecond and one-second ranges. Methods: Participants were 22 pediatric MS patients and 22 healthy controls, matched for age, gender, and psychometric intelligence as measured by the Culture Fair Test 20-R. They completed two auditory interval-timing tasks with stimuli in the subsecond and one-second ranges, respectively, as well as a frequency discrimination task. Results: Pediatric MS patients showed impaired interval timing in the subsecond range compared to healthy controls with a mean difference of the difference limen (DL) of 6.3 ms, 95% CI [1.7, 10.9 ms] and an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.830. The two groups did not differ significantly in interval timing in the one-second range (mean difference of the DL = 26.9 ms, 95% CI [−14.2, 67.9 ms], Cohen's d = 0.399) or in frequency discrimination (mean difference of the DL = 0.4 Hz, 95% CI [−1.1, 1.9 Hz], Cohen's d = 0.158). Conclusion: The results indicate that, in particular, the sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range but not the cognitive processing of longer intervals is impaired in pediatric MS patients. This differential pattern of results is unlikely to be explained by general deficits of auditory information processing. A tentative explanation, to be tested in future studies, points to subcortical deficits in pediatric MS patients, which might also underlie deficits in speech and visuomotor coordination typically reported in pediatric MS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76065092020-11-13 Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range Troche, Stefan J. Kapanci, Tugba Rammsayer, Thomas H. Kesseler, Carl P. A. Häusler, Martin Georg Geis, Tobias Schimmel, Mareike Elpers, Christiane Kreth, Jonas H. Thiels, Charlotte Rostásy, Kevin Front Neurol Neurology Background: For adult multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, impaired temporal processing of simultaneity/successiveness has been frequently reported although interval timing has been investigated in neither adult nor pediatric MS patients. We aim to extend previous research in two ways. First, we focus on interval timing (instead of simultaneity/successiveness) and differentiate between sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range and cognitive processing of intervals in the one-second range. Second, we investigate whether impaired temporal information processing would also be observable in pediatric MS patients' interval timing in the subsecond and one-second ranges. Methods: Participants were 22 pediatric MS patients and 22 healthy controls, matched for age, gender, and psychometric intelligence as measured by the Culture Fair Test 20-R. They completed two auditory interval-timing tasks with stimuli in the subsecond and one-second ranges, respectively, as well as a frequency discrimination task. Results: Pediatric MS patients showed impaired interval timing in the subsecond range compared to healthy controls with a mean difference of the difference limen (DL) of 6.3 ms, 95% CI [1.7, 10.9 ms] and an effect size of Cohen's d = 0.830. The two groups did not differ significantly in interval timing in the one-second range (mean difference of the DL = 26.9 ms, 95% CI [−14.2, 67.9 ms], Cohen's d = 0.399) or in frequency discrimination (mean difference of the DL = 0.4 Hz, 95% CI [−1.1, 1.9 Hz], Cohen's d = 0.158). Conclusion: The results indicate that, in particular, the sensory-automatic processing of intervals in the subsecond range but not the cognitive processing of longer intervals is impaired in pediatric MS patients. This differential pattern of results is unlikely to be explained by general deficits of auditory information processing. A tentative explanation, to be tested in future studies, points to subcortical deficits in pediatric MS patients, which might also underlie deficits in speech and visuomotor coordination typically reported in pediatric MS patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7606509/ /pubmed/33193026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.575780 Text en Copyright © 2020 Troche, Kapanci, Rammsayer, Kesseler, Häusler, Geis, Schimmel, Elpers, Kreth, Thiels and Rostásy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Troche, Stefan J.
Kapanci, Tugba
Rammsayer, Thomas H.
Kesseler, Carl P. A.
Häusler, Martin Georg
Geis, Tobias
Schimmel, Mareike
Elpers, Christiane
Kreth, Jonas H.
Thiels, Charlotte
Rostásy, Kevin
Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title_full Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title_fullStr Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title_full_unstemmed Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title_short Interval Timing in Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis: Impaired in the Subsecond Range but Unimpaired in the One-Second Range
title_sort interval timing in pediatric multiple sclerosis: impaired in the subsecond range but unimpaired in the one-second range
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.575780
work_keys_str_mv AT trochestefanj intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT kapancitugba intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT rammsayerthomash intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT kesselercarlpa intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT hauslermartingeorg intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT geistobias intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT schimmelmareike intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT elperschristiane intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT krethjonash intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT thielscharlotte intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange
AT rostasykevin intervaltiminginpediatricmultiplesclerosisimpairedinthesubsecondrangebutunimpairedintheonesecondrange