Cargando…

Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare disease, but it is amongst the most lethal cancers with a median survival under 1 year. Variations in DNA methylation and gene expression have been extensively studied in other cancers for their role in pathogenesis and disease prognosis, but these stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Nitish Kumar, Niu, Meng, Southekal, Siddesh, Bajpai, Prachi, Elkholy, Amr, Manne, Upender, Guda, Chittibabu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.522125
_version_ 1783604511232753664
author Mishra, Nitish Kumar
Niu, Meng
Southekal, Siddesh
Bajpai, Prachi
Elkholy, Amr
Manne, Upender
Guda, Chittibabu
author_facet Mishra, Nitish Kumar
Niu, Meng
Southekal, Siddesh
Bajpai, Prachi
Elkholy, Amr
Manne, Upender
Guda, Chittibabu
author_sort Mishra, Nitish Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare disease, but it is amongst the most lethal cancers with a median survival under 1 year. Variations in DNA methylation and gene expression have been extensively studied in other cancers for their role in pathogenesis and disease prognosis, but these studies are very limited in CCA. This study focusses on the identification of DNA methylation and gene expression prognostic biomarkers using multi-omics data of CCA tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHOD: We have conducted a genome-wide analysis of differential DNA methylation and gene/miRNA expression using data from 36 CCA tumor and 9 normal samples from TCGA. The impact of DNA methylation in promoters and long-range distal enhancers on the regulation and expression of CCA-associated genes was examined using linear regression. Next, we conducted network analyses on genes which are regulated by DNA methylation as well as by miRNA. Finally, we performed Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in order to identify the role of selected methylation sites and specific genes and miRNAs in patient survival. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to confirm the change in gene expression in CCA patients’ tumor and adjacent normal samples. RESULTS: Altered DNA methylation was observed on 12,259 CpGs across all chromosomes, of which 78% were hypermethylated. We observed a strong negative relationship between promoter hypermethylation and corresponding gene expression in 92% of the CpGs. Differential expression analyses revealed altered expression patterns in 3,305 genes and 101 miRNAs. Finally, we identified 17 differentially methylated promoter CpGs, 72 differentially expressed genes, and two miRNAs that are likely associated with patient survival. Pathway analysis suggested that cell division, bile secretion, amino acid metabolism, PPAR signaling, hippo signaling were highly affected by gene expression and DNA methylation alterations. The qPCR analysis further confirmed that MDK, HNF1B, PACS1, and GLUD1 are differentially expressed in CCA. CONCLUSION: Based on the survival analysis, we conclude that DEPDC1, FUT4, MDK, PACS1, PIWIL4 genes, miR-22, miR-551b microRNAs, and cg27362525 and cg26597242 CpGs can strongly support their use as prognostic markers of CCA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76067332020-11-13 Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles Mishra, Nitish Kumar Niu, Meng Southekal, Siddesh Bajpai, Prachi Elkholy, Amr Manne, Upender Guda, Chittibabu Front Genet Genetics BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare disease, but it is amongst the most lethal cancers with a median survival under 1 year. Variations in DNA methylation and gene expression have been extensively studied in other cancers for their role in pathogenesis and disease prognosis, but these studies are very limited in CCA. This study focusses on the identification of DNA methylation and gene expression prognostic biomarkers using multi-omics data of CCA tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). METHOD: We have conducted a genome-wide analysis of differential DNA methylation and gene/miRNA expression using data from 36 CCA tumor and 9 normal samples from TCGA. The impact of DNA methylation in promoters and long-range distal enhancers on the regulation and expression of CCA-associated genes was examined using linear regression. Next, we conducted network analyses on genes which are regulated by DNA methylation as well as by miRNA. Finally, we performed Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in order to identify the role of selected methylation sites and specific genes and miRNAs in patient survival. We also performed real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) to confirm the change in gene expression in CCA patients’ tumor and adjacent normal samples. RESULTS: Altered DNA methylation was observed on 12,259 CpGs across all chromosomes, of which 78% were hypermethylated. We observed a strong negative relationship between promoter hypermethylation and corresponding gene expression in 92% of the CpGs. Differential expression analyses revealed altered expression patterns in 3,305 genes and 101 miRNAs. Finally, we identified 17 differentially methylated promoter CpGs, 72 differentially expressed genes, and two miRNAs that are likely associated with patient survival. Pathway analysis suggested that cell division, bile secretion, amino acid metabolism, PPAR signaling, hippo signaling were highly affected by gene expression and DNA methylation alterations. The qPCR analysis further confirmed that MDK, HNF1B, PACS1, and GLUD1 are differentially expressed in CCA. CONCLUSION: Based on the survival analysis, we conclude that DEPDC1, FUT4, MDK, PACS1, PIWIL4 genes, miR-22, miR-551b microRNAs, and cg27362525 and cg26597242 CpGs can strongly support their use as prognostic markers of CCA. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7606733/ /pubmed/33193605 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.522125 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mishra, Niu, Southekal, Bajpai, Elkholy, Manne and Guda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Mishra, Nitish Kumar
Niu, Meng
Southekal, Siddesh
Bajpai, Prachi
Elkholy, Amr
Manne, Upender
Guda, Chittibabu
Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title_full Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title_fullStr Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title_short Identification of Prognostic Markers in Cholangiocarcinoma Using Altered DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Profiles
title_sort identification of prognostic markers in cholangiocarcinoma using altered dna methylation and gene expression profiles
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33193605
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.522125
work_keys_str_mv AT mishranitishkumar identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT niumeng identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT southekalsiddesh identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT bajpaiprachi identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT elkholyamr identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT manneupender identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles
AT gudachittibabu identificationofprognosticmarkersincholangiocarcinomausingaltereddnamethylationandgeneexpressionprofiles