Cargando…

Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of treatments in early-onset psychosis is sparse. Current guidance for the treatment of early-onset psychosis is mostly extrapolated from trials in adult populations. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended evaluation of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morrison, Anthony P, Pyle, Melissa, Maughan, Daniel, Johns, Louise, Freeman, Daniel, Broome, Matthew R, Husain, Nusrat, Fowler, David, Hudson, Jemma, MacLennan, Graeme, Norrie, John, Shiers, David, Hollis, Chris, James, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32649925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0
_version_ 1783604532854390784
author Morrison, Anthony P
Pyle, Melissa
Maughan, Daniel
Johns, Louise
Freeman, Daniel
Broome, Matthew R
Husain, Nusrat
Fowler, David
Hudson, Jemma
MacLennan, Graeme
Norrie, John
Shiers, David
Hollis, Chris
James, Anthony
author_facet Morrison, Anthony P
Pyle, Melissa
Maughan, Daniel
Johns, Louise
Freeman, Daniel
Broome, Matthew R
Husain, Nusrat
Fowler, David
Hudson, Jemma
MacLennan, Graeme
Norrie, John
Shiers, David
Hollis, Chris
James, Anthony
author_sort Morrison, Anthony P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of treatments in early-onset psychosis is sparse. Current guidance for the treatment of early-onset psychosis is mostly extrapolated from trials in adult populations. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs versus psychological intervention (cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT] and family intervention) versus the combination of these treatments for early-onset psychosis. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of antipsychotic monotherapy, psychological intervention monotherapy, and antipsychotics plus psychological intervention in adolescents with first-episode psychosis. METHODS: We did a multicentre pilot and feasibility trial according to a randomised, single-blind, three-arm, controlled design. We recruited participants from seven UK National Health Service Trust sites. Participants were aged 14–18 years; help-seeking; had presented with first-episode psychosis in the past year; were under the care of a psychiatrist; were showing current psychotic symptoms; and met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder, or met the entry criteria for an early intervention for psychosis service. Participants were assigned (1:1:1) to antipsychotics, psychological intervention (CBT with optional family intervention), or antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. Randomisation was via a web-based randomisation system, with permuted blocks of random size, stratified by centre and family contact. CBT incorporated up to 26 sessions over 6 months plus up to four booster sessions, and family intervention incorporated up to six sessions over 6 months. Choice and dose of antipsychotic were at the discretion of the treating consultant psychiatrist. Participants were followed up for a maximum of 12 months. The primary outcome was feasibility (ie, data on trial referral and recruitment, session attendance or medication adherence, retention, and treatment acceptability) and the proposed primary efficacy outcome was total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at 6 months. Primary outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. Safety outcomes were reported according to as-treated status, for all patients who had received at least one session of CBT or family intervention, or at least one dose of antipsychotics. The study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN80567433. FINDINGS: Of 101 patients referred to the study, 61 patients (mean age 16·3 years [SD 1·3]) were recruited from April 10, 2017, to Oct 31, 2018, 18 of whom were randomly assigned to psychological intervention, 22 to antipsychotics, and 21 to antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. The trial recruitment rate was 68% of our target sample size of 90 participants. The study had a low referral to recruitment ratio (around 2:1), a high rate of retention (51 [84%] participants retained at the 6-month primary endpoint), a high rate of adherence to psychological intervention (defined as six or more sessions of CBT; in 32 [82%] of 39 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups), and a moderate rate of adherence to antipsychotic medication (defined as at least 6 consecutive weeks of exposure to antipsychotics; in 28 [65%] of 43 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups). Mean scores for PANSS total at the 6-month primary endpoint were 68·6 (SD 17·3) for antipsychotic monotherapy (6·2 points lower than at randomisation), 59·8 (13·7) for psychological intervention (13·1 points lower than at randomisation), and 62·0 (15·9) for antipsychotics plus psychological intervention (13·9 points lower than at randomisation). A good clinical response at 6 months (defined as ≥50% improvement in PANSS total score) was achieved in four (22%) of 18 patients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy, five (31%) of 16 receiving psychological intervention, and five (29%) of 17 receiving antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. In as-treated groups, serious adverse events occurred in eight [35%] of 23 patients in the combined group, two [13%] of 15 in the antipsychotics group, four [24%] of 17 in the psychological intervention group, and four [80%] of five who did not receive any treatment. No serious adverse events were considered to be related to participation in the trial. INTERPRETATION: This trial is the first to show that a head-to-head clinical trial comparing psychological intervention, antipsychotics, and their combination is safe in young people with first-episode psychosis. However, the feasibility of a larger trial is unclear because of site-specific recruitment challenges, and amendments to trial design would be needed for an adequately powered clinical and cost-effectiveness trial that provides robust evidence. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76069142020-11-06 Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study Morrison, Anthony P Pyle, Melissa Maughan, Daniel Johns, Louise Freeman, Daniel Broome, Matthew R Husain, Nusrat Fowler, David Hudson, Jemma MacLennan, Graeme Norrie, John Shiers, David Hollis, Chris James, Anthony Lancet Psychiatry Articles BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of treatments in early-onset psychosis is sparse. Current guidance for the treatment of early-onset psychosis is mostly extrapolated from trials in adult populations. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has recommended evaluation of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs versus psychological intervention (cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT] and family intervention) versus the combination of these treatments for early-onset psychosis. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of antipsychotic monotherapy, psychological intervention monotherapy, and antipsychotics plus psychological intervention in adolescents with first-episode psychosis. METHODS: We did a multicentre pilot and feasibility trial according to a randomised, single-blind, three-arm, controlled design. We recruited participants from seven UK National Health Service Trust sites. Participants were aged 14–18 years; help-seeking; had presented with first-episode psychosis in the past year; were under the care of a psychiatrist; were showing current psychotic symptoms; and met ICD-10 criteria for schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or delusional disorder, or met the entry criteria for an early intervention for psychosis service. Participants were assigned (1:1:1) to antipsychotics, psychological intervention (CBT with optional family intervention), or antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. Randomisation was via a web-based randomisation system, with permuted blocks of random size, stratified by centre and family contact. CBT incorporated up to 26 sessions over 6 months plus up to four booster sessions, and family intervention incorporated up to six sessions over 6 months. Choice and dose of antipsychotic were at the discretion of the treating consultant psychiatrist. Participants were followed up for a maximum of 12 months. The primary outcome was feasibility (ie, data on trial referral and recruitment, session attendance or medication adherence, retention, and treatment acceptability) and the proposed primary efficacy outcome was total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at 6 months. Primary outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. Safety outcomes were reported according to as-treated status, for all patients who had received at least one session of CBT or family intervention, or at least one dose of antipsychotics. The study was prospectively registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN80567433. FINDINGS: Of 101 patients referred to the study, 61 patients (mean age 16·3 years [SD 1·3]) were recruited from April 10, 2017, to Oct 31, 2018, 18 of whom were randomly assigned to psychological intervention, 22 to antipsychotics, and 21 to antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. The trial recruitment rate was 68% of our target sample size of 90 participants. The study had a low referral to recruitment ratio (around 2:1), a high rate of retention (51 [84%] participants retained at the 6-month primary endpoint), a high rate of adherence to psychological intervention (defined as six or more sessions of CBT; in 32 [82%] of 39 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups), and a moderate rate of adherence to antipsychotic medication (defined as at least 6 consecutive weeks of exposure to antipsychotics; in 28 [65%] of 43 participants in the monotherapy and combined groups). Mean scores for PANSS total at the 6-month primary endpoint were 68·6 (SD 17·3) for antipsychotic monotherapy (6·2 points lower than at randomisation), 59·8 (13·7) for psychological intervention (13·1 points lower than at randomisation), and 62·0 (15·9) for antipsychotics plus psychological intervention (13·9 points lower than at randomisation). A good clinical response at 6 months (defined as ≥50% improvement in PANSS total score) was achieved in four (22%) of 18 patients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy, five (31%) of 16 receiving psychological intervention, and five (29%) of 17 receiving antipsychotics plus psychological intervention. In as-treated groups, serious adverse events occurred in eight [35%] of 23 patients in the combined group, two [13%] of 15 in the antipsychotics group, four [24%] of 17 in the psychological intervention group, and four [80%] of five who did not receive any treatment. No serious adverse events were considered to be related to participation in the trial. INTERPRETATION: This trial is the first to show that a head-to-head clinical trial comparing psychological intervention, antipsychotics, and their combination is safe in young people with first-episode psychosis. However, the feasibility of a larger trial is unclear because of site-specific recruitment challenges, and amendments to trial design would be needed for an adequately powered clinical and cost-effectiveness trial that provides robust evidence. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research. Elsevier 2020-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7606914/ /pubmed/32649925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Morrison, Anthony P
Pyle, Melissa
Maughan, Daniel
Johns, Louise
Freeman, Daniel
Broome, Matthew R
Husain, Nusrat
Fowler, David
Hudson, Jemma
MacLennan, Graeme
Norrie, John
Shiers, David
Hollis, Chris
James, Anthony
Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title_full Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title_fullStr Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title_short Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
title_sort antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (maps): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32649925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30248-0
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisonanthonyp antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT pylemelissa antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT maughandaniel antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT johnslouise antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT freemandaniel antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT broomematthewr antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT husainnusrat antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT fowlerdavid antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT hudsonjemma antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT maclennangraeme antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT norriejohn antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT shiersdavid antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT hollischris antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT jamesanthony antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy
AT antipsychoticmedicationversuspsychologicalinterventionversusacombinationofbothinadolescentswithfirstepisodepsychosismapsamulticentrethreearmrandomisedcontrolledpilotandfeasibilitystudy