Cargando…

Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently surfaced as a research topic in dermatology and dermatopathology. In a recent survey, dermatologists were overall positive toward a development with an increased use of AI, but little is known about the corresponding attitudes among pathologists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polesie, Sam, McKee, Phillip H., Gardner, Jerad M., Gillstedt, Martin, Siarov, Jan, Neittaanmäki, Noora, Paoli, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195357
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.591952
_version_ 1783604548900749312
author Polesie, Sam
McKee, Phillip H.
Gardner, Jerad M.
Gillstedt, Martin
Siarov, Jan
Neittaanmäki, Noora
Paoli, John
author_facet Polesie, Sam
McKee, Phillip H.
Gardner, Jerad M.
Gillstedt, Martin
Siarov, Jan
Neittaanmäki, Noora
Paoli, John
author_sort Polesie, Sam
collection PubMed
description Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently surfaced as a research topic in dermatology and dermatopathology. In a recent survey, dermatologists were overall positive toward a development with an increased use of AI, but little is known about the corresponding attitudes among pathologists working with dermatopathology. The objective of this investigation was to make an inventory of these attitudes. Participants and Methods: An anonymous and voluntary online survey was prepared and distributed to pathologists who regularly analyzed dermatopathology slides/images. The survey consisted of 39 question divided in five sections; (1) AI as a topic in pathology; (2) previous exposure to AI as a topic in general; (3) applications for AI in dermatopathology; (4) feelings and attitudes toward AI and (5) self-reported tech-savviness and demographics. The survey opened on March 13, 2020 and closed on May 5, 2020. Results: Overall, 718 responders (64.1% females) representing 91 countries were analyzed. While 81.5% of responders were aware of AI as an emerging topic in pathology, only 18.8% had either good or excellent knowledge about AI. In terms of diagnosis classification, 42.6% saw strong or very strong potential for automated suggestion of skin tumor diagnoses. The corresponding figure for inflammatory skin diseases was 23.0% (P(adj) < 0.0001). For specific applications, the highest potential was considered for automated detection of mitosis (79.2%), automated suggestion of tumor margins (62.1%) and immunostaining evaluation (62.7%). The potential for automated suggestion of immunostaining (37.6%) and genetic panels (48.3%) were lower. Age did not impact the overall attitudes toward AI. Only 6.0% of the responders agreed or strongly agreed that the human pathologist will be replaced by AI in the foreseeable future. For the entire group, 72.3% agreed or strongly agreed that AI will improve dermatopathology and 84.1% thought that AI should be a part of medical training. Conclusions: Pathologists are generally optimistic about the impact and potential benefit of AI in dermatopathology. The highest potential is expected for narrow specified tasks rather than a global automated suggestion of diagnoses. There is a strong need for education about AI and its use within dermatopathology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7606983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76069832020-11-13 Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey Polesie, Sam McKee, Phillip H. Gardner, Jerad M. Gillstedt, Martin Siarov, Jan Neittaanmäki, Noora Paoli, John Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently surfaced as a research topic in dermatology and dermatopathology. In a recent survey, dermatologists were overall positive toward a development with an increased use of AI, but little is known about the corresponding attitudes among pathologists working with dermatopathology. The objective of this investigation was to make an inventory of these attitudes. Participants and Methods: An anonymous and voluntary online survey was prepared and distributed to pathologists who regularly analyzed dermatopathology slides/images. The survey consisted of 39 question divided in five sections; (1) AI as a topic in pathology; (2) previous exposure to AI as a topic in general; (3) applications for AI in dermatopathology; (4) feelings and attitudes toward AI and (5) self-reported tech-savviness and demographics. The survey opened on March 13, 2020 and closed on May 5, 2020. Results: Overall, 718 responders (64.1% females) representing 91 countries were analyzed. While 81.5% of responders were aware of AI as an emerging topic in pathology, only 18.8% had either good or excellent knowledge about AI. In terms of diagnosis classification, 42.6% saw strong or very strong potential for automated suggestion of skin tumor diagnoses. The corresponding figure for inflammatory skin diseases was 23.0% (P(adj) < 0.0001). For specific applications, the highest potential was considered for automated detection of mitosis (79.2%), automated suggestion of tumor margins (62.1%) and immunostaining evaluation (62.7%). The potential for automated suggestion of immunostaining (37.6%) and genetic panels (48.3%) were lower. Age did not impact the overall attitudes toward AI. Only 6.0% of the responders agreed or strongly agreed that the human pathologist will be replaced by AI in the foreseeable future. For the entire group, 72.3% agreed or strongly agreed that AI will improve dermatopathology and 84.1% thought that AI should be a part of medical training. Conclusions: Pathologists are generally optimistic about the impact and potential benefit of AI in dermatopathology. The highest potential is expected for narrow specified tasks rather than a global automated suggestion of diagnoses. There is a strong need for education about AI and its use within dermatopathology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7606983/ /pubmed/33195357 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.591952 Text en Copyright © 2020 Polesie, McKee, Gardner, Gillstedt, Siarov, Neittaanmäki and Paoli. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Polesie, Sam
McKee, Phillip H.
Gardner, Jerad M.
Gillstedt, Martin
Siarov, Jan
Neittaanmäki, Noora
Paoli, John
Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title_full Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title_fullStr Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title_short Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Within Dermatopathology: An International Online Survey
title_sort attitudes toward artificial intelligence within dermatopathology: an international online survey
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7606983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33195357
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.591952
work_keys_str_mv AT polesiesam attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT mckeephilliph attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT gardnerjeradm attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT gillstedtmartin attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT siarovjan attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT neittaanmakinoora attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey
AT paolijohn attitudestowardartificialintelligencewithindermatopathologyaninternationalonlinesurvey