Cargando…
Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiotherapy (RT). However, geometric distortions are a known challenge of using MRI in RT. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of a national audit of MRI geometric distortions. This was achieved...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004 |
_version_ | 1783604670138155008 |
---|---|
author | Alzahrani, Meshal Broadbent, David A Chuter, Robert Al-Qaisieh, Bashar Jackson, Steven Michael, Hutton Johnstone, Robert I Shah, Simon Wetscherek, Andreas Chick, H. Joan Wyatt, Jonathan J McCallum, Hazel Mhairi Speight, Richard |
author_facet | Alzahrani, Meshal Broadbent, David A Chuter, Robert Al-Qaisieh, Bashar Jackson, Steven Michael, Hutton Johnstone, Robert I Shah, Simon Wetscherek, Andreas Chick, H. Joan Wyatt, Jonathan J McCallum, Hazel Mhairi Speight, Richard |
author_sort | Alzahrani, Meshal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiotherapy (RT). However, geometric distortions are a known challenge of using MRI in RT. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of a national audit of MRI geometric distortions. This was achieved by assessing large field of view (FOV) MRI distortions on a number of scanners used clinically for RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI scans of a large FOV MRI geometric distortion phantom were acquired on 11 MRI scanners that are used clinically for RT in the UK. The mean and maximum distortions and variance between scanners were reported at different distances from the isocentre. RESULTS: For a small FOV representing a brain (100–150 mm from isocentre) all distortions were < 2 mm except for the maximum distortion of one scanner. For a large FOV representing a head and neck/pelvis (200–250 mm from isocentre) mean distortions were < 2 mm except for one scanner, maximum distortions were > 10 mm in some cases. The variance between scanners was low and was found to increase with distance from isocentre. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated feasibility of the technique to be repeated in a country wide geometric distortion audit of all MRI scanners used clinically for RT. Recommendations were made for performing such an audit and how to derive acceptable limits of distortion in such an audit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7607582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76075822020-11-06 Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy Alzahrani, Meshal Broadbent, David A Chuter, Robert Al-Qaisieh, Bashar Jackson, Steven Michael, Hutton Johnstone, Robert I Shah, Simon Wetscherek, Andreas Chick, H. Joan Wyatt, Jonathan J McCallum, Hazel Mhairi Speight, Richard Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly being used in radiotherapy (RT). However, geometric distortions are a known challenge of using MRI in RT. The aim of this study was to demonstrate feasibility of a national audit of MRI geometric distortions. This was achieved by assessing large field of view (FOV) MRI distortions on a number of scanners used clinically for RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI scans of a large FOV MRI geometric distortion phantom were acquired on 11 MRI scanners that are used clinically for RT in the UK. The mean and maximum distortions and variance between scanners were reported at different distances from the isocentre. RESULTS: For a small FOV representing a brain (100–150 mm from isocentre) all distortions were < 2 mm except for the maximum distortion of one scanner. For a large FOV representing a head and neck/pelvis (200–250 mm from isocentre) mean distortions were < 2 mm except for one scanner, maximum distortions were > 10 mm in some cases. The variance between scanners was low and was found to increase with distance from isocentre. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated feasibility of the technique to be repeated in a country wide geometric distortion audit of all MRI scanners used clinically for RT. Recommendations were made for performing such an audit and how to derive acceptable limits of distortion in such an audit. Elsevier 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7607582/ /pubmed/33163632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Alzahrani, Meshal Broadbent, David A Chuter, Robert Al-Qaisieh, Bashar Jackson, Steven Michael, Hutton Johnstone, Robert I Shah, Simon Wetscherek, Andreas Chick, H. Joan Wyatt, Jonathan J McCallum, Hazel Mhairi Speight, Richard Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title | Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title_full | Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title_short | Audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
title_sort | audit feasibility for geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33163632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2020.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alzahranimeshal auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT broadbentdavida auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT chuterrobert auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT alqaisiehbashar auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT jacksonsteven auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT michaelhutton auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT johnstoneroberti auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT shahsimon auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT wetscherekandreas auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT chickhjoan auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT wyattjonathanj auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT mccallumhazelmhairi auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy AT speightrichard auditfeasibilityforgeometricdistortioninmagneticresonanceimagingforradiotherapy |