Cargando…

Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottey, Laura, Roberts, Tom, Graham, Blair, Horner, Daniel, Stevens, Kara Nicola, Enki, Doyo, Lyttle, Mark David, Latour, Jos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33139301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485
_version_ 1783604671770787840
author Cottey, Laura
Roberts, Tom
Graham, Blair
Horner, Daniel
Stevens, Kara Nicola
Enki, Doyo
Lyttle, Mark David
Latour, Jos
author_facet Cottey, Laura
Roberts, Tom
Graham, Blair
Horner, Daniel
Stevens, Kara Nicola
Enki, Doyo
Lyttle, Mark David
Latour, Jos
author_sort Cottey, Laura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency physicians, defined as any registered physician working principally within the ED, responding between June and July 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NFR Scale, an 11-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses how work demands affect intershift recovery. RESULTS: The median NFR Score for all 4247 eligible, consented participants with a valid NFR Score was 70.0 (95% CI: 65.5 to 74.5), with an IQR of 45.5–90.0. A linear regression model indicated statistically significant associations between gender, health conditions, type of ED, clinical grade, access to annual and study leave, and time spent working out-of-hours. Groups including male physicians, consultants, general practitioners (GPs) within the ED, those working in paediatric EDs and those with no long-term health condition or disability had a lower NFR Score. After adjusting for these characteristics, the NFR Score increased by 3.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 7.1) and 6.43 (95% CI: 2.0 to 10.8) for those with difficulty accessing annual and study leave, respectively. Increased percentage of out-of-hours work increased NFR Score almost linearly: 26%–50% out-of-hours work=5.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 8.4); 51%–75% out-of-hours work=10.3 (95% CI: 7.6 to 13.0); 76%–100% out-of-hours work=14.5 (95% CI: 11.0 to 17.9). CONCLUSION: Higher NFR scores were observed among emergency physicians than reported in any other profession or population to date. While out-of-hours working is unavoidable, the linear relationship observed suggests that any reduction may result in NFR improvement. Evidence-based strategies to improve well-being such as proportional out-of-hours working and improved access to annual and study leave should be carefully considered and implemented where feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76075962020-11-12 Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey Cottey, Laura Roberts, Tom Graham, Blair Horner, Daniel Stevens, Kara Nicola Enki, Doyo Lyttle, Mark David Latour, Jos BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency physicians, defined as any registered physician working principally within the ED, responding between June and July 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NFR Scale, an 11-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses how work demands affect intershift recovery. RESULTS: The median NFR Score for all 4247 eligible, consented participants with a valid NFR Score was 70.0 (95% CI: 65.5 to 74.5), with an IQR of 45.5–90.0. A linear regression model indicated statistically significant associations between gender, health conditions, type of ED, clinical grade, access to annual and study leave, and time spent working out-of-hours. Groups including male physicians, consultants, general practitioners (GPs) within the ED, those working in paediatric EDs and those with no long-term health condition or disability had a lower NFR Score. After adjusting for these characteristics, the NFR Score increased by 3.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 7.1) and 6.43 (95% CI: 2.0 to 10.8) for those with difficulty accessing annual and study leave, respectively. Increased percentage of out-of-hours work increased NFR Score almost linearly: 26%–50% out-of-hours work=5.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 8.4); 51%–75% out-of-hours work=10.3 (95% CI: 7.6 to 13.0); 76%–100% out-of-hours work=14.5 (95% CI: 11.0 to 17.9). CONCLUSION: Higher NFR scores were observed among emergency physicians than reported in any other profession or population to date. While out-of-hours working is unavoidable, the linear relationship observed suggests that any reduction may result in NFR improvement. Evidence-based strategies to improve well-being such as proportional out-of-hours working and improved access to annual and study leave should be carefully considered and implemented where feasible. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7607596/ /pubmed/33139301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Cottey, Laura
Roberts, Tom
Graham, Blair
Horner, Daniel
Stevens, Kara Nicola
Enki, Doyo
Lyttle, Mark David
Latour, Jos
Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the uk and ireland: a cross-sectional survey
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33139301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485
work_keys_str_mv AT cotteylaura needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT robertstom needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT grahamblair needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT hornerdaniel needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT stevenskaranicola needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT enkidoyo needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT lyttlemarkdavid needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT latourjos needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey
AT needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey