Cargando…
Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey
OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33139301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485 |
_version_ | 1783604671770787840 |
---|---|
author | Cottey, Laura Roberts, Tom Graham, Blair Horner, Daniel Stevens, Kara Nicola Enki, Doyo Lyttle, Mark David Latour, Jos |
author_facet | Cottey, Laura Roberts, Tom Graham, Blair Horner, Daniel Stevens, Kara Nicola Enki, Doyo Lyttle, Mark David Latour, Jos |
author_sort | Cottey, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency physicians, defined as any registered physician working principally within the ED, responding between June and July 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NFR Scale, an 11-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses how work demands affect intershift recovery. RESULTS: The median NFR Score for all 4247 eligible, consented participants with a valid NFR Score was 70.0 (95% CI: 65.5 to 74.5), with an IQR of 45.5–90.0. A linear regression model indicated statistically significant associations between gender, health conditions, type of ED, clinical grade, access to annual and study leave, and time spent working out-of-hours. Groups including male physicians, consultants, general practitioners (GPs) within the ED, those working in paediatric EDs and those with no long-term health condition or disability had a lower NFR Score. After adjusting for these characteristics, the NFR Score increased by 3.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 7.1) and 6.43 (95% CI: 2.0 to 10.8) for those with difficulty accessing annual and study leave, respectively. Increased percentage of out-of-hours work increased NFR Score almost linearly: 26%–50% out-of-hours work=5.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 8.4); 51%–75% out-of-hours work=10.3 (95% CI: 7.6 to 13.0); 76%–100% out-of-hours work=14.5 (95% CI: 11.0 to 17.9). CONCLUSION: Higher NFR scores were observed among emergency physicians than reported in any other profession or population to date. While out-of-hours working is unavoidable, the linear relationship observed suggests that any reduction may result in NFR improvement. Evidence-based strategies to improve well-being such as proportional out-of-hours working and improved access to annual and study leave should be carefully considered and implemented where feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7607596 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76075962020-11-12 Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey Cottey, Laura Roberts, Tom Graham, Blair Horner, Daniel Stevens, Kara Nicola Enki, Doyo Lyttle, Mark David Latour, Jos BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for recovery (NFR) among emergency physicians and to identify demographic and occupational characteristics associated with higher NFR scores. DESIGN: Cross-sectional electronic survey. SETTING: Emergency departments (EDs) (n=112) in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency physicians, defined as any registered physician working principally within the ED, responding between June and July 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: NFR Scale, an 11-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses how work demands affect intershift recovery. RESULTS: The median NFR Score for all 4247 eligible, consented participants with a valid NFR Score was 70.0 (95% CI: 65.5 to 74.5), with an IQR of 45.5–90.0. A linear regression model indicated statistically significant associations between gender, health conditions, type of ED, clinical grade, access to annual and study leave, and time spent working out-of-hours. Groups including male physicians, consultants, general practitioners (GPs) within the ED, those working in paediatric EDs and those with no long-term health condition or disability had a lower NFR Score. After adjusting for these characteristics, the NFR Score increased by 3.7 (95% CI: 0.3 to 7.1) and 6.43 (95% CI: 2.0 to 10.8) for those with difficulty accessing annual and study leave, respectively. Increased percentage of out-of-hours work increased NFR Score almost linearly: 26%–50% out-of-hours work=5.7 (95% CI: 3.1 to 8.4); 51%–75% out-of-hours work=10.3 (95% CI: 7.6 to 13.0); 76%–100% out-of-hours work=14.5 (95% CI: 11.0 to 17.9). CONCLUSION: Higher NFR scores were observed among emergency physicians than reported in any other profession or population to date. While out-of-hours working is unavoidable, the linear relationship observed suggests that any reduction may result in NFR improvement. Evidence-based strategies to improve well-being such as proportional out-of-hours working and improved access to annual and study leave should be carefully considered and implemented where feasible. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7607596/ /pubmed/33139301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Emergency Medicine Cottey, Laura Roberts, Tom Graham, Blair Horner, Daniel Stevens, Kara Nicola Enki, Doyo Lyttle, Mark David Latour, Jos Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title | Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the UK and Ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | need for recovery amongst emergency physicians in the uk and ireland: a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Emergency Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607596/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33139301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cotteylaura needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT robertstom needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT grahamblair needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT hornerdaniel needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT stevenskaranicola needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT enkidoyo needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT lyttlemarkdavid needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT latourjos needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey AT needforrecoveryamongstemergencyphysiciansintheukandirelandacrosssectionalsurvey |