Cargando…
Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT
OBJECTIVES: The IMPACT trial has compared the benefit in the reduction of moderate/severe exacerbations of single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus dual therapy with FF/VI (ICS/LABA) and UMEC/VI (LAMA/LABA) in the treatment of pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963021 |
_version_ | 1783604698956169216 |
---|---|
author | Marín, José M. Mateos, Luis Roldán, Juan Echave-Sustaeta, José M. Pascual-Guardia, Sergi Pardo, Maria V. Velasco, Beatriz Jones, C. Elaine Kilbride, Sally Lipson, David A. |
author_facet | Marín, José M. Mateos, Luis Roldán, Juan Echave-Sustaeta, José M. Pascual-Guardia, Sergi Pardo, Maria V. Velasco, Beatriz Jones, C. Elaine Kilbride, Sally Lipson, David A. |
author_sort | Marín, José M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The IMPACT trial has compared the benefit in the reduction of moderate/severe exacerbations of single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus dual therapy with FF/VI (ICS/LABA) and UMEC/VI (LAMA/LABA) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive disease (COPD). This study performs a subgroup analysis of the cohort from Spain in the IMPACT study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In IMPACT, a 52-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study (N = 10,355), patients ⩾40 years of age with COPD and ⩾1 moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous year were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg, FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg administered via the Ellipta inhaler. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of the 499 patients from Spain, included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the study. Endpoint assessed included exposure-adjusted rate of moderate and severe exacerbations. RESULTS: In the Spain cohort, the exposure-adjusted rate of on-treatment moderate/severe COPD exacerbations per year for FF/UMEC/VI was 1.31 versus 1.43 and 1.57 for FF/VI and UMEC/VI, respectively. No new adverse events were identified. The results are consistent with those observed in the overall ITT study population. CONCLUSION: In the Spain cohort of the IMPACT study, patients receiving triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI had a lower exposure-adjusted rate of exacerbations compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI, similar to the overall population. Study Title: A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=CTT116855/ https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02164513 Registration number: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513). The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7607727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76077272020-11-13 Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT Marín, José M. Mateos, Luis Roldán, Juan Echave-Sustaeta, José M. Pascual-Guardia, Sergi Pardo, Maria V. Velasco, Beatriz Jones, C. Elaine Kilbride, Sally Lipson, David A. Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research OBJECTIVES: The IMPACT trial has compared the benefit in the reduction of moderate/severe exacerbations of single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) versus dual therapy with FF/VI (ICS/LABA) and UMEC/VI (LAMA/LABA) in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive disease (COPD). This study performs a subgroup analysis of the cohort from Spain in the IMPACT study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In IMPACT, a 52-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study (N = 10,355), patients ⩾40 years of age with COPD and ⩾1 moderate/severe exacerbations in the previous year were randomized 2:2:1 to once-daily FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 µg, FF/VI 100/25 µg or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg administered via the Ellipta inhaler. Here, we present a subgroup analysis of the 499 patients from Spain, included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the study. Endpoint assessed included exposure-adjusted rate of moderate and severe exacerbations. RESULTS: In the Spain cohort, the exposure-adjusted rate of on-treatment moderate/severe COPD exacerbations per year for FF/UMEC/VI was 1.31 versus 1.43 and 1.57 for FF/VI and UMEC/VI, respectively. No new adverse events were identified. The results are consistent with those observed in the overall ITT study population. CONCLUSION: In the Spain cohort of the IMPACT study, patients receiving triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI had a lower exposure-adjusted rate of exacerbations compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI, similar to the overall population. Study Title: A Phase III, 52 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, 3-arm Parallel Group Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of the Fixed Dose Triple Combination FF/UMEC/VI With the Fixed Dose Dual Combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, All Administered Once-daily in the Morning Via a Dry Powder Inhaler in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=CTT116855/ https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02164513 Registration number: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513). The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section. SAGE Publications 2020-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7607727/ /pubmed/33121372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963021 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Marín, José M. Mateos, Luis Roldán, Juan Echave-Sustaeta, José M. Pascual-Guardia, Sergi Pardo, Maria V. Velasco, Beatriz Jones, C. Elaine Kilbride, Sally Lipson, David A. Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title | Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title_full | Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title_short | Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT |
title_sort | efficacy of ff/umec/vi compared with ff/vi and umec/vi in patients with copd: subgroup analysis of the spain cohort in impact |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753466620963021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinjosem efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT mateosluis efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT roldanjuan efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT echavesustaetajosem efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT pascualguardiasergi efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT pardomariav efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT velascobeatriz efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT jonescelaine efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT kilbridesally efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact AT lipsondavida efficacyofffumecvicomparedwithffviandumecviinpatientswithcopdsubgroupanalysisofthespaincohortinimpact |