Cargando…
Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846 |
_version_ | 1783604712028766208 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tsung-Chih Wang, Ren Ching Lin, Yu-Hui Chang, Kuang-Hsi Hung, Li-Ya Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry |
author_facet | Chen, Tsung-Chih Wang, Ren Ching Lin, Yu-Hui Chang, Kuang-Hsi Hung, Li-Ya Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry |
author_sort | Chen, Tsung-Chih |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 208 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent remission induction therapy. These 208 patients were stratified into the posaconazole prophylaxis group (n = 58) and no antifungal prophylaxis group (n = 150). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that induction failure significantly increased the risk of proven or probable IA during the first induction chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 10.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–63.45; p = 0.011] and the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.71–11.75; p = 0.002). However, posaconazole prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of IA during the first induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.14–15.04; p = 0.746) and during the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.29–4.09; p = 0.896). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (514 versus 689 days; p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Successful induction remains fundamental to reducing the risk of IA among AML patients undergoing remission induction chemotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7607783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76077832020-11-13 Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? Chen, Tsung-Chih Wang, Ren Ching Lin, Yu-Hui Chang, Kuang-Hsi Hung, Li-Ya Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry Ther Adv Hematol Original Research BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 208 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent remission induction therapy. These 208 patients were stratified into the posaconazole prophylaxis group (n = 58) and no antifungal prophylaxis group (n = 150). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that induction failure significantly increased the risk of proven or probable IA during the first induction chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 10.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–63.45; p = 0.011] and the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.71–11.75; p = 0.002). However, posaconazole prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of IA during the first induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.14–15.04; p = 0.746) and during the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.29–4.09; p = 0.896). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (514 versus 689 days; p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Successful induction remains fundamental to reducing the risk of IA among AML patients undergoing remission induction chemotherapy. SAGE Publications 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7607783/ /pubmed/33194163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chen, Tsung-Chih Wang, Ren Ching Lin, Yu-Hui Chang, Kuang-Hsi Hung, Li-Ya Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title | Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title_full | Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title_fullStr | Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title_full_unstemmed | Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title_short | Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
title_sort | posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentsungchih posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting AT wangrenching posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting AT linyuhui posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting AT changkuanghsi posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting AT hungliya posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting AT tengchiehlinjerry posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting |