Cargando…

Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tsung-Chih, Wang, Ren Ching, Lin, Yu-Hui, Chang, Kuang-Hsi, Hung, Li-Ya, Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846
_version_ 1783604712028766208
author Chen, Tsung-Chih
Wang, Ren Ching
Lin, Yu-Hui
Chang, Kuang-Hsi
Hung, Li-Ya
Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry
author_facet Chen, Tsung-Chih
Wang, Ren Ching
Lin, Yu-Hui
Chang, Kuang-Hsi
Hung, Li-Ya
Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry
author_sort Chen, Tsung-Chih
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 208 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent remission induction therapy. These 208 patients were stratified into the posaconazole prophylaxis group (n = 58) and no antifungal prophylaxis group (n = 150). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that induction failure significantly increased the risk of proven or probable IA during the first induction chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 10.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–63.45; p = 0.011] and the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.71–11.75; p = 0.002). However, posaconazole prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of IA during the first induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.14–15.04; p = 0.746) and during the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.29–4.09; p = 0.896). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (514 versus 689 days; p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Successful induction remains fundamental to reducing the risk of IA among AML patients undergoing remission induction chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76077832020-11-13 Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting? Chen, Tsung-Chih Wang, Ren Ching Lin, Yu-Hui Chang, Kuang-Hsi Hung, Li-Ya Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry Ther Adv Hematol Original Research BACKGROUND: Posaconazole prophylaxis during remission induction chemotherapy not only decreases the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) but also improves the overall survival rate among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, it remains debatable whether this result applies to patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 208 adult patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent remission induction therapy. These 208 patients were stratified into the posaconazole prophylaxis group (n = 58) and no antifungal prophylaxis group (n = 150). RESULTS: Multivariate analyses showed that induction failure significantly increased the risk of proven or probable IA during the first induction chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 10.47; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.73–63.45; p = 0.011] and the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 1.71–11.75; p = 0.002). However, posaconazole prophylaxis did not reduce the risk of IA during the first induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.14–15.04; p = 0.746) and during the entire course of AML treatment (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.29–4.09; p = 0.896). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (514 versus 689 days; p = 0.454). CONCLUSION: Successful induction remains fundamental to reducing the risk of IA among AML patients undergoing remission induction chemotherapy. SAGE Publications 2020-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7607783/ /pubmed/33194163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Chen, Tsung-Chih
Wang, Ren Ching
Lin, Yu-Hui
Chang, Kuang-Hsi
Hung, Li-Ya
Teng, Chieh-Lin Jerry
Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title_full Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title_fullStr Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title_full_unstemmed Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title_short Posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: Is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
title_sort posaconazole for the prophylaxis of invasive aspergillosis in acute myeloid leukemia: is it still useful outside the clinical trial setting?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33194163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040620720965846
work_keys_str_mv AT chentsungchih posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting
AT wangrenching posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting
AT linyuhui posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting
AT changkuanghsi posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting
AT hungliya posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting
AT tengchiehlinjerry posaconazolefortheprophylaxisofinvasiveaspergillosisinacutemyeloidleukemiaisitstillusefuloutsidetheclinicaltrialsetting