Cargando…

Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the secure location and angle of the most distal screw during posterior malleolar (PM) fracture fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed on September 15, 2019. Distal tibial concave articular depth and PM inclination angle were me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: May, Hasan, Köse, Özkan, Kastan, Özlem, Yunus Emre, Tuluhan, Sindel, Muzaffer, Orçun Akkurt, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32962578
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73886
_version_ 1783604739458465792
author May, Hasan
Köse, Özkan
Kastan, Özlem
Yunus Emre, Tuluhan
Sindel, Muzaffer
Orçun Akkurt, Mehmet
author_facet May, Hasan
Köse, Özkan
Kastan, Özlem
Yunus Emre, Tuluhan
Sindel, Muzaffer
Orçun Akkurt, Mehmet
author_sort May, Hasan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the secure location and angle of the most distal screw during posterior malleolar (PM) fracture fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed on September 15, 2019. Distal tibial concave articular depth and PM inclination angle were measured on 100 (50 male and 50 female) dry tibia bones using a digital caliper. A comparative analysis between male and female tibias was performed. RESULTS: Anteroposterior width of male tibia (38.3±3.1 mm) was wider than female tibia (35.3±3.2 mm) (p:<0.001). Mediolateral length of the male tibia (44.8±3.5 mm) was longer than female tibia (42.7±3.4 mm) (p:0.003). Male tibial joint (5.4±0.7 mm) was deeper than that of female (4.7±0.3 mm) (p:<0.001). The PM inclination angle was higher in male tibia (18.0±1.5°) than female tibia (15.4±1.3°) (p:<0.001). CONCLUSION: If a screw placement parallel to the joint surface is desired, the screw insertion should be located 6 mm and 5 mm superior to the distal edge of the PM rim in males and females, respectively. If a more distal screw is required, the screw should be inserted in at least 18° and 15° anterosuperior direction for males and females, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76079332020-11-04 Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones May, Hasan Köse, Özkan Kastan, Özlem Yunus Emre, Tuluhan Sindel, Muzaffer Orçun Akkurt, Mehmet Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the secure location and angle of the most distal screw during posterior malleolar (PM) fracture fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was performed on September 15, 2019. Distal tibial concave articular depth and PM inclination angle were measured on 100 (50 male and 50 female) dry tibia bones using a digital caliper. A comparative analysis between male and female tibias was performed. RESULTS: Anteroposterior width of male tibia (38.3±3.1 mm) was wider than female tibia (35.3±3.2 mm) (p:<0.001). Mediolateral length of the male tibia (44.8±3.5 mm) was longer than female tibia (42.7±3.4 mm) (p:0.003). Male tibial joint (5.4±0.7 mm) was deeper than that of female (4.7±0.3 mm) (p:<0.001). The PM inclination angle was higher in male tibia (18.0±1.5°) than female tibia (15.4±1.3°) (p:<0.001). CONCLUSION: If a screw placement parallel to the joint surface is desired, the screw insertion should be located 6 mm and 5 mm superior to the distal edge of the PM rim in males and females, respectively. If a more distal screw is required, the screw should be inserted in at least 18° and 15° anterosuperior direction for males and females, respectively. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7607933/ /pubmed/32962578 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73886 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
May, Hasan
Köse, Özkan
Kastan, Özlem
Yunus Emre, Tuluhan
Sindel, Muzaffer
Orçun Akkurt, Mehmet
Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title_full Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title_fullStr Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title_full_unstemmed Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title_short Is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? An anatomic study on dry bones
title_sort is there a safe place for posterior malleolar screw fixation? an anatomic study on dry bones
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32962578
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.73886
work_keys_str_mv AT mayhasan isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones
AT koseozkan isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones
AT kastanozlem isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones
AT yunusemretuluhan isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones
AT sindelmuzaffer isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones
AT orcunakkurtmehmet isthereasafeplaceforposteriormalleolarscrewfixationananatomicstudyondrybones