Cargando…

A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the mechanical features of the existing proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system and the new PFNA system that we designed using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This experimental study was conducted between 2019 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Öner, Kerim, Durusoy, Serhat, Özer, Alaettin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32962571
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.75113
_version_ 1783604745238216704
author Öner, Kerim
Durusoy, Serhat
Özer, Alaettin
author_facet Öner, Kerim
Durusoy, Serhat
Özer, Alaettin
author_sort Öner, Kerim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the mechanical features of the existing proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system and the new PFNA system that we designed using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This experimental study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. We constructed two femur models with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type A1 fractures using 3D computed tomography scans. The new and standard PFNA designs were inserted into the femur models and subsequently transferred to the program. We investigated the distribution of stress on the tip of the lag screw, the calcar region, lag screw-nail junction, and the additional screw inserted through the greater trochanter (only present in the new PFNA design) using 3D finite element analysis. RESULTS: When the von Mises stress distributions in our models were examined, the maximum stress at the lag screw-nail junction was 18 mpa in the new design PFNA, while it was 20 mpa in the classic PFNA model. The maximum stress at the junction of the additional screw that had greater trochanter inlet with the nail was found as 42.5 mpa. The maximum stress on the calcar region was found to be 10 mpa at the new design PFNA, while it was 13 mpa with 30% increase in the classic PFNA. The stress on the tip of the lag screw was found to be 49 mpa in the classic PFNA design, while in the new design PFNA it was found as 28 mpa with a decrease of more than 40%. CONCLUSION: As per our findings, the new PFNA design leads to reduced stress on the lag screw-nail junction, the calcar region, and the tip of the lag screw.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bayçınar Medical Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76079582020-11-04 A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out? Öner, Kerim Durusoy, Serhat Özer, Alaettin Jt Dis Relat Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the mechanical features of the existing proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) system and the new PFNA system that we designed using three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This experimental study was conducted between 2019 and 2020. We constructed two femur models with Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) type A1 fractures using 3D computed tomography scans. The new and standard PFNA designs were inserted into the femur models and subsequently transferred to the program. We investigated the distribution of stress on the tip of the lag screw, the calcar region, lag screw-nail junction, and the additional screw inserted through the greater trochanter (only present in the new PFNA design) using 3D finite element analysis. RESULTS: When the von Mises stress distributions in our models were examined, the maximum stress at the lag screw-nail junction was 18 mpa in the new design PFNA, while it was 20 mpa in the classic PFNA model. The maximum stress at the junction of the additional screw that had greater trochanter inlet with the nail was found as 42.5 mpa. The maximum stress on the calcar region was found to be 10 mpa at the new design PFNA, while it was 13 mpa with 30% increase in the classic PFNA. The stress on the tip of the lag screw was found to be 49 mpa in the classic PFNA design, while in the new design PFNA it was found as 28 mpa with a decrease of more than 40%. CONCLUSION: As per our findings, the new PFNA design leads to reduced stress on the lag screw-nail junction, the calcar region, and the tip of the lag screw. Bayçınar Medical Publishing 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7607958/ /pubmed/32962571 http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.75113 Text en Copyright © 2020, Turkish Joint Diseases Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Article
Öner, Kerim
Durusoy, Serhat
Özer, Alaettin
A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title_full A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title_fullStr A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title_full_unstemmed A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title_short A new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: Is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
title_sort new proximal femoral nail antirotation design: is it effective in preventing varus collapse and cut-out?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32962571
http://dx.doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.75113
work_keys_str_mv AT onerkerim anewproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout
AT durusoyserhat anewproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout
AT ozeralaettin anewproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout
AT onerkerim newproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout
AT durusoyserhat newproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout
AT ozeralaettin newproximalfemoralnailantirotationdesignisiteffectiveinpreventingvaruscollapseandcutout