Cargando…

Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement

BACKGROUND: HemoCue point of care devices has been extensively used in screening for anemia in blood banking. HemoCue can estimate hemoglobin (Hb) both from venous as well as capillary blood. However, the suitability of HemoCue Hb estimation in donor selection is unclear. AIMS: The aims of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Ashish, Chowdhury, Nilotpal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162706
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_93_17
_version_ 1783604749539475456
author Jain, Ashish
Chowdhury, Nilotpal
author_facet Jain, Ashish
Chowdhury, Nilotpal
author_sort Jain, Ashish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HemoCue point of care devices has been extensively used in screening for anemia in blood banking. HemoCue can estimate hemoglobin (Hb) both from venous as well as capillary blood. However, the suitability of HemoCue Hb estimation in donor selection is unclear. AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate variance of difference in Hb measurement in capillary HemoCue estimation as compared to venous HemoCue estimation from automated cell counter and to assess accuracy of two different HemoCue models (201 and 301) against automated cell counter Hb measurements in both capillary as well as venous blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HemoCue 201 and 301 were evaluated by a comparison of methods study against Sysmex XP-100 three-part analyzer at a blood bank of a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India, in 2017. Assessment for anemia of 115 donors was done initially by capillary Hb by a convenience sampling to 2 instruments from 2 different models of HemoCue (total of 4 instruments). Venous blood collected was analyzed by Sysmex XP-100 and all HemoCue analyzers. RESULTS: For capillary method, bias ranged from −0.97 to −0.37 g/dL, upper limit of agreement (LOA) ranged from 0.72 to −1.06 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from −2.65 to −1.79 g/dL. For venous method, bias ranged from −0.03 to −0.24 g/dL, the upper LOA ranged from 0.81 to −1.07 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from −1.04 to −0.57 g/dL. Thus, capillary HemoCue estimation exhibited greater bias as well as wider LOA. Variance of the differences from automated counter was significantly lower for venous HemoCue comparison compared to capillary HemoCue estimation (P < 0.001 for each instrument). CONCLUSION: Errors in capillary sampling of blood show the extent to which preanalytical errors can influence results in point-of-care devices. We suggest augmentation of any blood bank-based Hb screening process based just on capillary sampling to be augmented by a properly selected venous sampling to reduce deferral for a false-positive screen of anemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76079802020-11-05 Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement Jain, Ashish Chowdhury, Nilotpal Asian J Transfus Sci Original Articles BACKGROUND: HemoCue point of care devices has been extensively used in screening for anemia in blood banking. HemoCue can estimate hemoglobin (Hb) both from venous as well as capillary blood. However, the suitability of HemoCue Hb estimation in donor selection is unclear. AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate variance of difference in Hb measurement in capillary HemoCue estimation as compared to venous HemoCue estimation from automated cell counter and to assess accuracy of two different HemoCue models (201 and 301) against automated cell counter Hb measurements in both capillary as well as venous blood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HemoCue 201 and 301 were evaluated by a comparison of methods study against Sysmex XP-100 three-part analyzer at a blood bank of a tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India, in 2017. Assessment for anemia of 115 donors was done initially by capillary Hb by a convenience sampling to 2 instruments from 2 different models of HemoCue (total of 4 instruments). Venous blood collected was analyzed by Sysmex XP-100 and all HemoCue analyzers. RESULTS: For capillary method, bias ranged from −0.97 to −0.37 g/dL, upper limit of agreement (LOA) ranged from 0.72 to −1.06 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from −2.65 to −1.79 g/dL. For venous method, bias ranged from −0.03 to −0.24 g/dL, the upper LOA ranged from 0.81 to −1.07 g/dL, and lower LOA ranged from −1.04 to −0.57 g/dL. Thus, capillary HemoCue estimation exhibited greater bias as well as wider LOA. Variance of the differences from automated counter was significantly lower for venous HemoCue comparison compared to capillary HemoCue estimation (P < 0.001 for each instrument). CONCLUSION: Errors in capillary sampling of blood show the extent to which preanalytical errors can influence results in point-of-care devices. We suggest augmentation of any blood bank-based Hb screening process based just on capillary sampling to be augmented by a properly selected venous sampling to reduce deferral for a false-positive screen of anemia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7607980/ /pubmed/33162706 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_93_17 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Jain, Ashish
Chowdhury, Nilotpal
Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title_full Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title_fullStr Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title_short Comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of HemoCue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
title_sort comparison of the accuracy of capillary hemoglobin estimation and venous hemoglobin estimation by two models of hemocue against automated cell counter hemoglobin measurement
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162706
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_93_17
work_keys_str_mv AT jainashish comparisonoftheaccuracyofcapillaryhemoglobinestimationandvenoushemoglobinestimationbytwomodelsofhemocueagainstautomatedcellcounterhemoglobinmeasurement
AT chowdhurynilotpal comparisonoftheaccuracyofcapillaryhemoglobinestimationandvenoushemoglobinestimationbytwomodelsofhemocueagainstautomatedcellcounterhemoglobinmeasurement