Cargando…

Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)

BACKGROUND: Single-donor platelets (SDPs) prepared by sophisticated automated equipment offer several advantages over random-donor platelets and are being increasingly used to support thrombocytopenic patients. Different apheresis machines working on the principle of centrifugation are being used wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baruah, Sukanya, Bajpai, Meenu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162701
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_138_17
_version_ 1783604752367484928
author Baruah, Sukanya
Bajpai, Meenu
author_facet Baruah, Sukanya
Bajpai, Meenu
author_sort Baruah, Sukanya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Single-donor platelets (SDPs) prepared by sophisticated automated equipment offer several advantages over random-donor platelets and are being increasingly used to support thrombocytopenic patients. Different apheresis machines working on the principle of centrifugation are being used worldwide to collect platelets. This retrospective study was done to compare plateletpheresis on two automated cell seperators – Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus and Trima Accel(®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 100 single-donor plateletpheresis procedures, fifty on each machine, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Donor characteristics were analyzed by Student's t-test and no significant difference was found between the two groups. The parameters compared between the two machines were yield, collection efficiency, blood volume processed, procedure time, acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD) used, leukodepletion achieved, quality control of the products, and adverse donor reactions. RESULTS: Platelet yield (3.054 ± 0.14 vs. 3.120 ± 0.25), quality control of the platelets, leukodepletion achieved, and donor safety were comparable in both the machines. The blood volume processed (2230.74 ± 227.01 vs. 2452.90 ± 318.61), ACD used during procedure (265.48 ± 43.21 vs. 298.10 ± 53.32), procedural time (55.92 ± 13.00 vs. 68.86 ± 12.64), and the postprocedural decrease in donor count in Trima Accel(®) (183.10 ± 23.99 vs. 161.44 ± 63.47) were significantly less than those in Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus. The median collection efficiency of Trima Accel(®) was found to be greater than Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus (0.000649 vs. 0.000608, P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Both Trima Accel(®) and Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus can collect SDPs safely and efficiently. Trima Accel(®) has higher collection efficiency and reduced incidence of citrate-related adverse effects. It also has better potential to optimize productivity due to decreased procedural time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7607992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76079922020-11-05 Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®) Baruah, Sukanya Bajpai, Meenu Asian J Transfus Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Single-donor platelets (SDPs) prepared by sophisticated automated equipment offer several advantages over random-donor platelets and are being increasingly used to support thrombocytopenic patients. Different apheresis machines working on the principle of centrifugation are being used worldwide to collect platelets. This retrospective study was done to compare plateletpheresis on two automated cell seperators – Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus and Trima Accel(®). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 100 single-donor plateletpheresis procedures, fifty on each machine, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Donor characteristics were analyzed by Student's t-test and no significant difference was found between the two groups. The parameters compared between the two machines were yield, collection efficiency, blood volume processed, procedure time, acid-citrate-dextrose (ACD) used, leukodepletion achieved, quality control of the products, and adverse donor reactions. RESULTS: Platelet yield (3.054 ± 0.14 vs. 3.120 ± 0.25), quality control of the platelets, leukodepletion achieved, and donor safety were comparable in both the machines. The blood volume processed (2230.74 ± 227.01 vs. 2452.90 ± 318.61), ACD used during procedure (265.48 ± 43.21 vs. 298.10 ± 53.32), procedural time (55.92 ± 13.00 vs. 68.86 ± 12.64), and the postprocedural decrease in donor count in Trima Accel(®) (183.10 ± 23.99 vs. 161.44 ± 63.47) were significantly less than those in Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus. The median collection efficiency of Trima Accel(®) was found to be greater than Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus (0.000649 vs. 0.000608, P = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Both Trima Accel(®) and Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) Plus can collect SDPs safely and efficiently. Trima Accel(®) has higher collection efficiency and reduced incidence of citrate-related adverse effects. It also has better potential to optimize productivity due to decreased procedural time. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7607992/ /pubmed/33162701 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_138_17 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Baruah, Sukanya
Bajpai, Meenu
Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title_full Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title_short Comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by Haemonetics(®) MCS(®) plus and Trima Accel(®)
title_sort comparative assessment of single-donor plateletpheresis by haemonetics(®) mcs(®) plus and trima accel(®)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7607992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33162701
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ajts.AJTS_138_17
work_keys_str_mv AT baruahsukanya comparativeassessmentofsingledonorplateletpheresisbyhaemoneticsmcsplusandtrimaaccel
AT bajpaimeenu comparativeassessmentofsingledonorplateletpheresisbyhaemoneticsmcsplusandtrimaaccel