Cargando…

Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: The grant of marketing authorisation (MA) for new medicines requires comprehensive assessment by regulatory authorities. This study sought to identify ophthalmic medicines granted United Kingdom MA and consider trends in licence approvals. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed publi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan-Warren, Peter J., Morarji, Jiten B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0758-7
_version_ 1783604785320034304
author Morgan-Warren, Peter J.
Morarji, Jiten B.
author_facet Morgan-Warren, Peter J.
Morarji, Jiten B.
author_sort Morgan-Warren, Peter J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The grant of marketing authorisation (MA) for new medicines requires comprehensive assessment by regulatory authorities. This study sought to identify ophthalmic medicines granted United Kingdom MA and consider trends in licence approvals. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed published lists of products granted MA by the UK Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between January 2001 and December 2018, inclusive. Eye drops and medicinal products intended for ophthalmic use were identified. All regulatory data sources consulted are in the public domain. Data analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 295 MAs were issued for ophthalmic products between 2001 and 2018, inclusive. Of these 229 (78%) were for single-active substances and 66 (22%) fixed-dose combination (FDC). Approvals for products with single-active substance included ocular hypotensives (115; 50%), antibiotics (48; 22%), allergy medicines (30; 13%), lubricants (18; 8%) and anti-inflammatories (11; 5%). Approvals for FDCs were predominantly ocular hypotensives (56; 85%), with timolol combined with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (27; 48%) and prostaglandin analogues (26; 46%) accounting for the majority of glaucoma FDCs. Other FDCs were approved for antibiotic/inflammatory (5; 7.5%), pupillary mydriasis (2; 3%), allergy (2; 3%) and ocular surface lubrication (1; 1.5%) products. A median of 16 licences were approved per year (range 7 [2005] to 35 [2011]). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of MAs granted were for single-agent products, particularly ocular hypotensives and antibiotic preparations. Most products were generic versions of well-established active substances. A trend for increased approvals for FDCs is evident, particularly for the treatment of raised IOP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7608198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76081982020-11-05 Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom Morgan-Warren, Peter J. Morarji, Jiten B. Eye (Lond) Article OBJECTIVES: The grant of marketing authorisation (MA) for new medicines requires comprehensive assessment by regulatory authorities. This study sought to identify ophthalmic medicines granted United Kingdom MA and consider trends in licence approvals. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed published lists of products granted MA by the UK Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency between January 2001 and December 2018, inclusive. Eye drops and medicinal products intended for ophthalmic use were identified. All regulatory data sources consulted are in the public domain. Data analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: A total of 295 MAs were issued for ophthalmic products between 2001 and 2018, inclusive. Of these 229 (78%) were for single-active substances and 66 (22%) fixed-dose combination (FDC). Approvals for products with single-active substance included ocular hypotensives (115; 50%), antibiotics (48; 22%), allergy medicines (30; 13%), lubricants (18; 8%) and anti-inflammatories (11; 5%). Approvals for FDCs were predominantly ocular hypotensives (56; 85%), with timolol combined with carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (27; 48%) and prostaglandin analogues (26; 46%) accounting for the majority of glaucoma FDCs. Other FDCs were approved for antibiotic/inflammatory (5; 7.5%), pupillary mydriasis (2; 3%), allergy (2; 3%) and ocular surface lubrication (1; 1.5%) products. A median of 16 licences were approved per year (range 7 [2005] to 35 [2011]). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of MAs granted were for single-agent products, particularly ocular hypotensives and antibiotic preparations. Most products were generic versions of well-established active substances. A trend for increased approvals for FDCs is evident, particularly for the treatment of raised IOP. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-03 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7608198/ /pubmed/31900439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0758-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2020
spellingShingle Article
Morgan-Warren, Peter J.
Morarji, Jiten B.
Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title_full Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title_short Trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the United Kingdom
title_sort trends in licence approvals for ophthalmic medicines in the united kingdom
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31900439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0758-7
work_keys_str_mv AT morganwarrenpeterj trendsinlicenceapprovalsforophthalmicmedicinesintheunitedkingdom
AT morarjijitenb trendsinlicenceapprovalsforophthalmicmedicinesintheunitedkingdom