Cargando…

Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)

To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henderson, Gail E., Ewing, Molly, Kuczynski, Kristine J., Cadigan, R. Jean, Waltz, Margaret, Butterfield, Rita M., Rini, Christine, Weck, Karen, Berg, Jonathan S., Edwards, Teresa P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1
_version_ 1783604794013777920
author Henderson, Gail E.
Ewing, Molly
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Cadigan, R. Jean
Waltz, Margaret
Butterfield, Rita M.
Rini, Christine
Weck, Karen
Berg, Jonathan S.
Edwards, Teresa P.
author_facet Henderson, Gail E.
Ewing, Molly
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Cadigan, R. Jean
Waltz, Margaret
Butterfield, Rita M.
Rini, Christine
Weck, Karen
Berg, Jonathan S.
Edwards, Teresa P.
author_sort Henderson, Gail E.
collection PubMed
description To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and knowledge about normal/negative genomic screening results for three highly actionable conditions: Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, and Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Based on our prior research and expert review, we developed CoG-NR and tested how well it functioned using hypothetical scenarios in three Qualtrics surveys. We report on its psychometric properties and performance across the three different conditions. The measure performed similarly for the three conditions. Examinations of item difficulty, internal reliability, and differential item functioning indicate that the items perform well, with statistically significant positive correlations with genomic knowledge, health literacy, and objective numeracy. CoG-NR assesses understanding of normal/negative results for each of the conditions. The next step is to examine its performance among individuals who have actually undergone such tests, and subsequent use in clinical or research situations. The CoG-NR measure holds great promise as a tool to enhance benefits of population genomic screening by bringing to light the prevalence of incorrect interpretation of negative results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7608237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76082372020-11-05 Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) Henderson, Gail E. Ewing, Molly Kuczynski, Kristine J. Cadigan, R. Jean Waltz, Margaret Butterfield, Rita M. Rini, Christine Weck, Karen Berg, Jonathan S. Edwards, Teresa P. Eur J Hum Genet Article To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and knowledge about normal/negative genomic screening results for three highly actionable conditions: Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, and Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Based on our prior research and expert review, we developed CoG-NR and tested how well it functioned using hypothetical scenarios in three Qualtrics surveys. We report on its psychometric properties and performance across the three different conditions. The measure performed similarly for the three conditions. Examinations of item difficulty, internal reliability, and differential item functioning indicate that the items perform well, with statistically significant positive correlations with genomic knowledge, health literacy, and objective numeracy. CoG-NR assesses understanding of normal/negative results for each of the conditions. The next step is to examine its performance among individuals who have actually undergone such tests, and subsequent use in clinical or research situations. The CoG-NR measure holds great promise as a tool to enhance benefits of population genomic screening by bringing to light the prevalence of incorrect interpretation of negative results. Springer International Publishing 2020-05-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7608237/ /pubmed/32457518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics 2020
spellingShingle Article
Henderson, Gail E.
Ewing, Molly
Kuczynski, Kristine J.
Cadigan, R. Jean
Waltz, Margaret
Butterfield, Rita M.
Rini, Christine
Weck, Karen
Berg, Jonathan S.
Edwards, Teresa P.
Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title_full Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title_fullStr Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title_short Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
title_sort development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (cog-nr)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hendersongaile developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT ewingmolly developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT kuczynskikristinej developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT cadiganrjean developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT waltzmargaret developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT butterfieldritam developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT rinichristine developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT weckkaren developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT bergjonathans developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr
AT edwardsteresap developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr