Cargando…
Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and k...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1 |
_version_ | 1783604794013777920 |
---|---|
author | Henderson, Gail E. Ewing, Molly Kuczynski, Kristine J. Cadigan, R. Jean Waltz, Margaret Butterfield, Rita M. Rini, Christine Weck, Karen Berg, Jonathan S. Edwards, Teresa P. |
author_facet | Henderson, Gail E. Ewing, Molly Kuczynski, Kristine J. Cadigan, R. Jean Waltz, Margaret Butterfield, Rita M. Rini, Christine Weck, Karen Berg, Jonathan S. Edwards, Teresa P. |
author_sort | Henderson, Gail E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and knowledge about normal/negative genomic screening results for three highly actionable conditions: Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, and Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Based on our prior research and expert review, we developed CoG-NR and tested how well it functioned using hypothetical scenarios in three Qualtrics surveys. We report on its psychometric properties and performance across the three different conditions. The measure performed similarly for the three conditions. Examinations of item difficulty, internal reliability, and differential item functioning indicate that the items perform well, with statistically significant positive correlations with genomic knowledge, health literacy, and objective numeracy. CoG-NR assesses understanding of normal/negative results for each of the conditions. The next step is to examine its performance among individuals who have actually undergone such tests, and subsequent use in clinical or research situations. The CoG-NR measure holds great promise as a tool to enhance benefits of population genomic screening by bringing to light the prevalence of incorrect interpretation of negative results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7608237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76082372020-11-05 Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) Henderson, Gail E. Ewing, Molly Kuczynski, Kristine J. Cadigan, R. Jean Waltz, Margaret Butterfield, Rita M. Rini, Christine Weck, Karen Berg, Jonathan S. Edwards, Teresa P. Eur J Hum Genet Article To realize the promise of population genomic screening for rare medically actionable conditions, critical challenges in the return of normal/negative results must be understood and overcome. Our study objective was to assess the functioning of a new 13-item measure (CoG-NR) of understanding of and knowledge about normal/negative genomic screening results for three highly actionable conditions: Lynch Syndrome, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, and Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Based on our prior research and expert review, we developed CoG-NR and tested how well it functioned using hypothetical scenarios in three Qualtrics surveys. We report on its psychometric properties and performance across the three different conditions. The measure performed similarly for the three conditions. Examinations of item difficulty, internal reliability, and differential item functioning indicate that the items perform well, with statistically significant positive correlations with genomic knowledge, health literacy, and objective numeracy. CoG-NR assesses understanding of normal/negative results for each of the conditions. The next step is to examine its performance among individuals who have actually undergone such tests, and subsequent use in clinical or research situations. The CoG-NR measure holds great promise as a tool to enhance benefits of population genomic screening by bringing to light the prevalence of incorrect interpretation of negative results. Springer International Publishing 2020-05-26 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7608237/ /pubmed/32457518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics 2020 |
spellingShingle | Article Henderson, Gail E. Ewing, Molly Kuczynski, Kristine J. Cadigan, R. Jean Waltz, Margaret Butterfield, Rita M. Rini, Christine Weck, Karen Berg, Jonathan S. Edwards, Teresa P. Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title | Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title_full | Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title_short | Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR) |
title_sort | development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (cog-nr) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7608237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32457518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0657-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendersongaile developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT ewingmolly developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT kuczynskikristinej developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT cadiganrjean developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT waltzmargaret developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT butterfieldritam developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT rinichristine developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT weckkaren developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT bergjonathans developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr AT edwardsteresap developmentandvalidationofameasureofcomprehensionofgenomicscreeningnegativeresultscognr |