Cargando…
Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients
INTRODUCTION: A hallmark of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is aberrant signaling of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Hence, inhibition of MAPK signaling using small molecule inhibitors such as MEK inhibitors (MEKi) may be a promising strategy. METHODS: In this multi-center ret...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03640-3 |
_version_ | 1783605028558209024 |
---|---|
author | Selt, Florian van Tilburg, Cornelis M. Bison, Brigitte Sievers, Philipp Harting, Inga Ecker, Jonas Pajtler, Kristian W. Sahm, Felix Bahr, Annabelle Simon, Michèle Jones, David T. W. Well, Lennart Mautner, Victor-Felix Capper, David Hernáiz Driever, Pablo Gnekow, Astrid Pfister, Stefan M. Witt, Olaf Milde, Till |
author_facet | Selt, Florian van Tilburg, Cornelis M. Bison, Brigitte Sievers, Philipp Harting, Inga Ecker, Jonas Pajtler, Kristian W. Sahm, Felix Bahr, Annabelle Simon, Michèle Jones, David T. W. Well, Lennart Mautner, Victor-Felix Capper, David Hernáiz Driever, Pablo Gnekow, Astrid Pfister, Stefan M. Witt, Olaf Milde, Till |
author_sort | Selt, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A hallmark of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is aberrant signaling of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Hence, inhibition of MAPK signaling using small molecule inhibitors such as MEK inhibitors (MEKi) may be a promising strategy. METHODS: In this multi-center retrospective centrally reviewed study, we analyzed 18 patients treated with the MEKi trametinib for progressive pLGG as an individual treatment decision between 2015 and 2019. We have investigated radiological response as per central radiology review, molecular classification and investigator observed toxicity. RESULTS: We observed 6 partial responses (PR), 2 minor responses (MR), and 10 stable diseases (SD) as best overall responses. Disease control rate (DCR) was 100% under therapy. Responses were observed in KIAA1549:BRAF- as well as neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-driven tumors. Median treatment time was 12.5 months (range: 2 to 27 months). Progressive disease was observed in three patients after cessation of trametinib treatment within a median time of 3 (2–4) months. Therapy related adverse events occurred in 16/18 patients (89%). Eight of 18 patients (44%) experienced severe adverse events (CTCAE III and/or IV; most commonly skin rash and paronychia) requiring dose reduction in 6/18 patients (33%), and discontinuation of treatment in 2/18 patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Trametinib was an active and feasible treatment for progressive pLGG leading to disease control in all patients. However, treatment related toxicity interfered with treatment in individual patients, and disease control after MEKi withdrawal was not sustained in a fraction of patients. Our data support in-class efficacy of MEKi in pLGGs and necessity for upfront randomized testing of trametinib against current standard chemotherapy regimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7609413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76094132020-11-10 Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients Selt, Florian van Tilburg, Cornelis M. Bison, Brigitte Sievers, Philipp Harting, Inga Ecker, Jonas Pajtler, Kristian W. Sahm, Felix Bahr, Annabelle Simon, Michèle Jones, David T. W. Well, Lennart Mautner, Victor-Felix Capper, David Hernáiz Driever, Pablo Gnekow, Astrid Pfister, Stefan M. Witt, Olaf Milde, Till J Neurooncol Clinical Study INTRODUCTION: A hallmark of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is aberrant signaling of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Hence, inhibition of MAPK signaling using small molecule inhibitors such as MEK inhibitors (MEKi) may be a promising strategy. METHODS: In this multi-center retrospective centrally reviewed study, we analyzed 18 patients treated with the MEKi trametinib for progressive pLGG as an individual treatment decision between 2015 and 2019. We have investigated radiological response as per central radiology review, molecular classification and investigator observed toxicity. RESULTS: We observed 6 partial responses (PR), 2 minor responses (MR), and 10 stable diseases (SD) as best overall responses. Disease control rate (DCR) was 100% under therapy. Responses were observed in KIAA1549:BRAF- as well as neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-driven tumors. Median treatment time was 12.5 months (range: 2 to 27 months). Progressive disease was observed in three patients after cessation of trametinib treatment within a median time of 3 (2–4) months. Therapy related adverse events occurred in 16/18 patients (89%). Eight of 18 patients (44%) experienced severe adverse events (CTCAE III and/or IV; most commonly skin rash and paronychia) requiring dose reduction in 6/18 patients (33%), and discontinuation of treatment in 2/18 patients (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Trametinib was an active and feasible treatment for progressive pLGG leading to disease control in all patients. However, treatment related toxicity interfered with treatment in individual patients, and disease control after MEKi withdrawal was not sustained in a fraction of patients. Our data support in-class efficacy of MEKi in pLGGs and necessity for upfront randomized testing of trametinib against current standard chemotherapy regimens. Springer US 2020-10-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7609413/ /pubmed/33026636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03640-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Selt, Florian van Tilburg, Cornelis M. Bison, Brigitte Sievers, Philipp Harting, Inga Ecker, Jonas Pajtler, Kristian W. Sahm, Felix Bahr, Annabelle Simon, Michèle Jones, David T. W. Well, Lennart Mautner, Victor-Felix Capper, David Hernáiz Driever, Pablo Gnekow, Astrid Pfister, Stefan M. Witt, Olaf Milde, Till Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title | Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title_full | Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title_fullStr | Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title_short | Response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
title_sort | response to trametinib treatment in progressive pediatric low-grade glioma patients |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7609413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33026636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03640-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seltflorian responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT vantilburgcornelism responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT bisonbrigitte responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT sieversphilipp responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT hartinginga responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT eckerjonas responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT pajtlerkristianw responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT sahmfelix responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT bahrannabelle responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT simonmichele responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT jonesdavidtw responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT welllennart responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT mautnervictorfelix responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT capperdavid responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT hernaizdrieverpablo responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT gnekowastrid responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT pfisterstefanm responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT wittolaf responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients AT mildetill responsetotrametinibtreatmentinprogressivepediatriclowgradegliomapatients |