Cargando…

Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kitagawa, Noriyuki, Okamura, Takuro, Kitagawa, Nobuko, Hashimoto, Yoshitaka, Hamaguchi, Masahide, Fukui, Michiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291
_version_ 1783605137876451328
author Kitagawa, Noriyuki
Okamura, Takuro
Kitagawa, Nobuko
Hashimoto, Yoshitaka
Hamaguchi, Masahide
Fukui, Michiaki
author_facet Kitagawa, Noriyuki
Okamura, Takuro
Kitagawa, Nobuko
Hashimoto, Yoshitaka
Hamaguchi, Masahide
Fukui, Michiaki
author_sort Kitagawa, Noriyuki
collection PubMed
description AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a two‐step test, and a handgrip measurement, along with general diabetes‐related tests. We calculated the prevalence of LS, and evaluated the association between handgrip strength and LS. RESULTS: We enrolled 234 patients in this study. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up and two‐step tests was 51.5 and 79.0%, respectively. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up or two‐step tests increased with age both in men and women. Using the stand‐up and two‐step tests, 107 patients (46.7%) were diagnosed with LS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, used to assess our identification of LS in terms of grip strength in men and women, showed 95% confidence intervals of 0.703 (0.563–0.813) and 0.698 (0.500–0.842), respectively. The odds ratios of grip strength for LS were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.83–0.97) and 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98) in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that handgrip measurement was useful in detecting LS, and LS should be considered when evaluating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7610119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76101192020-11-09 Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study Kitagawa, Noriyuki Okamura, Takuro Kitagawa, Nobuko Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Hamaguchi, Masahide Fukui, Michiaki J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a two‐step test, and a handgrip measurement, along with general diabetes‐related tests. We calculated the prevalence of LS, and evaluated the association between handgrip strength and LS. RESULTS: We enrolled 234 patients in this study. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up and two‐step tests was 51.5 and 79.0%, respectively. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up or two‐step tests increased with age both in men and women. Using the stand‐up and two‐step tests, 107 patients (46.7%) were diagnosed with LS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, used to assess our identification of LS in terms of grip strength in men and women, showed 95% confidence intervals of 0.703 (0.563–0.813) and 0.698 (0.500–0.842), respectively. The odds ratios of grip strength for LS were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.83–0.97) and 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98) in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that handgrip measurement was useful in detecting LS, and LS should be considered when evaluating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-14 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7610119/ /pubmed/32412166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Kitagawa, Noriyuki
Okamura, Takuro
Kitagawa, Nobuko
Hashimoto, Yoshitaka
Hamaguchi, Masahide
Fukui, Michiaki
Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title_full Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title_fullStr Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title_short Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
title_sort handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a kamogawa‐dm cohort study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412166
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291
work_keys_str_mv AT kitagawanoriyuki handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy
AT okamuratakuro handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy
AT kitagawanobuko handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy
AT hashimotoyoshitaka handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy
AT hamaguchimasahide handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy
AT fukuimichiaki handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy