Cargando…
Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study
AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291 |
_version_ | 1783605137876451328 |
---|---|
author | Kitagawa, Noriyuki Okamura, Takuro Kitagawa, Nobuko Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Hamaguchi, Masahide Fukui, Michiaki |
author_facet | Kitagawa, Noriyuki Okamura, Takuro Kitagawa, Nobuko Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Hamaguchi, Masahide Fukui, Michiaki |
author_sort | Kitagawa, Noriyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a two‐step test, and a handgrip measurement, along with general diabetes‐related tests. We calculated the prevalence of LS, and evaluated the association between handgrip strength and LS. RESULTS: We enrolled 234 patients in this study. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up and two‐step tests was 51.5 and 79.0%, respectively. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up or two‐step tests increased with age both in men and women. Using the stand‐up and two‐step tests, 107 patients (46.7%) were diagnosed with LS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, used to assess our identification of LS in terms of grip strength in men and women, showed 95% confidence intervals of 0.703 (0.563–0.813) and 0.698 (0.500–0.842), respectively. The odds ratios of grip strength for LS were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.83–0.97) and 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98) in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that handgrip measurement was useful in detecting LS, and LS should be considered when evaluating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7610119 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76101192020-11-09 Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study Kitagawa, Noriyuki Okamura, Takuro Kitagawa, Nobuko Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Hamaguchi, Masahide Fukui, Michiaki J Diabetes Investig Articles AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To carry out a cross‐sectional single‐center study in a Japanese hospital to determine the diagnostic value of handgrip measurement to detect locomotive syndrome (LS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive outpatients underwent an LS risk test, which comprised a stand‐up test and a two‐step test, and a handgrip measurement, along with general diabetes‐related tests. We calculated the prevalence of LS, and evaluated the association between handgrip strength and LS. RESULTS: We enrolled 234 patients in this study. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up and two‐step tests was 51.5 and 79.0%, respectively. The prevalence of LS in the stand‐up or two‐step tests increased with age both in men and women. Using the stand‐up and two‐step tests, 107 patients (46.7%) were diagnosed with LS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, used to assess our identification of LS in terms of grip strength in men and women, showed 95% confidence intervals of 0.703 (0.563–0.813) and 0.698 (0.500–0.842), respectively. The odds ratios of grip strength for LS were 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.83–0.97) and 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.76–0.98) in men and women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed that handgrip measurement was useful in detecting LS, and LS should be considered when evaluating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-14 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7610119/ /pubmed/32412166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Articles Kitagawa, Noriyuki Okamura, Takuro Kitagawa, Nobuko Hashimoto, Yoshitaka Hamaguchi, Masahide Fukui, Michiaki Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title | Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title_full | Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title_fullStr | Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title_short | Handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A KAMOGAWA‐DM cohort study |
title_sort | handgrip measurement as a useful benchmark for locomotive syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a kamogawa‐dm cohort study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32412166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitagawanoriyuki handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy AT okamuratakuro handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy AT kitagawanobuko handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy AT hashimotoyoshitaka handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy AT hamaguchimasahide handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy AT fukuimichiaki handgripmeasurementasausefulbenchmarkforlocomotivesyndromeinpatientswithtype2diabetesmellitusakamogawadmcohortstudy |