Cargando…
Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed
The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks to animal health related to nitrite and nitrate in feed. For nitrate ion, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) identified a BMDL (10) of 64 mg nitrate/kg body weight (bw) per day for adult cattle, bas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6290 |
_version_ | 1783605142793224192 |
---|---|
author | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Bampidis, Vasileios Cottrill, Bruce Frutos, Maria Jose Furst, Peter Parker, Anthony Binaglia, Marco Christodoulidou, Anna Gergelova, Petra Guajardo, Irene Munoz Wenger, Carina Hogstrand, Christer |
author_facet | Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Bampidis, Vasileios Cottrill, Bruce Frutos, Maria Jose Furst, Peter Parker, Anthony Binaglia, Marco Christodoulidou, Anna Gergelova, Petra Guajardo, Irene Munoz Wenger, Carina Hogstrand, Christer |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks to animal health related to nitrite and nitrate in feed. For nitrate ion, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) identified a BMDL (10) of 64 mg nitrate/kg body weight (bw) per day for adult cattle, based on methaemoglobin (MetHb) levels in animal's blood that would not induce clinical signs of hypoxia. The BMDL (10) is applicable to all bovines, except for pregnant cows in which reproductive effects were not clearly associated with MetHb formation. Since the data available suggested that ovines and caprines are not more sensitive than bovines, the BMDL (10) could also be applied to these species. Highest mean exposure estimates of 53 and 60 mg nitrate/kg bw per day in grass silage‐based diets for beef cattle and fattening goats, respectively, may raise a health concern for ruminants when compared with the BMDL (10) of 64 mg nitrate/kg bw per day. The concern may be higher because other forages might contain higher levels of nitrate. Highest mean exposure estimates of 2.0 mg nitrate/kg bw per day in pigs’ feeds indicate a low risk for adverse health effects, when compared with an identified no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 410 mg nitrate/kg bw per day, although the levels of exposure might be underestimated due to the absence of data on certain key ingredients in the diets of this species. Due to the limitations of the data available, the CONTAM Panel could not characterise the health risk in species other than ruminants and pigs from nitrate and in all livestock and companion animals from nitrite. Based on a limited data set, both the transfer of nitrate and nitrite from feed to food products of animal origin and the nitrate‐ and nitrite‐mediated formation of N‐nitrosamines and their transfer into these products are likely to be negligible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7610142 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76101422020-11-09 Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Bampidis, Vasileios Cottrill, Bruce Frutos, Maria Jose Furst, Peter Parker, Anthony Binaglia, Marco Christodoulidou, Anna Gergelova, Petra Guajardo, Irene Munoz Wenger, Carina Hogstrand, Christer EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission asked EFSA for a scientific opinion on the risks to animal health related to nitrite and nitrate in feed. For nitrate ion, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) identified a BMDL (10) of 64 mg nitrate/kg body weight (bw) per day for adult cattle, based on methaemoglobin (MetHb) levels in animal's blood that would not induce clinical signs of hypoxia. The BMDL (10) is applicable to all bovines, except for pregnant cows in which reproductive effects were not clearly associated with MetHb formation. Since the data available suggested that ovines and caprines are not more sensitive than bovines, the BMDL (10) could also be applied to these species. Highest mean exposure estimates of 53 and 60 mg nitrate/kg bw per day in grass silage‐based diets for beef cattle and fattening goats, respectively, may raise a health concern for ruminants when compared with the BMDL (10) of 64 mg nitrate/kg bw per day. The concern may be higher because other forages might contain higher levels of nitrate. Highest mean exposure estimates of 2.0 mg nitrate/kg bw per day in pigs’ feeds indicate a low risk for adverse health effects, when compared with an identified no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 410 mg nitrate/kg bw per day, although the levels of exposure might be underestimated due to the absence of data on certain key ingredients in the diets of this species. Due to the limitations of the data available, the CONTAM Panel could not characterise the health risk in species other than ruminants and pigs from nitrate and in all livestock and companion animals from nitrite. Based on a limited data set, both the transfer of nitrate and nitrite from feed to food products of animal origin and the nitrate‐ and nitrite‐mediated formation of N‐nitrosamines and their transfer into these products are likely to be negligible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7610142/ /pubmed/33173543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6290 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Schrenk, Dieter Bignami, Margherita Bodin, Laurent Chipman, James Kevin del Mazo, Jesús Grasl‐Kraupp, Bettina Hoogenboom, Laurentius (Ron) Leblanc, Jean‐Charles Nebbia, Carlo Stefano Nielsen, Elsa Ntzani, Evangelia Petersen, Annette Sand, Salomon Schwerdtle, Tanja Vleminckx, Christiane Wallace, Heather Bampidis, Vasileios Cottrill, Bruce Frutos, Maria Jose Furst, Peter Parker, Anthony Binaglia, Marco Christodoulidou, Anna Gergelova, Petra Guajardo, Irene Munoz Wenger, Carina Hogstrand, Christer Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title | Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title_full | Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title_fullStr | Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title_short | Risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
title_sort | risk assessment of nitrate and nitrite in feed |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610142/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33173543 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT schrenkdieter riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT bignamimargherita riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT bodinlaurent riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT chipmanjameskevin riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT delmazojesus riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT graslkrauppbettina riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT hoogenboomlaurentiusron riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT leblancjeancharles riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT nebbiacarlostefano riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT nielsenelsa riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT ntzanievangelia riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT petersenannette riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT sandsalomon riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT schwerdtletanja riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT vleminckxchristiane riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT wallaceheather riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT bampidisvasileios riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT cottrillbruce riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT frutosmariajose riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT furstpeter riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT parkeranthony riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT binagliamarco riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT christodoulidouanna riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT gergelovapetra riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT guajardoirenemunoz riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT wengercarina riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed AT hogstrandchrister riskassessmentofnitrateandnitriteinfeed |