Cargando…
Porous Metal–Organic Polyhedra: Morphology, Porosity, and Guest Binding
[Image: see text] Designing porous materials which can selectively adsorb CO(2) or CH(4) is an important environmental and industrial goal which requires an understanding of the host–guest interactions involved at the atomic scale. Metal–organic polyhedra (MOPs) showing permanent porosity upon desol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2020
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01935 |
_version_ | 1783605156919640064 |
---|---|
author | Argent, Stephen P. da Silva, Ivan Greenaway, Alex Savage, Mathew Humby, Jack Davies, Andrew J. Nowell, Harriott Lewis, William Manuel, Pascal Tang, Chiu C. Blake, Alexander J. George, Michael W. Markevich, Alexander V. Besley, Elena Yang, Sihai Champness, Neil R. Schröder, Martin |
author_facet | Argent, Stephen P. da Silva, Ivan Greenaway, Alex Savage, Mathew Humby, Jack Davies, Andrew J. Nowell, Harriott Lewis, William Manuel, Pascal Tang, Chiu C. Blake, Alexander J. George, Michael W. Markevich, Alexander V. Besley, Elena Yang, Sihai Champness, Neil R. Schröder, Martin |
author_sort | Argent, Stephen P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Designing porous materials which can selectively adsorb CO(2) or CH(4) is an important environmental and industrial goal which requires an understanding of the host–guest interactions involved at the atomic scale. Metal–organic polyhedra (MOPs) showing permanent porosity upon desolvation are rarely observed. We report a family of MOPs (Cu-1a, Cu-1b, Cu-2), which derive their permanent porosity from cavities between packed cages rather than from within the polyhedra. Thus, for Cu-1a, the void fraction outside the cages totals 56% with only 2% within. The relative stabilities of these MOP structures are rationalized by considering their weak nondirectional packing interactions using Hirshfeld surface analyses. The exceptional stability of Cu-1a enables a detailed structural investigation into the adsorption of CO(2) and CH(4) using in situ X-ray and neutron diffraction, coupled with DFT calculations. The primary binding sites for adsorbed CO(2) and CH(4) in Cu-1a are found to be the open metal sites and pockets defined by the faces of phenyl rings. More importantly, the structural analysis of a hydrated sample of Cu-1a reveals a strong hydrogen bond between the adsorbed CO(2) molecule and the Cu(II)-bound water molecule, shedding light on previous empirical and theoretical observations that partial hydration of metal−organic framework (MOF) materials containing open metal sites increases their uptake of CO(2). The results of the crystallographic study on MOP–gas binding have been rationalized using DFT calculations, yielding individual binding energies for the various pore environments of Cu-1a. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7610226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76102262020-11-04 Porous Metal–Organic Polyhedra: Morphology, Porosity, and Guest Binding Argent, Stephen P. da Silva, Ivan Greenaway, Alex Savage, Mathew Humby, Jack Davies, Andrew J. Nowell, Harriott Lewis, William Manuel, Pascal Tang, Chiu C. Blake, Alexander J. George, Michael W. Markevich, Alexander V. Besley, Elena Yang, Sihai Champness, Neil R. Schröder, Martin Inorg Chem [Image: see text] Designing porous materials which can selectively adsorb CO(2) or CH(4) is an important environmental and industrial goal which requires an understanding of the host–guest interactions involved at the atomic scale. Metal–organic polyhedra (MOPs) showing permanent porosity upon desolvation are rarely observed. We report a family of MOPs (Cu-1a, Cu-1b, Cu-2), which derive their permanent porosity from cavities between packed cages rather than from within the polyhedra. Thus, for Cu-1a, the void fraction outside the cages totals 56% with only 2% within. The relative stabilities of these MOP structures are rationalized by considering their weak nondirectional packing interactions using Hirshfeld surface analyses. The exceptional stability of Cu-1a enables a detailed structural investigation into the adsorption of CO(2) and CH(4) using in situ X-ray and neutron diffraction, coupled with DFT calculations. The primary binding sites for adsorbed CO(2) and CH(4) in Cu-1a are found to be the open metal sites and pockets defined by the faces of phenyl rings. More importantly, the structural analysis of a hydrated sample of Cu-1a reveals a strong hydrogen bond between the adsorbed CO(2) molecule and the Cu(II)-bound water molecule, shedding light on previous empirical and theoretical observations that partial hydration of metal−organic framework (MOF) materials containing open metal sites increases their uptake of CO(2). The results of the crystallographic study on MOP–gas binding have been rationalized using DFT calculations, yielding individual binding energies for the various pore environments of Cu-1a. American Chemical Society 2020-10-12 2020-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7610226/ /pubmed/33044820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01935 Text en This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccby_termsofuse.html) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the author and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Argent, Stephen P. da Silva, Ivan Greenaway, Alex Savage, Mathew Humby, Jack Davies, Andrew J. Nowell, Harriott Lewis, William Manuel, Pascal Tang, Chiu C. Blake, Alexander J. George, Michael W. Markevich, Alexander V. Besley, Elena Yang, Sihai Champness, Neil R. Schröder, Martin Porous Metal–Organic Polyhedra: Morphology, Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title | Porous Metal–Organic
Polyhedra: Morphology,
Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title_full | Porous Metal–Organic
Polyhedra: Morphology,
Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title_fullStr | Porous Metal–Organic
Polyhedra: Morphology,
Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title_full_unstemmed | Porous Metal–Organic
Polyhedra: Morphology,
Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title_short | Porous Metal–Organic
Polyhedra: Morphology,
Porosity, and Guest Binding |
title_sort | porous metal–organic
polyhedra: morphology,
porosity, and guest binding |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33044820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c01935 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT argentstephenp porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT dasilvaivan porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT greenawayalex porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT savagemathew porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT humbyjack porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT daviesandrewj porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT nowellharriott porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT lewiswilliam porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT manuelpascal porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT tangchiuc porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT blakealexanderj porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT georgemichaelw porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT markevichalexanderv porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT besleyelena porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT yangsihai porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT champnessneilr porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding AT schrodermartin porousmetalorganicpolyhedramorphologyporosityandguestbinding |