Cargando…

Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics

Cortical stiffness is an important cellular property that changes during migration, adhesion, and growth. Previous atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation measurements of cells cultured on deformable substrates suggested that cells adapt their stiffness to that of their surroundings. Here we show...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rheinlaender, Johannes, Dimitracopoulos, Andrea, Wallmeyer, Bernhard, Kronenberg, Nils M., Chalut, Kevin J., Gather, Malte C., Betz, Timo, Charras, Guillaume, Franze, Kristian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0684-x
_version_ 1783605200363192320
author Rheinlaender, Johannes
Dimitracopoulos, Andrea
Wallmeyer, Bernhard
Kronenberg, Nils M.
Chalut, Kevin J.
Gather, Malte C.
Betz, Timo
Charras, Guillaume
Franze, Kristian
author_facet Rheinlaender, Johannes
Dimitracopoulos, Andrea
Wallmeyer, Bernhard
Kronenberg, Nils M.
Chalut, Kevin J.
Gather, Malte C.
Betz, Timo
Charras, Guillaume
Franze, Kristian
author_sort Rheinlaender, Johannes
collection PubMed
description Cortical stiffness is an important cellular property that changes during migration, adhesion, and growth. Previous atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation measurements of cells cultured on deformable substrates suggested that cells adapt their stiffness to that of their surroundings. Here we show that the force applied by AFM onto cells results in a significant deformation of the underlying substrate if it is softer than the cells. This ‘soft substrate effect’ leads to an underestimation of a cell’s elastic modulus when analyzing data using a standard Hertz model, as confirmed by finite element modelling (FEM) and AFM measurements of calibrated polyacrylamide beads, microglial cells, and fibroblasts. To account for this substrate deformation, we developed the ‘composite cell-substrate model’ (CoCS model). Correcting for the substrate indentation revealed that cortical cell stiffness is largely independent of substrate mechanics, which has significant implications for our interpretation of many physiological and pathological processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7610513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76105132021-04-01 Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics Rheinlaender, Johannes Dimitracopoulos, Andrea Wallmeyer, Bernhard Kronenberg, Nils M. Chalut, Kevin J. Gather, Malte C. Betz, Timo Charras, Guillaume Franze, Kristian Nat Mater Article Cortical stiffness is an important cellular property that changes during migration, adhesion, and growth. Previous atomic force microscopy (AFM) indentation measurements of cells cultured on deformable substrates suggested that cells adapt their stiffness to that of their surroundings. Here we show that the force applied by AFM onto cells results in a significant deformation of the underlying substrate if it is softer than the cells. This ‘soft substrate effect’ leads to an underestimation of a cell’s elastic modulus when analyzing data using a standard Hertz model, as confirmed by finite element modelling (FEM) and AFM measurements of calibrated polyacrylamide beads, microglial cells, and fibroblasts. To account for this substrate deformation, we developed the ‘composite cell-substrate model’ (CoCS model). Correcting for the substrate indentation revealed that cortical cell stiffness is largely independent of substrate mechanics, which has significant implications for our interpretation of many physiological and pathological processes. 2020-09-01 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7610513/ /pubmed/32451510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0684-x Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#termsUsers may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Rheinlaender, Johannes
Dimitracopoulos, Andrea
Wallmeyer, Bernhard
Kronenberg, Nils M.
Chalut, Kevin J.
Gather, Malte C.
Betz, Timo
Charras, Guillaume
Franze, Kristian
Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title_full Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title_fullStr Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title_short Cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
title_sort cortical cell stiffness is independent of substrate mechanics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32451510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41563-020-0684-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rheinlaenderjohannes corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT dimitracopoulosandrea corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT wallmeyerbernhard corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT kronenbergnilsm corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT chalutkevinj corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT gathermaltec corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT betztimo corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT charrasguillaume corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics
AT franzekristian corticalcellstiffnessisindependentofsubstratemechanics