Cargando…
A manifesto for reproducible science
Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproduc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |
_version_ | 1783605223917355008 |
---|---|
author | Munafò, Marcus R. Nosek, Brian A. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. Button, Katherine S. Chambers, Christopher D. du Sert, Nathalie Percie Simonsohn, Uri Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Ware, Jennifer J. Ioannidis, John P. A. |
author_facet | Munafò, Marcus R. Nosek, Brian A. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. Button, Katherine S. Chambers, Christopher D. du Sert, Nathalie Percie Simonsohn, Uri Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Ware, Jennifer J. Ioannidis, John P. A. |
author_sort | Munafò, Marcus R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, institutions, funders and journals will require iterative evaluation and improvement. We discuss the goals of these measures, and how they can be implemented, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducibility and efficiency of scientific research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7610724 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76107242021-05-04 A manifesto for reproducible science Munafò, Marcus R. Nosek, Brian A. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. Button, Katherine S. Chambers, Christopher D. du Sert, Nathalie Percie Simonsohn, Uri Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Ware, Jennifer J. Ioannidis, John P. A. Nat Hum Behav Article Improving the reliability and efficiency of scientific research will increase the credibility of the published scientific literature and accelerate discovery. Here we argue for the adoption of measures to optimize key elements of the scientific process: methods, reporting and dissemination, reproducibility, evaluation and incentives. There is some evidence from both simulations and empirical studies supporting the likely effectiveness of these measures, but their broad adoption by researchers, institutions, funders and journals will require iterative evaluation and improvement. We discuss the goals of these measures, and how they can be implemented, in the hope that this will facilitate action toward improving the transparency, reproducibility and efficiency of scientific research. 2017-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7610724/ /pubmed/33954258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Munafò, Marcus R. Nosek, Brian A. Bishop, Dorothy V. M. Button, Katherine S. Chambers, Christopher D. du Sert, Nathalie Percie Simonsohn, Uri Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan Ware, Jennifer J. Ioannidis, John P. A. A manifesto for reproducible science |
title | A manifesto for reproducible science |
title_full | A manifesto for reproducible science |
title_fullStr | A manifesto for reproducible science |
title_full_unstemmed | A manifesto for reproducible science |
title_short | A manifesto for reproducible science |
title_sort | manifesto for reproducible science |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610724/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33954258 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munafomarcusr amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT nosekbriana amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT bishopdorothyvm amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT buttonkatherines amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT chamberschristopherd amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT dusertnathaliepercie amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT simonsohnuri amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT wagenmakersericjan amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT warejenniferj amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT ioannidisjohnpa amanifestoforreproduciblescience AT munafomarcusr manifestoforreproduciblescience AT nosekbriana manifestoforreproduciblescience AT bishopdorothyvm manifestoforreproduciblescience AT buttonkatherines manifestoforreproduciblescience AT chamberschristopherd manifestoforreproduciblescience AT dusertnathaliepercie manifestoforreproduciblescience AT simonsohnuri manifestoforreproduciblescience AT wagenmakersericjan manifestoforreproduciblescience AT warejenniferj manifestoforreproduciblescience AT ioannidisjohnpa manifestoforreproduciblescience |