Cargando…

E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland

INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes were one measure introduced to help people in custody (PiC) to prepare for and cope with implementation of comprehensive smokefree policies in Scottish prisons. Our earlier study explored experiences of vaping when e-cigarettes were first introduced and most participants w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Ashley, O’Donnell, Rachel, Eadie, Douglas, Ford, Allison, Mitchell, Danielle, Hackett, Alison, Sweeting, Helen, Bauld, Linda, Hunt, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa271
_version_ 1783605238017556480
author Brown, Ashley
O’Donnell, Rachel
Eadie, Douglas
Ford, Allison
Mitchell, Danielle
Hackett, Alison
Sweeting, Helen
Bauld, Linda
Hunt, Kate
author_facet Brown, Ashley
O’Donnell, Rachel
Eadie, Douglas
Ford, Allison
Mitchell, Danielle
Hackett, Alison
Sweeting, Helen
Bauld, Linda
Hunt, Kate
author_sort Brown, Ashley
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes were one measure introduced to help people in custody (PiC) to prepare for and cope with implementation of comprehensive smokefree policies in Scottish prisons. Our earlier study explored experiences of vaping when e-cigarettes were first introduced and most participants were dual tobacco and e-cigarette users. Here we present findings of a subsequent study of vaping among a different sample of PiC when use of tobacco was prohibited in prison, and smokefree policy had become the norm. METHODS: Twenty-eight qualitative interviews were conducted with PiC who were current or former users of e-cigarettes in prison, 6–10 months after implementation of a smokefree policy. Data were managed and analyzed using the framework approach. RESULTS: PiC reported that vaping helped with mandated smoking abstinence. However, findings suggest that some PiC may be susceptible to heavy e-cigarette use potentially as a consequence of high nicotine dependence and situational factors such as e-cigarette product choice and availability in prisons; issues with nicotine delivery; prison regimes; and use of e-cigarettes for managing negative emotions. These factors may act as barriers to cutting down or stopping use of e-cigarettes by PiC who want to make changes due to dissatisfaction with vaping or lack of interest in continued use of nicotine, cost, and/or health concerns. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes helped PiC to cope with smokefree rules, although concerns about e-cigarette efficacy, cost, and safety were raised. PiC may desire or benefit both from conventional smoking cessation programs and from interventions to support reduction, or cessation, of vaping. IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight successes, challenges, and potential solutions in respect of use of e-cigarettes to cope with mandated smoking abstinence in populations with high smoking prevalence and heavy nicotine dependence. Experiences from prisons in Scotland may be of particular interest to health and/or justice services in other jurisdictions, with similar legislation on e-cigarettes to the United Kingdom, who are planning for institutional smokefree policies in their prisons or inpatient mental health settings in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7610854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76108542021-07-02 E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland Brown, Ashley O’Donnell, Rachel Eadie, Douglas Ford, Allison Mitchell, Danielle Hackett, Alison Sweeting, Helen Bauld, Linda Hunt, Kate Nicotine Tob Res Original Investigations INTRODUCTION: E-cigarettes were one measure introduced to help people in custody (PiC) to prepare for and cope with implementation of comprehensive smokefree policies in Scottish prisons. Our earlier study explored experiences of vaping when e-cigarettes were first introduced and most participants were dual tobacco and e-cigarette users. Here we present findings of a subsequent study of vaping among a different sample of PiC when use of tobacco was prohibited in prison, and smokefree policy had become the norm. METHODS: Twenty-eight qualitative interviews were conducted with PiC who were current or former users of e-cigarettes in prison, 6–10 months after implementation of a smokefree policy. Data were managed and analyzed using the framework approach. RESULTS: PiC reported that vaping helped with mandated smoking abstinence. However, findings suggest that some PiC may be susceptible to heavy e-cigarette use potentially as a consequence of high nicotine dependence and situational factors such as e-cigarette product choice and availability in prisons; issues with nicotine delivery; prison regimes; and use of e-cigarettes for managing negative emotions. These factors may act as barriers to cutting down or stopping use of e-cigarettes by PiC who want to make changes due to dissatisfaction with vaping or lack of interest in continued use of nicotine, cost, and/or health concerns. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes helped PiC to cope with smokefree rules, although concerns about e-cigarette efficacy, cost, and safety were raised. PiC may desire or benefit both from conventional smoking cessation programs and from interventions to support reduction, or cessation, of vaping. IMPLICATIONS: Findings highlight successes, challenges, and potential solutions in respect of use of e-cigarettes to cope with mandated smoking abstinence in populations with high smoking prevalence and heavy nicotine dependence. Experiences from prisons in Scotland may be of particular interest to health and/or justice services in other jurisdictions, with similar legislation on e-cigarettes to the United Kingdom, who are planning for institutional smokefree policies in their prisons or inpatient mental health settings in the future. Oxford University Press 2020-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7610854/ /pubmed/33367804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa271 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Brown, Ashley
O’Donnell, Rachel
Eadie, Douglas
Ford, Allison
Mitchell, Danielle
Hackett, Alison
Sweeting, Helen
Bauld, Linda
Hunt, Kate
E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title_full E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title_fullStr E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title_full_unstemmed E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title_short E-cigarette Use in Prisons With Recently Established Smokefree Policies: A Qualitative Interview Study With People in Custody in Scotland
title_sort e-cigarette use in prisons with recently established smokefree policies: a qualitative interview study with people in custody in scotland
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa271
work_keys_str_mv AT brownashley ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT odonnellrachel ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT eadiedouglas ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT fordallison ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT mitchelldanielle ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT hackettalison ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT sweetinghelen ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT bauldlinda ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland
AT huntkate ecigaretteuseinprisonswithrecentlyestablishedsmokefreepoliciesaqualitativeinterviewstudywithpeopleincustodyinscotland