Cargando…

Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control

The typical control of myoelectric interfaces, whether in laboratory settings or real-life prosthetic applications, largely relies on visual feedback because proprioceptive signals from the controlling muscles are either not available or very noisy. We conducted a set of experiments to test whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pistohl, Tobias, Joshi, Deepak, Ganesh, Gowrishankar, Jackson, Andrew, Nazarpour, Kianoush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2355856
_version_ 1783605247974834176
author Pistohl, Tobias
Joshi, Deepak
Ganesh, Gowrishankar
Jackson, Andrew
Nazarpour, Kianoush
author_facet Pistohl, Tobias
Joshi, Deepak
Ganesh, Gowrishankar
Jackson, Andrew
Nazarpour, Kianoush
author_sort Pistohl, Tobias
collection PubMed
description The typical control of myoelectric interfaces, whether in laboratory settings or real-life prosthetic applications, largely relies on visual feedback because proprioceptive signals from the controlling muscles are either not available or very noisy. We conducted a set of experiments to test whether artificial proprioceptive feedback, delivered non-invasively to another limb, can improve control of a two-dimensional myoelectrically-controlled computer interface. In these experiments, participants’ were required to reach a target with a visual cursor that was controlled by electromyogram signals recorded from muscles of the left hand, while they were provided with an additional proprioceptive feedback on their right arm by moving it with a robotic manipulandum. Provision of additional artificial proprioceptive feedback improved the angular accuracy of their movements when compared to using visual feedback alone but did not increase the overall accuracy quantified with the average distance between the cursor and the target. The advantages conferred by proprioception were present only when the proprioceptive feedback had similar orientation to the visual feedback in the task space and not when it was mirrored, demonstrating the importance of congruency in feedback modalities for multi-sensory integration. Our results reveal the ability of the human motor system to learn new inter-limb sensory-motor associations; the motor system can utilize task-related sensory feedback, even when it is available on a limb distinct from the one being actuated. In addition, the proposed task structure provides a flexible test paradigm by which the effectiveness of various sensory feedback and multi-sensory integration for myoelectric prosthesis control can be evaluated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7610977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76109772021-06-14 Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control Pistohl, Tobias Joshi, Deepak Ganesh, Gowrishankar Jackson, Andrew Nazarpour, Kianoush IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Article The typical control of myoelectric interfaces, whether in laboratory settings or real-life prosthetic applications, largely relies on visual feedback because proprioceptive signals from the controlling muscles are either not available or very noisy. We conducted a set of experiments to test whether artificial proprioceptive feedback, delivered non-invasively to another limb, can improve control of a two-dimensional myoelectrically-controlled computer interface. In these experiments, participants’ were required to reach a target with a visual cursor that was controlled by electromyogram signals recorded from muscles of the left hand, while they were provided with an additional proprioceptive feedback on their right arm by moving it with a robotic manipulandum. Provision of additional artificial proprioceptive feedback improved the angular accuracy of their movements when compared to using visual feedback alone but did not increase the overall accuracy quantified with the average distance between the cursor and the target. The advantages conferred by proprioception were present only when the proprioceptive feedback had similar orientation to the visual feedback in the task space and not when it was mirrored, demonstrating the importance of congruency in feedback modalities for multi-sensory integration. Our results reveal the ability of the human motor system to learn new inter-limb sensory-motor associations; the motor system can utilize task-related sensory feedback, even when it is available on a limb distinct from the one being actuated. In addition, the proposed task structure provides a flexible test paradigm by which the effectiveness of various sensory feedback and multi-sensory integration for myoelectric prosthesis control can be evaluated. 2015-05-01 2014-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7610977/ /pubmed/25216484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2355856 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Pistohl, Tobias
Joshi, Deepak
Ganesh, Gowrishankar
Jackson, Andrew
Nazarpour, Kianoush
Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title_full Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title_fullStr Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title_short Artificial Proprioceptive Feedback for Myoelectric Control
title_sort artificial proprioceptive feedback for myoelectric control
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7610977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25216484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2355856
work_keys_str_mv AT pistohltobias artificialproprioceptivefeedbackformyoelectriccontrol
AT joshideepak artificialproprioceptivefeedbackformyoelectriccontrol
AT ganeshgowrishankar artificialproprioceptivefeedbackformyoelectriccontrol
AT jacksonandrew artificialproprioceptivefeedbackformyoelectriccontrol
AT nazarpourkianoush artificialproprioceptivefeedbackformyoelectriccontrol