Cargando…

LifeFirst: Impact of a school-based tobacco and supari cessation intervention among adolescent students in Mumbai, India

INTRODUCTION: The youth are a vulnerable population-group for tobacco-related harms. Schools are an excellent setting for health promotion; yet there is a dearth of school-based cessation interventions, rarely evaluated for their impact. Here, we assess the impact of the LifeFirst program: an ongoin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhojani, Upendra, Varma, Amiti, Hebbar, Pragati B., Mandal, Gauri, Gupte, Himanshu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34316722
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/popmed/134990
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The youth are a vulnerable population-group for tobacco-related harms. Schools are an excellent setting for health promotion; yet there is a dearth of school-based cessation interventions, rarely evaluated for their impact. Here, we assess the impact of the LifeFirst program: an ongoing tobacco and supari (areca nut) cessation intervention delivered to students from corporation schools in Mumbai city. METHODS: We used a prospective quasi-experimental design with an intervention and a control arm embedded within an ongoing LifeFirst program in select schools. We used a difference-in-difference analysis with baseline and end-line surveys to assess the program’s impact on students’ knowledge about harms, students’ refusal skills, and prevalence of tobacco/supari use. We report our work using the TREND statement checklist. RESULTS: A total of 959 students registered in the LifeFirst program. In our analysis, we included 827 students who completed both the baseline and end-line surveys. Postintervention, we found both tobacco and supari use reduced substantially among the intervention group while tobacco use increased among the control group. The difference-in-difference estimates show a statistically significant reduction of 17.9 and 38.1 percentage points in the intervention group for tobacco and supari use respectively, beyond the reduction in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The LifeFirst program was successful in reducing tobacco and supari use among the study participants and protected students in the intervention group against new uptake of tobacco. It helped improve knowledge score and refusal skills among students. Implementation and evaluation of similar school-based programs should be considered as part of a multi-strategy approach to reducing tobacco use among young people.